The Macrosite for News, Analysis and Opinion about the Future of the Internet
Robert Housman

A PR Response to 'Facebookgate'

Written by Robert Housman
5/17/2011 48 comments
no ratings
DISCUSS     Email This

We’ve all read the "Facebookgate" story by now: Facebook hired mega-public relations firm Burson-Marstellar to launch a negative campaign against Google over privacy issues.

Burson is now trying to distance itself from the campaign and the client.

Burson’s statement after the story broke stresses this point:

The client requested that its name be withheld on the grounds that it was merely asking to bring publicly available information to light and such information could then be independently and easily replicated by any media.

Whatever the rationale, this was not at all standard operating procedure and is against our policies, and the assignment on those terms should have been declined. When talking to the media, we need to adhere to strict standards of transparency about clients, and this incident underscores the absolute importance of that principle.

Burson’s defense is pure nonsense. These people are the PR professionals. It is ridiculous to try to blame the client for leading you astray.

[Full disclosure: I have worked with people from Burson throughout my career and have great respect for the firm. Burson, obviously, did not approach me to write this.]

My company does public relations work for clients, including a number of tech firms. At various points in time, our clients have approached us with ideas, many good but some very bad. It is our job to guide clients and help them see what is the best approach.

But it is easy to see why and how Burson screwed up. A big, marquee client like Facebook walks in the door and you want to make them happy. They present you with an idea that is a ticking time bomb. However, you want the work, so you lose all sense of professional judgment and become the proverbial “yes man.” You get the business, but you hurt your client.

Here is what Burson should have said when Facebook walked in the door:

1. “As much as we want you as a client, we have to tell you that this idea has a 95 percent chance of blowing up in your face. For your own good we won’t and can’t do it this way.”

2. “Given all the heat you have taken about privacy, there is nothing wrong about you raising legitimate privacy and security concerns about your competitors and rivals. We can help you raise these concerns effectively, appropriately, and openly.”

3. “While this may make you feel better, and might even take some small measure of focus off you, it isn’t going to fix the challenges you face. Given your size, and given the enormous amounts of personal information you hold, there will still be serious concerns about your privacy and security policies and safeguards -- even if Google also comes more under the spotlight.”

4. “The most important thing you can do is to continue to take whatever steps you can to assuage these concerns -- and do a better job of explaining what you are doing. The key here is for Facebook to become more proactive in its approach -- rightly or wrongly, you appear far too reactive by responding to privacy and security issues after the fact. You need to leapfrog the dialogue and get out in front of this issue. Do something bold, earn some style points.”

5. “You are viewed in the totality of your business practices. And, you have taken a lot of heat, from the movie portrayal of the early days to the discussions around China and censorship. You have taken a number of actions that send a good message -- the $100 million to the Newark schools was extremely generous. However, these actions don’t have a tight fit to what you do. You need to be equally engaged and socially active closer to home. Look at how much mileage Google has gotten by being ‘Googley.’ We can help Facebook craft a more proactive, progressive business story based on what you are already doing and what we can help you do in the future. We can, in essence, change the image of the Website that is all about personal image.”

That would be a real public relations strategy to be proud of, one you wouldn’t mind seeing in the news.

— Robert Housman has more than two decades of experience in public policy and public affairs. He is a partner at Book Hill Partners.

DISCUSS     Email This
Current display:       newest comments first       display in chronological order
Page 1 of 5   Next >
Robert Housman
Thinkernetter
Sunday May 22, 2011 9:56:19 AM
no ratings

Slfisher

You are absolutely right about how Google played this.  though I'm not sure Facebook shot themselves in the foot--I think the target may have been about halfway up higher and on the backside...so to speak.

slfisher
Thinkernetter
Saturday May 21, 2011 8:28:48 AM
no ratings

I have to say that I find all the hand-wringing about this pretty funny. Yes, trying to pitch this secretly without saying who was backing it was dumb, and I'm sorry, it doesn't take much of a journalist to push back on this; the first question from *anyone* is going to be "Where's this coming from?" What's good here, and perhaps it's Soughian's reputation, is that a light got shone on it and people paid attention. 

