It is common now to see young students spending hours and hours on some exchange internet websites. In fact, this new trend really scares me. They are meant to unite people but they do the contrary. As an educator, I think kids need more curricula on media literacy in general and awareness in internet anonymity in particular. However, if they are taught to keep internet anonymity, we are teaching them tell lies, which are banned in all their forms. Now what is the bottom line? Should we tell them that all internet users are phony, and so must they as well with the view of protecting themselves? I am afraid that will not solve the problem in that it increases the number of internet users with false identity because whoever around the game will be addicted, and will find it legitimate to play back once trapped. Or they will do it with the view of “protecting” themselves.

My name is not Najma. I prefere writing anonymously for security reasons. I hope that I will one day be able to use my real name, since I'm really hating Najma for getting all the credit!    I'm proud of being a Moslawi, but like the fact that  I was born in Baghdad: 1988, April, 23rd. But I'm originally from Mosul. All of my mother's family members were living in Baghdad since my grandpa moved to Baghdad in 1967 until 2003. I'm proud of being a Moslawi, but like the fact that I was born in Baghdad, beautiful (or was beautiful) Baghdad..         

On the Book Project     Above is a photo of the last two packages of books I have received. Five of them will be at the associate dean's office first thing tomorrow, and two (The Calculus and the Electronic Devices books) will accompany me through the rest of the year only to end up at the associate dean's office on their way to the library by the end of the year.  Also an Iraqi student studying in Canada has also been of great help to the project The address you should use for sending the books is:

The head of the civil engineering department [E-mail me to get names]
University of Mosul
College of Engineering
Civil engineering department
Mosul - Iraq

I will get mom to spend some more time to choose more books and magazine subscriptions maybe..

Please feel free to spread news about the project, or contact whomever you can. If there's anything else that needs to be explained, tell me, and I'll try to put more details about that.
A BIG thank you to all of you who have helped by either buying books or donating money to the project.
WE appreciate it.

Authenticity versus Anonymity    (not in this case)

Hi Jasper,

Thanks for your great reply. I think the very caption of the post has given us enough information as to the writer's bias in his analysis. By saying internet anonymity is a curse and not even mentioned the good side of being anonymous on the web is simlpy unaccepatable.

We are all aware of the crimes and mishaps committed by 'unknow' people on the web but that should not thwart people from frely expression their views on issues that they may not have the courage to express in the real life. What would happen to the internet if we take away all those user generated contents?? 

I do agree with you that it's just an issue of educating people on how they should be accountable of their actions on the internet. I came across these two posts and was really impressed with the approach of the writers:

 

Anonymity on the Internet Must be Protected

 

Anonymity Won't Kill the Internet

 

Anonymity, as you say, is causing great illnesses throughout the internet community. But anonymity also provides comfort, it allows some people to express what they really think, like, see.

It's not as common, or useful, in America since we don't have as many restrictions as some other countries. But let's think of someone in Afghanistan or some other country, anonymity is the only hope they have to express their beliefs.

We need to teach 'generation facebook' of the advantages of the internet, but also, and most importantly, the many disadvantages and problems.

In real life you are very well known (hopefully) by a select group of people and to a central agent of authority. Your anonymity grows with further people are from you. When you travel to a distant location you carry a passport that verified your identity to those with whom you want to become acquainted. So there are layers or levels of anonymity that function naturally in society and means and mechanisms that control the boundary between being known and being anonymous. The internet has kludgy means of mimicking the social aspects of community and authority, but they were developed without a holistic understanding of all the issues that are part of the complex web of social interactions we have developed over millennia.

 

 Sociologists might give us some guidance on how this should work. But I don't trust them because they often are really trying to engineer society to reflect their desires rather than study a living and very complex organism to understand it with the respect it deserves. (yes, that was a bit of rant)

 

The question raised is natural and logical. But the problem is not new to Web 2.0. It has occurred with consistent frequency ever since the first bumpkin fell off the turnip wagon...

Throughout history the line of misrepresentation between anonymity and personal trust has fallen in physical presence (the classic confidence game), mail, telegraph, telephone, even mass media. With each new medium, our species agonizes again over this question of what new opportunities exist to spam and scam. New rules emerge to define who we trust, when we trust, how we trust. Such will also emerge for the Public Network even though this silliness has been going on since the first BBS two decades ago...

