The Macrosite for News, Analysis and Opinion about the Future of the Internet
Comments
Current display:       newest comments first       chronological order   threaded
ecsd
IQ Crew
Friday September 12, 2008 6:28:19 PM

The site lets you do so - I'll flag things I want people to read, besides which if the posts ever do get rated by anyone else, then they can start down from 5, rather than the first (and perhaps only such vote on the post) assigning the score.

It's up to the site. I'd as soon toss the rating system since it doesn't seem much used. I usually ignore the flags, but I'm always willing to give anyone points who bashes Microsoft loudly - even myself. :)

If you think it's crass to rate oneself - I can't disagree, but I've given you my reasons. The site ops could fix the code to prevent the author rating hirself - as I said, the ratings don't mean much. They're sort of gratuitously there, so I will occasionally gratuitously rate myself 5. I am even willing to rate myself lower as the case arises. I certainly deserve no better than 3 out of 5 for being such a broken record about anti-Microsoft, except that so few people openly hold my position, and until enough people wake up so that the radioactivity of MSware is completely common knowledge, I need to be one of the voices in the wind, repetition and all.

Rating systems in general can't help be a bit childish. You read a post that makes several points. What does "4" mean in that context? What is trying to be accomplished with ratings cannot be done in the way ratings are used. The lame excuse for them is that they reflect "popularity", and we excuse such ratings because, in fact, it's way too much work* to think of something more accurate and meaningful. It would be nice to abandon them on IE and see if anyone cares.

* A real rating system would be tedious to use. Nobody wants to be forensic when reading simple things and few people want to engross themselves in exhaustive studies of whatever the topic is - that makes a simple polemic a semester's course, we usually have too many other things to deal with.

===

Final note to jwallace: excuse me if we've argued about MS earlier and I've forgotten. You have no arguments to make that MS is "the better system." I predict that your defense is a combination of (1) taking things as they are for granted, (2) supposed 'ease of use' and supposed better support, (3) "it's not as bad as you say." For #1, if now MS has 92% dominance on the market, all that means is that MS has 92% dominance on the market - NOT that the product is any good. PanAm used to be a big airline, and they're gone. I hope the same for Microsoft. I'll point out that MS's occupation of the server market has never improved, whereas FreeBSD Unix went from 0 to 40% server market share. The people who have to pay real money and do real work for computing centers see how worthless MSware is. For #2, the simplest thing to point out is that systems that don't gratuitously fail and screw up don't need that much support to begin with. Let's not confuse the average person's unwillingness to partially relearn how to accomplish computer tasks with whether MS is "easier to use" - this returns to the fallacy popularity = quality. What do people learn in any "computer classes"? They learn how to use Microsoft Software. They don't get classes on "applications" and they're never shown any OS other than Microsoft. Of course they find other OSes 'different' and 'not exactly like Windows.' The only real equation here is popularity = propaganda - alternatives. For #3, argghh, I'm not going to recite the long list of MS malpractice and carelessness. There will always be "true believers" who somehow take it personally how bad MS is, they forget that they aren't the authors and they don't profit. For shareholders of MSFT, I suggest putting your money in a more socially responsible investment.

Wha?? Now I see someone has rated this 5 - it wasn't me. *sigh* games. I do hope they experiment with removing the monkey ratings for a while to see if anyone wants to pine away over them. Foo. 

jwallace
IQ Crew
Friday September 12, 2008 5:55:55 PM
no ratings

ECSD,

I often respect your opinions..outside of the Microsoft bashing. One question, it does not seem to be in your character to rate your own comments, why take to that disturbing behavior today? Only discredits your perspective on Microsoft being "only self important".

Ciao - I'm taking my life social in the real world tonight!

ecsd
IQ Crew
Friday September 12, 2008 5:32:48 PM

The poll associated with this topic excludes the one thing that people can do to STOP BOTNETS, see my earlier post here: GET RID OF MICROSOFT SOFTWARE. QUIT USING MICROSOFT SOFTWARE CONNECTED TO THE INTERNET.

At least 80% of the people who read this note are in a position to switch to Open Source software and be fully satisfied. Email, Web, and Office applications are 1:1 functional. No agency funded by public money should be using Microsoft software any longer - why dump good money on bad software plagued by security holes Every Single Quarter without fail (see CERT.ORG.)