Also, I haven't seen enough praise of *Google's* PR here. "We saw the emails purporting to be from Burson Marsteller. We have no further comment." Perfect. When your opponent is already shooting himself in the foot, stand back and let him reload.

Robert Housman
Thinkernetter
Friday May 20, 2011 3:39:25 PM
no ratings

Very well said Kim.  Couldn't agree more.

Kim Davis
Thinkernetter
Friday May 20, 2011 3:30:17 PM
no ratings

Ethics aside, it really is pretty much of a disaster when the strategy results in improved standings for your client's competitor and leaves your client looking shady.  Not exactly why firms pay Burson's high prices.

Robert Housman
Thinkernetter
Friday May 20, 2011 3:17:18 PM
no ratings

The theory worked well for Madonna.  Not so much for companies.

Rich Adler
Thinkernetter
Friday May 20, 2011 2:13:48 PM
no ratings

whatever happened to bad PR being good PR?

Robert Housman
Thinkernetter
Friday May 20, 2011 11:05:31 AM
no ratings

Rich, but isn't that really the point?  They didn't handle it, they botched it.  They got an unflattering story about themselves and their client.  They did succeed in making Google look sympathetic.

I'm not suggesting this would have been the right course, however success would have been if they had pulled off getting a bunch of negative stories about Google without any one knowing they planted them.

Kicheko
IQ Crew
Friday May 20, 2011 3:39:56 AM
no ratings

Many have agreed that the primary issues Facebook raised in this debacle were actually real issues of concern to people out there. I bet Facebook knew this too.

It is likely their reason for not going at Google the bold and decent way was because they felt guilty themselves of the same/similar mistakes. Hence they did not feel like they had the moral authority to point fingers on the issue. Yet they needed to do so to deflect some heat off themselves. A classic case of trying to cover one's sins with other people's sins.

Kicheko
IQ Crew
Friday May 20, 2011 3:35:36 AM
no ratings

...I may not have much, but my principles and reputation are worth more than all the money in the world and there is nothing in existance that would tempt me to compromise them...

Thirst for the extra dollar does get in they way of the morals of many. Also the spirit of sycophancy where one is not able to tell off the important guys lest they turn their backs on them for good.

Rich Adler
Thinkernetter
Friday May 20, 2011 12:46:07 AM
no ratings

hey Robert-

You definitely raise some valid points. In particular, the relevance of the situation to lawmakers and lobbyists who are fighting for stricter laws in favor of privacy.

However, the story as it has come to be, still doesn't sit well with me. Mainly being, its a story. It has a dramatic undertone and I just dont think its exactly how things went down. I know it may sound naive, but I believe that these people knew what they were getting into, on both sides.

Regarding your statement on how this reflects on Burson- you do have a good point that if they cant even handle their own PR, it certainly raises a competency issue. HOWEVER, think about it. Its now known to the world at large (the microcasm that pays attention to this PR spinned nonsense, myself included) that their client roster includes THE BIG GUYS. the big F. If they can handle the big F, they can handle your little 500 company's PR. I just dont buy into it.

Thanks for the article though and your thoughtful response- I really enjoyed it and found it engaging.

Page 1 of 5   Next >
The ThinkerNet does not reflect the views of TechWeb. The ThinkerNet is an informal means of communication to members and visitors of the Internet Evolution site. Individual authors are chosen by Internet Evolution to blog. Neither Internet Evolution nor TechWeb assume responsibility for comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and ThinkerNet bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
previous posts from Robert Housman
Robert Housman
As I noted in an earlier post on Internet Evolution, American society must eventually deal with an ever-growing digital record of people’s lives.
Robert Housman
Robert Housman   7/23/2009   16 comments
George W. Bush once said, “When I was young and irresponsible, I was young and irresponsible.” And that worked pretty well for his generation. After all, youthful excesses didn’t stop W from becoming president.
IETV: the thinkerNet on film
5
of
Kim Davis
Big-Data Can’t Always Sell Wine

5|21|13   |   2:23   |   4 comments


Whole Foods Global Wine Purchaser Doug Bell told me about some of the constraints on using analytics in the US wine market.
Paul J. Fleuranges
Digital Signage Keeps NYC Subway Straphangers on Track

