The Macrosite for News, Analysis and Opinion about the Future of the Internet
Comments
Current display:       newest comments first       chronological order   threaded
Page 1 of 4   Next >
Joe Stanganelli
Thinkernetter
Thursday November 15, 2012 11:53:18 PM
no ratings

Of course, one can't necessarily rely on Google's continued existence when it comes to TLDs.

Besides which, a TLD with your brand name or other certain keywords in it is huge for SEO.

slfisher
Thinkernetter
Wednesday November 14, 2012 11:42:16 AM
no ratings

Kim, we won't know until we see the first round of responses back from ICANN, which IIRC is at the end of the month. But it will be interesting to see how they do it. URLs have had a lot of trouble with trademarks because, while you can have a trademark in one area without infringing on another area, it's more difficult with a URL that doesn't have areas. 

slfisher
Thinkernetter
Wednesday November 14, 2012 11:39:41 AM
no ratings

True, but if you come up with 87 different sites with Sony in the name, it might be hard to find the "right" one. But yes, even with very simple URLs now, I've heard that some people Google it rather than typing in the URL. 

Incidentally, Google put in bids on a number of gTLDs itself.

kq4ym
IQ Crew
Wednesday November 14, 2012 9:04:32 AM
no ratings

It's all getting pretty confusing. I wonder what the ROI would be for parking names? I

n my experience in Google searches, it's often faster to just search for what you're looking for in lieu of typing in a brand name url.

I suspect Google may just be purposely and cleverly making a Google search the best and fastest way to find just the page you want vs. going to a brand url and then trying to leap through pages to find the exact thing you're really looking for.

mhhfive
IQ Crew
Tuesday November 13, 2012 8:29:19 PM
no ratings

@Joe,

The trick is that the "printed stationery" analogy doesn't hold because ICANN isn't printing anything.. They're just reserving virtual namespace for your brand... if you don't buy it, it doesn't exist at all. 

But somehow if someone else buys Coca-Cola, ICANN isn't liable for that infringement either..? IANAL, but maybe it's got something to do with Section 230 and secondary liability?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_230_of_the_Communications_Decency_Act

Kim Davis
Thinkernetter
Tuesday November 13, 2012 4:42:40 PM
no ratings

ICANN also purports to be refusing applications which would be deliberately confusing -- as in cocacola.xxx, a porn site.  Again, I don't know how well that's working.

Kim Davis
Thinkernetter
Tuesday November 13, 2012 4:41:26 PM
no ratings

ICANN has set up a process for trademark infringement claims.  It knows it can't infringe trademarks.  How well that process is working, who knows?

Joe Stanganelli
Thinkernetter
Tuesday November 13, 2012 1:23:26 PM
no ratings

To my mind, I don't understand how ICANN can do this without being liable for trademark infringement.

You can't just print out several reams of stationery with "The Coca-Cola Company" printed on them, and then tell Coca-Cola that you're going to sell them to anyone and everyone unless the company agrees to buy all of your reams for $185,000.

So how can they get away with it with TLDs?

Alison Diana
Thinkernetter
Tuesday November 13, 2012 9:20:59 AM
no ratings

No, I don't think anyone would believe CocaCola.xxx was the "real thing," but Coke certainly would want to own anything with the .Coke URL; it wouldn't want Pepsi or RC (are they still around?) to own that domain. It's just more confusion: Think of WhiteHouse.com vs. WhiteHouse.gov. I know I've typed that in by mistake; I'm sure I'm not alone! This opens the door to a much bigger set of problems for companies, especially those midsize organizations that simply can't afford either the $185K minimum cost of entry or the subsequent upkeep. 

Joe Stanganelli
Thinkernetter
Monday November 12, 2012 11:25:04 PM
no ratings

Personally, I don't really get the big panic and rush to scoop up the .xxx domains for brands, for fear of pornographers ruining their brand.

1) Pornographers were against the .xxx TLD too; they prefer -- and will always prefer -- mainstream TLDs like .com.

2) Is anyone really going to go to cocacola.xxx and, if it's a porn site, really think that Coca-Cola is now in the business of peddling smut?

Page 1 of 4   Next >


The ThinkerNet does not reflect the views of TechWeb. The ThinkerNet is an informal means of communication to members and visitors of the Internet Evolution site. Individual authors are chosen by Internet Evolution to blog. Neither Internet Evolution nor TechWeb assume responsibility for comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and ThinkerNet bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
a moderated blogosphere of internet experts
Mary E. Shacklett
Social media has been with us for a decade -- but employer policies and the law are anything but firm about the most appropriate usage of this powerful tool.
Dan Cypra
Dan Cypra   5/23/2013   31 comments
Businesses often struggle to decide which domain to use. When it comes to purchasing a domain name, you have plenty of extensions to choose from, ranging from .com and .net, to .me, and even .mobi. But which one should you pick?
Matt Heusser
Matt Heusser   5/23/2013   13 comments
I've been writing about how the next evolution of the Internet might just be an advertising revolution, and how corporate IT can stay involved as the enablers and providers of the technologies that make this possible.
David Weldon
David Weldon   5/22/2013   15 comments
In the 1970 science fiction thriller Colossus: The Forbin Project, two giant supercomputers from the United States and Soviet Union secretly join forces to take control of the collective nuclear might of the two countries. In the film, the two machines discover each other's existence, communicate back-and-forth, share their collective data, and cut their human creators out of the process. It is the ultimate example of machine-to-machine communications, or M2M.
IETV: the thinkerNet on film
5
of
Kim Davis
Big-Data Can’t Always Sell Wine

