I was really tempted to go with "Superbowl.. what's that?" But even I know what that is even though I really can't figure football out even after having watched a good part of a game (just one, yes, that was enough). Anyway as for predictions, you can go with probability and be right most of the time, but you cannot be right all the time because sometimes the long shot does come in. One of the things that Nassim Nicholas Taleb stresses in his books is that he does not make predictions and doesn't trust anyone who does. In his Antifragile one he describes getting very upset about people listening to predictions from so-called experts. He wants to shout at them to check if all the predictions they have made in the past came to be.
Something else for my reading list! I was less impressed with Silvers' Obama prediction than some people, figuring that the president would get re-elected based on a lot of factors. His state-by-state analysis was insightful, but maybe I'm not that easy to impress?! Either way, I find analytics fascinating, useful, and very informative. But I still don't think you can take the human factor out of a game. When you have people playing a competitive sport, when one team is hungrier than another there is no way analytics can crunch that into the equation. And that's why I enjoy watching some sports (football not so much though!).
This clearly shows that technology can also go wrong sometimes. Analytics is very tricky thing, we have so much of data being generated, its hard to process all of it without introducing any errors. That is the reason I chose the option "Quite a bit, because it shows the technology's fallible"
One of the things that Nassim Nicholas Taleb stresses in his books is that he does not make predictions and doesn't trust anyone who does.
@Ariella, very good point. We should neither predict nor believe in predictions. Sometimes some predictions might come true because the probability of winning or loosing is 50-50% but its always very hard to predict each and every event correctly.
True. You certainly have a 50-50 chance of correctly predicting the Superbowl winner now! I used to do it based on team colors, depending on which colors I preferred. More often than not, the team with the prettier uniform won! (Hey, it's just as good a metric as any other for those of us who aren't particularly fond of football--unless it's the Buffalo Bills.)
"We should neither predict nor believe in predictions."
How can you say we should neither predict nor believe in predictions? Prediction itself is as old as the human race. On an individual level, everyoneone at some point in time wantred to know the future. It's just a part of human nature. We've seen astrology becoming in creasingly popular as more and more people become super curious to know the future.
From a business perspective, we are hearing a lot about forcast. I don't think there is a single business that does not do with forcasts. Over the years, forcasting has been predominatly a guessing game. However, with the advent of analytics, we are now seeing attempts to minimize the guessing aspect of forcasting. With analytics, we can now apply scientific principles to determine with some degree of certaintythe future outcomes of business decisions.
"He wants to shout at them to check if all the predictions they have made in the past came to be. "
So is it only on this basis that Mr. Taleb will believe in predictions? Well that scenario is the lofty ambition of analytics. That's were we are heading wioth this exciting but intriguing world of Analytics. Are we ever going to reach that lofty goal of been able to see all our predictions come true? I am afraid notbecause Analytics does not purport to be an exact science. However, it does gives us plenty of resources to make predictions look like a scientific process. It can only gets better with time.
The ThinkerNet does not reflect the views of TechWeb. The ThinkerNet is an informal means of communication to members and visitors of the Internet Evolution site. Individual authors are chosen by Internet Evolution to blog. Neither Internet Evolution nor TechWeb assume responsibility for comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and ThinkerNet bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
No year would be complete without a roundup of memorable social media meltdowns, from Facebook faux pas to epic Twitter tirades. We're not talking about ill-considered pictures, or posts that reveal you skipped the family picnic and lied about it. We're talking about big brands -- with much to lose.
You've heard the expression, "Out of the frying pan, into the fire?" Amazon lives in the fire. The e-tailer wins by keeping things hot for its competitors, employees, and itself, according to a new book.
Positec, a manufacturer of power tools for homes and commercial applications, achieves greater customer service flexibility and cuts hold times in half by using a cloud-based service to manage its call center.
Big-data and analytics tools enable marketers to understand customers as individuals, identifying unmet needs and addressing each customer as a "segment of one," says John Kennedy, VP corporate marketing, IBM.
Expert Integrated Systems: Changing the Experience & Economics of IT In this e-book, we take an in-depth look at these expert integrated systems -- what they are, how they work, and how they have the potential to help CIOs achieve dramatic savings while restoring IT's role as business innovator. READ THIS eBOOK
your weekly update of news, analysis, and
opinion from Internet Evolution - FREE! REGISTER HERE
Wanted! Site Moderators Internet Evolution is looking for a handful of readers to help moderate the message boards on our site as well as engaging in high-IQ conversation with the industry mavens on our thinkerNet blogosphere. The job comes with various perks, bags of kudos, and GIANT bragging rights. Interested?