For many marketers, much of the early excitement about the Internet came from the prospect of being able to track everything they wanted to know about their customers. This was particularly important during the first Internet Bubble in the late 1990s, when visitors, more than revenue, were key to so many business plans.
This desire to track Internet visitors generated the field now known as "Web Analytics," which refers to storing and analyzing massive log files that track users.
The changes in the Web analytics industry over time are a mirror of how the overall Internet has evolved. And it's time for another spurt of growth.
The industry was founded in 1993 with the advent of WebTrends, an enterprise-based software tool that read through massive server logs at the speed of molasses, often consuming a large piece of IT resources. The need for real-time storing and processing of data fostered applications for cloud computing -- which, in the late 1990s, operated under the auspices of application service providers (ASPs).
The leading tools of the Web analytics industry -- WebSideStory, Visual Sciences, Coremetrics, Omniture -- several years ago became ASP or cloud solutions. Indeed, even Webtrends, the initial market leader with its roots in enterprise software, would survive only by adding a hosted option.
These ASP solutions relied on JavaScript and cookies, an approach threatened by privacy fears in the early 2000s, when the U.S. government adopted a policy to ban the use of cookies on federal Websites. When the policy was instituted, it initially threatened to set a precedent for broader regulation of cookie use on the Web, but most commercial sites adopted public privacy policies to stem this furor, and the Internet continued to grow. This year, the Obama administration has been working to help crumble this cookie ban and allow government sites to begin learning from visitor behavior.
Having survived the early cookie wars, the Web analytics industry was one of the first to face the specter of “free.” In 2005, Google purchased the Urchin analytics package and launched Google Analytics, a free service whose availability prompts questions about the value of various recent industry mergers.
Whether Adobe or IBM have wasted billions or will prove they can survive even when competing with free remains to be seen. Even in this troubled economy, Web analytics has been one of the few areas where high M&A prices continue unabated.
What does this activity in the Web analytics industry mean? Is it, as some believe, a sign of less innovation as the larger firms like Adobe and IBM focus on profits to appease shareholders?
It’s time for Web analytics to evolve again with the Internet, just as it’s done over time. Most companies continue to be mired in counting clicks and views. But it’s time for some new, fresh takes on the process, particularly as Internet users are finally coming to understand that privacy on the Internet is quite limited and guided more by user actions than by regulation.
It will be interesting to see how the Web analytics industry takes the next step in its evolution, reflecting ongoing trends on the Internet.
— David Silversmith is Vice President Information Technology at FirstBook.org, an organization that provides new books to children in need.
Web Analytics makes perfect sense as long as it is applied keeping in mind the ROI /Cost to the Enterprise deploying the solution.All that data out there on consumers,somebodys Gotta use it.
As for Consumers-Do what I do.Clear your Browser cache every day and Use an Anonymizer...
Brian - great points. I'm not sure as I see these are different issues so much as a spectrum.
At one end of the spectrum is data, pure routine analysis. How many people visited. How many have this browser. How many have this screen resolution. This allows for reporting and tactical decisions.
At the other far far end of the spectrum is information - the result of analysis, A/B testing, real studies of what lures people into and off of the site. This information can be transforming - but requires the involvement, participation and support of both the business people/units and Information Technology.
The Amazons and Googles are on that far end of the spectrum - but so few other companies are and the Web Analytics companies have at least some of the blame for this as all too often they are not helping to migrate their customers from that tactical reporting end to the true business information end of the spectrum.
Web analytics (such as Gomez and keynote) offer great insignt into the customer experience on websites, page load and uptimes. This is very valuable for the IT professional who is monitoring uptime and can react to it. Also, Omniture (embeded tags) offers more marketing type of information that shows what links users click and when.
I think this thread may have hit a fork in the road with two different topics going. While I see the value of user information, I wanted to stop on the pure topic of web analytics for a moment longer.
It seems to me that in terms of web analytics--pure marketing evaluation to include abandonment rates and what lures people further into the site (I know there's more, hence my fork in the road comment)--the thought leaders aren't mainstream.