There is no separate morality or peril for the Internet. If we have taught our children correctly in all other matters, they will know how to behave on and off line. Better that we teach them how to protect themselves...

And our legislators can continue to enact laws that serve no one but themselves. Where the freedom of the Public Network is concerned, it is not the government I fear...

That's the issue, abdlah.  I do agree there should be protection for children, but not anominity for adults.  Everything is part of the infamous permanent record once it goes on the Internet.  Having been accused of posting things I haven't, I've always thought it best to only post under my name.  I suppose, as has been said here, others can post as me, further complicating what's real and what isn't.  I don't think there is a simple answer to this issue (as evidenced by the thoughtful and long reply posts).

    I feel that most people who use chat rooms and blogs have a concern with identity theft more than an evil intent when they use false names and pics. I believe that it is up to the sites administrators to make it safer for the users by qualifying the users true ID, this can be done with today's technology. Yes it may take a user longer to join and they may find it frustrating, but what do most criminals do when the going gets rough, they get going. We just need to stop making it easy, and make it safer. Easy is great, crooks love it and thrive on it, so put in a few more steps to get safer user IDs, our children are worth it.

   I am also a strong believer in the fact that security and most importantly moral beliefs start in the home, get over your own childhood woes and think about the kids future. There future is ours too, stop being the friend and be a parent. I also say to the courts, c'mon, yes it is the first amendment right to say what we want but it dose not give us the right to slander and then hide behind a false ID. False IDs isn't that a form of terrorism?

   So, we need to teach our children safe ways to use the internet, morals, and how to get along with everyone. And the Internet needs to establish safer protocals in user inception.

   Teach the children right from wrong, protect your Identity, believe in GOD and our country, go green, and be safe.  Bill

While going through the post , one idea clicked my mind and I implemented a bit of it and the other bit is not justified , a sort of crime , a negative approach , a nuisance , a harm and the list goes on...

What I did?

I clicked on the picture of Andrew and saved it. Why? I liked his thinkings and apart from that I want to make an album of persons with their thoughts so that I could even recall when I refer it  (this idea came now only and I think I am not interested in implementing it) .Nice. No harm, great idea, a positive thing to do so that you can remember the views and even recognize the person who first initiated it.No harm,Right??So if the identity ( in this case name) is not correct how could I know if the person in the picture is Andrew or not? Is this pic of Andrew?And is the views of a person named Andrew?So , we should give the correct identity because there is no harm, Fine.

Here we contact each other by posting a comment. There is no need of personal identification correct or false no(Hope all have the correct identity , many of us have not given their pics but it is not an issue because we give importance to information).

There is another approach and obviously the other half which I did not do. I saved the pics and open any other networking site , give the name as XYZ , some PQR address, and some rubbish views. Then What?

If sometimes Andrew come across that site and sees the name , and the views , what will be his next move?What is the first thought comes in his mind?Will he enjoy surfing anymore? Tensed, Right?

Andrew is not tensed , why , he has seen lots of such things---Internet Anonymity. Someone without any intension submitted his pics and just for fun given some views.That person not necessarily his friend or  enemy , just a net surfer has did it without any particular intention to harm Andrew?Cool.  

But if something absurd is there which is not bearable Andrew will loose temper. He will file cases , and if somebody points him for the cause he will try to convince others that he has not did it and from now onwards he will not submit his pics on the net. A bit tensed?

 

The well awareness plays a major role. We know someone else could do a mischevious act on our behalf. This should be known to everyone so that if certain news could be there we should act accordingly.

If we consider  Megan Meier, she could not bear it and she hung herself. For the act of others mischieve she had to suffer. What would be the scenario if she could resist it calm herself , know about this threats and everyone by her side to give her strength(I am taking this case just for an example).

Take the case of the Law students. They filed a complaint against the administrators of the site. Why? Why did they not take their life? They were aware of the nuisances on the websites. AWAREness.

 

So, sometimes it is fine of being anonymous. Let your children know that there are such threats on the internet, so be cautious while giving your identity, chating to an online friend, give the credit cards information.

Who knows the person you are chating online with is not a person from other continent but a neighbours of yours who try to misguide you or it can be anything. Being a responsible parent now it is the time to make them aware of the ills of internet so that they will be cautious.

 

 

 

 

Just want to add- that is a great new definition of the generation.Will  use it in the articles( with references of course:)))))

Thank you for  the great term.