I think they do have a lot in common, and I've done work in Oz over the years and watched their NBN proposal develop pretty much from the first. I think it raises some questions as well as raising some prospects, and it's way too early in their experiment for me to be able to call the ball on the outcome. The most profound issue is whether "competition" above the physical layer is meaningful. For example the US CLEC process hasn't moved the ball much in terms of services or pricing, and many argue that it discouraged plant upgrades because it made the investment subject to wholesaling. Would a government-run physical layer spawn real innovation above, or would it just spawn minimal resale of what's below? If the latter, then the costs don't change and you'd be better off nationalizing everything.
This relates to a net neutrality proposal that looks appealing: Separate the physical network from services on top of it. The physical network becomes a regulated monopoly, but the services on top of it are free to compete. This sidesteps the competitive issues that other net neutrality proposals are designed to protect, without creating a rigid and complicated regulatory infrastructure.
Yes, I know the two proposals are very different, but they seem to have that much in common.
I hope it works out for them too; I'm of the view that we need to rethink global telecom policy in light of things like mobile broadband and the cloud. The challenge is that a lot of market damage can be done in 36 months! I wonder if reasoned debate might be necessary to create an optimum outcome for Europe and the US.
It is interesting to think about the old days of monopolized telecommunications and discover there were some pros! We see some replication of that in the US with government rulings about rural access to communications infrastructure -- and studies that indicate lack of access to the Internet is one reason that poorer children perform less well on standardized tests. I'd argue that it's scarcely the biggest factor, but every bit of assistance has to help.
Some of these programs, like the Australian example you cite, can take a lot of time to demonstrate results. It'll be interesting to see 12, 24, and 36 months from now what has happened--hopefully a lot of good things!
Absolutely, Alison! I think I mentioned the Australia experience in my blog here. They decided to create what's essentially a national infrastructure for wireline by buying out and running (via a not-for-profit) the low-level network. That was a multi-year political marathon and it involved only one country! It's also not yet clear whether it worked, meaning that it achieved anything useful.
I look back to the old days of regulated telco monopolies and I really wonder if we'd have been better off now had we just left them in place and regulated to secure the kind of infrastructure investment and service changes we wanted.
Lots of devils in lots of details in this case, I'd imagine, Tom! Think of the bidding process, the political shenanigans, the lobbying and so forth that would go on; not that it's a reason to stop doing this, of course! I can imagine the Chunnel created its own (smaller) nightmares, too! I'd guess there'd be one large contractor who worked with multiple large subcontractors, who in turn partnered with many smaller firms across the continent.
I think there's value in having shared or even government-supported infrastructure for wireline and wireless, but the devil is always in the details. Competitive overbuild is a cost but complacency underbuild is the risk!
It sounds promising and the European Union has certainly tackled plenty of other complex challenges, many quite well. It would be great news for poorer European nations, that's for sure.
The ThinkerNet does not reflect the views of TechWeb. The ThinkerNet is an informal means of communication to members and visitors of the Internet Evolution site. Individual authors are chosen by Internet Evolution to blog. Neither Internet Evolution nor TechWeb assume responsibility for comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and ThinkerNet bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
Recently, the Obama administration has been of two minds where privacy rights are concerned. On one hand, you have an administration that vowed to veto CISPA and mandated open data for government websites. On the other hand, you have an increasingly out-of-control Department of Justice on a fishing expedition at AP and demanding legislation to let the FBI wiretap private, encrypted communications and levy fines if a company fails to comply.
The apartment and house sharing service, Airbnb, now requires members to verify their identities by demonstrating a presence on the web, and by either scanning a government ID or entering detailed personal details. Other enterprises should take a close look at Airbnb's verification policies.
Facebook advertising is a lightning rod. It seems neither brands nor consumers are 100 percent happy about the social media site's policies, placement, or procedures. But the real controversy about Facebook ads and promotions is over whether they work.
By now, you've most likely heard about the 3D-printed gun that Texas-based Defense Distributed demonstrated last week. But we haven't heard the last about the censorship war that began soon afterward.
New York's Metropolitan Transit Authority is conducting a pilot test of digital kiosks to guide subway users to where they want to go more efficiently and at lower cost.
The whole Amazon.reader debate is a double-stupid. It's stupid to think that there's any e-book buyer who doesn't know Amazon's URL, and it was stupider to let ICANN launch the whole free-form TLD initiative to start with.
While NFC's original goal was to enhance mobile commerce applications, it is finding its way into a number of other uses, which is creating both opportunity as well as challenges for IT departments.
Enterprises would like to move to cloud computing but are hesitant because they are concerned about providers’ ability to secure company data. Here are some tips that help to ensure that if breaches occur, the business is not left holding the bag.
Edmunds separates customers into segments based on the info it collects on its site and from partners, and uses that to push out custom content, said Brian Baron, director of business analytics for Edmunds.com, at Predictive Analytics Innovation Summit.
The automotive website uses propensity modeling to target ads and customer registration forms, said Brian Baron, director of business analytics for Edmunds.com, at Predictive Analytics Innovation Summit.
Subsidized handsets, rather than locked handsets, should be the focus of regulators. We're not getting good deals, not fostering innovation, and weakening our power as buyers.
Expert Integrated Systems: Changing the Experience & Economics of IT In this e-book, we take an in-depth look at these expert integrated systems -- what they are, how they work, and how they have the potential to help CIOs achieve dramatic savings while restoring IT's role as business innovator. READ THIS eBOOK
your weekly update of news, analysis, and
opinion from Internet Evolution - FREE! REGISTER HERE
Wanted! Site Moderators Internet Evolution is looking for a handful of readers to help moderate the message boards on our site – as well as engaging in high-IQ conversation with the industry mavens on our thinkerNet blogosphere. The job comes with various perks, bags of kudos, and GIANT bragging rights. Interested?
To save this item to your list of favorite Internet Evolution content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