If you want to STOP BOTNETS COLD, then GET RID OF MICROSOFT SOFTWARE on any PC that can access the Internet. That's all there is to it.

ecsd
IQ Crew
Friday September 12, 2008 5:07:44 PM

To be fair, I haven't watched the botnet material, and so my advice may be included therein without my knowing so. And then my next cruel remark would be unfair: I don't see any reference to the fact that BOTNETS are almost exclusively comprised of PCs that run MICROSOFT OPERATING SYSTEMS and MICROSOFT SOFTWARE. It is not "PCs" that get invaded: it is PCs that run GARBAGE OPERATING SYSTEMS*. There are effectively two operating systems families in the world: Microsoft, and UNIX. UNIX is impervious to the BS that assails Microsoft software - the swiss cheese BOTNETS are made of. All this hooey about BOTNETS is almost entirely OBVIATED once we get RID OF MICROSOFT SOFTWARE CONNECTED IN ANY WAY TO THE INTERNET. IBM has no love for Microsoft and should be working to help systems like Ubuntu supplant Microsoft: so their position should resemble mine (a strident call to eliminate MS garbageware), rather than just holding seminars about trying to protect oneself from BOTNET viruses.

From my blog WhatIWantToKnow.org:

The formal call for the removal of Microsoft-based software from the Internet

Saturday, November 3rd, 2007

Whereas, Microsoft continuously demonstrates an inability to produce software impervious to attack, as evidenced quarterly at CERT.ORG in bulletins addressing all of Microsoft’s operating systems, including their latest one; and

Whereas, viable operating systems supporting all common communications and business protocols produced by vendors other than Microsoft do not suffer such problems by several orders of magnitude; and

Whereas, the vast and overwhelming majority of breakins and subornations of user PCs, to serve as platforms for the furtherance of criminal interaction with and abuses of the Internet, concern PCs using Microsoft Operating Systems (Windows) or using Microsoft Software (applications on OS/X); and

Whereas, the continued presence of such insecurity on the Internet is a threat to national and international security and destabilizes and diminishes the value of the use of the Internet to execute commerce of all kinds;

Therefore, be it:

Resolved, that no network is secure which provides for the delivery of material from the Internet to a Windows PC or a PC using Microsoft software, NAT and DHCP notwithstanding; and

Resolved, that a simple and expeditious solution to the worldwide problems of “SPAM”, “spyware” and “ability to distribute the application of criminal processes worldwide”, is the enforced removal of all paths of connectivity between the Internet and any PC running Windows or other Microsoft software; and

Resolved, that the advice given to the general public should be to bite the bullet in defense of their sanity in particular and the operation of the Internet at large, and learn to use the now-emerged alternatives to Microsoft Software, in order to conduct their business free from the necessity to suffer the exposure to a continuous risk of the use of their property and access to the Internet to perform criminal activiities to benefit unauthorized and unentitled others.

=====

I say: FIRST get rid of MSware from the Internet. THEN see if you have anything left to speak of to mop up. Fix what's broken: band-aid regimes suck.

One final note: BOTNETS are why you get SPAM. There is exactly one person most responsible for this state of affairs, and that is BILL GATES. You may have noticed Bill now appearing in TV ads - this is a campaign to "humanize" him and to try to reform his image. Once people understand that BILL is why you get SPAM, they won't be at all impressed with the man any longer. The $billions he's donating now is money made from monopoly coercion of the market (Microsoft was CONVICTED IN COURT.) I see no reason to give him points for anything nice he's done until I see the general public aware of his FULL "record of service". 

* or systems for which patches have not been applied for known exploits. However, the fact is that people who take SCRUPULOUS CARE of their MSware PCs with hourly antivirus updates STILL GET INVADED, whereas Unix systems kept up to date will virtually never, ever be invaded. The system you use is up to you: make a better choice of PC software. Use Unix.