5|21|13   |   2:23   |   4 comments


Whole Foods Global Wine Purchaser Doug Bell told me about some of the constraints on using analytics in the US wine market.
Paul J. Fleuranges
Digital Signage Keeps NYC Subway Straphangers on Track

5|6|13   |   3:51   |   No comments


New York's Metropolitan Transit Authority is conducting a pilot test of digital kiosks to guide subway users to where they want to go more efficiently and at lower cost.
Kim Davis
Fast Forward to the Future

4|23|13   |   2:29   |   20 comments


A look back at tech writing in the 90s makes us wonder where enterprise IT will be 20 years from now.
Mitch Wagner
Google Launches Its Most Depressing Service Yet

4|15|13   |   2:59   |   10 comments


Google's new Inactive Account Manager lets you control how Google disposes of your accounts when you die.
Second Shooter
Argument Over Top-Level Domains Is 'Stupid'

4|11|13   |   2:07   |   3 comments


The whole Amazon.reader debate is a double-stupid. It's stupid to think that there's any e-book buyer who doesn't know Amazon's URL, and it was stupider to let ICANN launch the whole free-form TLD initiative to start with.
Kim Davis
Ladies, Your Tablet Awaits

3|21|13   |   2:22   |   37 comments


ePad Femme is the world’s first tablet “made exclusively for women.”
Wisdom of the Big Chair
NFC Moves Into the Mainstream

3|20|13   |   2:16   |   No comments


While NFC's original goal was to enhance mobile commerce applications, it is finding its way into a number of other uses, which is creating both opportunity as well as challenges for IT departments.
Wisdom of the Big Chair
Integrating Security Into Your Cloud Contract

3|19|13   |   3:35   |   No comments


Enterprises would like to move to cloud computing but are hesitant because they are concerned about providers’ ability to secure company data. Here are some tips that help to ensure that if breaches occur, the business is not left holding the bag.
Brian Baron
How Edmunds.com Collects Customer Information

3|18|13   |   1:15   |   No comments


Edmunds separates customers into segments based on the info it collects on its site and from partners, and uses that to push out custom content, said Brian Baron, director of business analytics for Edmunds.com, at Predictive Analytics Innovation Summit.
Brian Baron
How Edmunds.com Uses Analytics to Customize Site

3|14|13   |   0:47   |   No comments


The automotive website uses propensity modeling to target ads and customer registration forms, said Brian Baron, director of business analytics for Edmunds.com, at Predictive Analytics Innovation Summit.
an IBM information resource
sponsored content
big blue blog
an IBM information resource
sponsored content
Expert Integrated Systems: Changing the Experience & Economics of IT
In this e-book, we take an in-depth look at these expert integrated systems -- what they are, how they work, and how they have the potential to help CIOs achieve dramatic savings while restoring IT's role as business innovator.

READ THIS eBOOK
your weekly update of news, analysis, and
opinion from Internet Evolution - FREE!

REGISTER HERE
Wanted! Site Moderators
Internet Evolution is looking for a handful of readers to help moderate the message boards on our site – as well as engaging in high-IQ conversation with the industry mavens on our thinkerNet blogosphere. The job comes with various perks, bags of kudos, and GIANT bragging rights. Interested?

Please email: moderators@internetevolution.com
Internet Evolution – not for thickies
Keep Critical Data With a Knowledge Management System
Taimoor Zubair
Fortune 500 companies lose at least
$31.5 billion a year by failing to share knowledge. A Knowledge Management System (KMS) can help companies significantly reduce these costs.

CLICK FOR MORE
M2M: Rise of the Machines? Not Yet
David Weldon
In the 1970 science fiction thriller
Colossus: The Forbin Project, two giant supercomputers from the United States and Soviet Union secretly join forces to take control of the collective nuclear might of the two countries. In the film, the two machines discover each other's existence, communicate back-and-forth, share their collective data, and cut their human creators out of the process. It is the ultimate example of machine-to-machine communications, or M2M.

CLICK FOR MORE
M2M: Rise of the Machines? Not Yet
David Weldon
In the 1970 science fiction thriller
Colossus: The Forbin Project, two giant supercomputers from the United States and Soviet Union secretly join forces to take control of the collective nuclear might of the two countries. In the film, the two machines discover each other's existence, communicate back-and-forth, share their collective data, and cut their human creators out of the process. It is the ultimate example of machine-to-machine communications, or M2M.

CLICK FOR MORE