@DrT - Thanks. I agree with your observations as well.  It is also transforming the skills needed to be a successful CIO.

@Taimur - sometimes the CISO function is part of a compliance function of all legal and regulatory requirements.  The same solution does not work for all organizations - it should be planned strategically.

Absolutely! I wonder how many organizations' c-level suite structures have remained unchanged for decades--or at least a long time? You'd think that it's time now to revisit the structure, including the reporting tree, to ensure that CIOs and other valuable IT executives are given equal footing to their counterparts in marketing, sales, and finance. You can't expect IT to be an integral part of business operations if executives aren't given the same visibility, respect, and responsibility.

Thank you very much for the article, Mansur. Interesting to read. Based on my experience, as you also mentioned, organizations have different reporting structure for CIO. The trend I see there is an expectation from the business that IT needs to be transformed from cost center to "Enabler". That requires CIO and other IT leaders start applying business centric thinking to their goals and objectives. Vision if IT has to align with the business's vision.

@Mansur: If CISO is not reporting the CIO, he would be reporting directly to the CEO then. In that case, the Information Security function becomes an independent department on it's own. This might add to the complexity in an organization's structure because normally organizations would want to limit the number of departments they have.

It's interesting to see the different structures but for me in tech companies internal IT strategy needs it's own leadership vs product or services strategies. If not internal IT will not get the attention it deserves and security risks start to occur as well as down time for employees

No matter what kind of organization it is, in order to be fully effective, CIOs need deputy CIOs or other roles to perform operational duties.

@Taimur - if the organization believes that the CIO is ultimately responsible for security and the CIO is a strategic role then the CISO should report to the CIO. If the CIO role is operational, the CISO may report to a different segment and serve more as an organizational risk officer.  With such separation the CISO may be in position to audit the IT and all other departments for compliance. Sometimes this role has a privacy focus with a higher legal focus.  Sometimes the role may have a dual privacy and security focus (specially in healthcare) and it may require a two person team to perform this role appropriately.  Depending on the size, complexity and business focus of the organization, the appropriate arrangement should be consciously chosen.

"As the strategic CIO role started to emerge in some organizations, other organizations simply retitled the director of IT without understanding the difference between the CIO and the IT director"

@Mansur: While in many companies the role of IT director and CIO might differ greatly, some companies simply cannot afford to keep both these positions and the CIO is made to deal with the IT related day-to-day affairs as well such as hardware procurement etc. This also avoids conflicts in interests as well because they may be dealing with some common avenues.

@Mansur: Doesn't a CISO normally report to a CIO? Is there are reason why this should not be the case given that CIO is the overall in charge of all IT related affairs in the company.