The ThinkerNet does not reflect the views of TechWeb. The ThinkerNet is an informal means of communication to members and visitors of the Internet Evolution site. Individual authors are chosen by Internet Evolution to blog. Neither Internet Evolution nor TechWeb assume responsibility for comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and ThinkerNet bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
a moderated blogosphere of internet experts
Dan Cypra
Dan Cypra   11/20/2009   3 comments
A picture is worth a thousand words, or so the old saying goes. So understanding how to use images in e-newsletters effectively is quite important. Here are a few tips to ensure that your images in email newsletters work to your advantage.
Gordon Haff
Gordon Haff   11/20/2009   1 comment
Arms merchant or army? That's a fundamental question for vendors in the cloud computing space. Do they just sell their tooling to any and all comers, who then become the actual purveyors of hosted infrastructure, developer platforms, and software? Or do they offer their own cloud-based services, perhaps even keeping much of their technology in-house for competitive advantage?
Mary E. Shacklett
With the value of toxic assets on the rise, large U.S. and European banks face many challenges on the road to recovery. Sharing key information may help these firms effectively track the way forward.
Matthew Fraser
Matthew Fraser   11/19/2009   5 comments
Most of us go through life knowing that we’re expected to learn from our mistakes and improve. Those who are more conscientious about learning and personal improvement usually reap greater rewards.
Mike Moran
Mike Moran   11/19/2009   12 comments
Marketers are known for exaggerated claims and stretching the truth just a wee bit. But most marketers I know truly believe in what they sell. Their aggressiveness is based on a confidence that what they are promoting truly benefits the customer.
IETV: the thinkerNet on film
5
of
2pm EST
Tue
Dec 1st
an IBM information resource
sponsored content
big blue blog
Todd Watson
Todd Watson   11/20/2009   Post a comment
While Google introduces its new Chrome OS (which I'm hearing will be widely available in one year?  Did I mishear that?), IBM announced 10 new products today to help companies using IBM System z mainframe technology.
white papers & case studies
an IBM information resource
sponsored content
Smarter Collaboration: How to Thrive in a Challenging Business Environment
Market conditions are changing faster than ever, and organizations need to improve their agility and adaptability in order to provide better service and improve processes. The ability to work with customers, business partners, and employees as effectively as possible - while at the same time holding down costs - is a key to success.

READ THIS eBOOK
your weekly update of news, analysis, and
opinion from Internet Evolution - FREE!

REGISTER HERE
Wanted! Site Moderators
Internet Evolution is looking for a handful of readers to help moderate the message boards on our site – as well as engaging in high-IQ conversation with the industry mavens on our thinkerNet blogosphere. The job comes with various perks, bags of kudos, and GIANT bragging rights. Interested?

Please email: moderators@internetevolution.com
Copyright © 2009 United Business Media Limited - All rights reserved.      About Us  |  Privacy Policy and Terms of Use  |  Contact Us
CMP Media LLC
Internet Evolution – not for thickies
what.the.ferraro
Facebook Lacks Social Skills

11|20|09   |   1:53   |   1 comment


Facebook's 'Suggestions' for users demonstrate how little social networking sites understand about true social relationships.
Singer at C-Level
Smart Grid Opportunities

11|20|09   |   2:49   |   No comments


Industry initiatives and government stimulus funds are giving enterprise software vendors a great opportunity to help build out and manage smart grid technologies.
Tom Nolle
Total Telephony Transcends Telepresence

11|20|09   |   2:11   |   2 comments


The problem with telepresence is that it's not universally accepted, because video calling isn't. While we can all do video calling, we also apparently worry too much about how we look. If we want HD telepresence in our future, we have to dress down, mess up our hair, and dive into our online life.
what.the.ferraro
ThinkerNet Wins Min's Award for Best Blogs!

11|19|09   |   1:13   |   4 comments


ThinkerNet wins the Min's award for 'Best Blogs' – Internet Evolution's fifth award this year!
Full Nelson
SanFran.gov

11|19|09   |   8:51   |   No comments


Fritz has an exclusive talk with the mayor and CTO of San Francisco about that city's latest e-government efforts.
Robert D. Atkinson
America Has Much to Learn About Digital Piracy

11|18|09   |   2:09   |   No comments


The US loses about $20 billion a year on pirated software, movies, and music. But public policy can help stem the tide of digital theft. For example, France has recently passed a 'three strikes and you’re out' law, whereby if after two warning letters an individual continues to download pirated software then his Internet access will be cut off. US policy makers should consider adopting similar policies.
Singer at C-Level
Connecting Stakeholders: Part 3

Part 3 of 3   |  
See complete series
11|18|09   |   2:09   |   No comments


Financial management planning does not need to include Voodoo economics, but it does help to tap into the knowledge base of your team through some sort of real-time system. We explore your options.
Reiter's Block
Tweeting for Customer Support

11|18|09   |   2:20   |   No comments


When Reiter gets incensed over incompetent Verizon FiOS order-taking and support, he broadcasts it via Twitter. Did it do any good? How should your company offer Twitter support? Watch this for all the answers.
what.the.ferraro
Dogster.com More Popular Than Gov 2.0

11|17|09   |   2:05   |   1 comment


A lot of attention is being paid to launching Gov 2.0 Websites, but these sites aren't attracting a lot of visitors.
Reiter's Block
Is the BlackBerry 9700 'Bold' Enough?

11|17|09   |   3:07   |   4 comments


The successor to the BlackBerry Bold 9000 – the Bold 9700 – will be available soon in the US. Is it worth upgrading? Reiter's got one, and offers advice.
TechWeb The Global Leader In Technology Media