5|6|13   |   3:51   |   No comments


New York's Metropolitan Transit Authority is conducting a pilot test of digital kiosks to guide subway users to where they want to go more efficiently and at lower cost.
Kim Davis
Fast Forward to the Future

4|23|13   |   2:29   |   20 comments


A look back at tech writing in the 90s makes us wonder where enterprise IT will be 20 years from now.
Mitch Wagner
Google Launches Its Most Depressing Service Yet

4|15|13   |   2:59   |   10 comments


Google's new Inactive Account Manager lets you control how Google disposes of your accounts when you die.
Second Shooter
Argument Over Top-Level Domains Is 'Stupid'

4|11|13   |   2:07   |   3 comments


The whole Amazon.reader debate is a double-stupid. It's stupid to think that there's any e-book buyer who doesn't know Amazon's URL, and it was stupider to let ICANN launch the whole free-form TLD initiative to start with.
Kim Davis
Ladies, Your Tablet Awaits

3|21|13   |   2:22   |   37 comments


ePad Femme is the world’s first tablet “made exclusively for women.”
Wisdom of the Big Chair
NFC Moves Into the Mainstream

3|20|13   |   2:16   |   No comments


While NFC's original goal was to enhance mobile commerce applications, it is finding its way into a number of other uses, which is creating both opportunity as well as challenges for IT departments.
Wisdom of the Big Chair
Integrating Security Into Your Cloud Contract

3|19|13   |   3:35   |   No comments


Enterprises would like to move to cloud computing but are hesitant because they are concerned about providers’ ability to secure company data. Here are some tips that help to ensure that if breaches occur, the business is not left holding the bag.
Brian Baron
How Edmunds.com Collects Customer Information

3|18|13   |   1:15   |   No comments


Edmunds separates customers into segments based on the info it collects on its site and from partners, and uses that to push out custom content, said Brian Baron, director of business analytics for Edmunds.com, at Predictive Analytics Innovation Summit.
Brian Baron
How Edmunds.com Uses Analytics to Customize Site

3|14|13   |   0:47   |   No comments


The automotive website uses propensity modeling to target ads and customer registration forms, said Brian Baron, director of business analytics for Edmunds.com, at Predictive Analytics Innovation Summit.
an IBM information resource
sponsored content
big blue blog
an IBM information resource
sponsored content
Expert Integrated Systems: Changing the Experience & Economics of IT
In this e-book, we take an in-depth look at these expert integrated systems -- what they are, how they work, and how they have the potential to help CIOs achieve dramatic savings while restoring IT's role as business innovator.

READ THIS eBOOK
your weekly update of news, analysis, and
opinion from Internet Evolution - FREE!

REGISTER HERE
Wanted! Site Moderators
Internet Evolution is looking for a handful of readers to help moderate the message boards on our site – as well as engaging in high-IQ conversation with the industry mavens on our thinkerNet blogosphere. The job comes with various perks, bags of kudos, and GIANT bragging rights. Interested?

Please email: moderators@internetevolution.com
Internet Evolution – not for thickies
Keep Critical Data With a Knowledge Management System
Taimoor Zubair
Fortune 500 companies lose at least
$31.5 billion a year by failing to share knowledge. A Knowledge Management System (KMS) can help companies significantly reduce these costs.

CLICK FOR MORE
M2M: Rise of the Machines? Not Yet
David Weldon
In the 1970 science fiction thriller
Colossus: The Forbin Project, two giant supercomputers from the United States and Soviet Union secretly join forces to take control of the collective nuclear might of the two countries. In the film, the two machines discover each other's existence, communicate back-and-forth, share their collective data, and cut their human creators out of the process. It is the ultimate example of machine-to-machine communications, or M2M.

CLICK FOR MORE
M2M: Rise of the Machines? Not Yet
David Weldon
In the 1970 science fiction thriller
Colossus: The Forbin Project, two giant supercomputers from the United States and Soviet Union secretly join forces to take control of the collective nuclear might of the two countries. In the film, the two machines discover each other's existence, communicate back-and-forth, share their collective data, and cut their human creators out of the process. It is the ultimate example of machine-to-machine communications, or M2M.

CLICK FOR MORE