Yahoo has a genius studying how to paint the screen faster and some websites will email me with "Hey, you were about to buy--what happened?", but I don't see the art of constant analysis regarding ease of doing business on the web pervasively across industries.
So, David, do you see that differently? And, if my sense is right, why do you think that is? My hunch is that it seems theoretical when it is everything but that. Further, I think business people may see the value but need to pull IT along and have a hard time capturing the attention of their counterparts.
Receiving data from visitors is certainly not a right of a website - but it is often part of the exchange for free or discounted services.
Most web sites that are free to the consumer/visitor/user are actually paid for by an advertiser or business that can otherwise gain value from the visitor information.
Take car pricing - Kelley Blue Book and Edmunds and other services used to sell books and then CDs with pricing data (and they still do to a lesser extent) but their real business is now selling advertising on their web site. Because of that advertising they can provide the car valuations for free to the consumer. If you take away the data provided by visitors - the value of that advertising drops dramatically.
Even consider Amazon, with visitor information they are able to respond in ways that brick and mortar book stores could never do. A large part of their growth has been based on the ability to anayze visitor behavior and adapt their web site and what they stock, sell and feature.
If we stop making visitor derived data accessible to marketers - many a business plan will change. Imagine paying for Facebook or Google Docs or the many other "FREE" web 2.0 services.
Just because there is an internet that is used does not necessarily mean that the data that is derived from it has to be accessible by marketers. That was not anywhere in the plan when the internet was created. It's a nice afterthought and a nice fringe benefit, but I don't know if anyone deserves that data just because it can be had. And I am not sure it can be had in the way we want it anyway. Perhaps we work just as hard NOT to provide that data as we do TO provide it?
The saturation point may not be the "analytics" software -- which analyzes and data mines...but the paucity of data itself.
Cookies, in and of themselves, often do not say much about the user. Now in a very large portal site, you might only wish to know which widget sells better, or which image gets more clicks. However, as the web decentralizes into myriads of social networks and twitter threads, at the same time, one needs a rich appreciate of the customer.
In a social network -- the market research is the network. You learn about the customer by letting her tell you about herself...not by placing a tracking tag on the customers hide.
Chris, this consolidation certainly has a component tied to the "preverbal profit wall" that Adobe in particular is reaching. Adobe's profits are very much tied to software sales and then sales of software updates. Web Analytics are tied to annual renewals - a far more renewable revenue stream which is what Adob'e financial analysts were most likely attracted too.
It's also interesting to note that the founder of this industry was Webtrends. In 2001 NetIQ bought Webtrends and during their four year ownersthip tenure Webtrends sank from inudstry leader to the vendor of last choice. Times have changed and Adobe is a different company than NetIQ - but the industry experience does not speak well for a non-analytics company running a web analytics company.
I’m not sure consolidation is a particularly good thing in the analytic industry.I think it will stymie innovation and hamper broader metrics.
Both IBM and Adobe seem to believe there’s gold in them there nuggets, and those are fairly large bets they have made.I think what is really happening is more to your observation, David.These companies have hit the preverbal profit wall and are trying to appease shareholders with a new revenue stream.
Regardless, the consumer probably can anticipate another round of assault on their private data.
The ThinkerNet does not reflect the views of TechWeb. The ThinkerNet is an informal means of communication to members and visitors of the Internet Evolution site. Individual authors are chosen by Internet Evolution to blog. Neither Internet Evolution nor TechWeb assume responsibility for comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and ThinkerNet bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
Web 2.0 has created numerous scenarios in which enterprise IT policies are at odds with social media. But we are seeing the early signs that the social media vendors have realized that a new focus is required to sustain businesses as customers.
Every IT manager has had one of those late nights -- a server crashes, a software update goes haywire, an installation of a new product takes several hours longer than planned. We've all been there. But with new CRM technology from Microsoft, you might be greeted next morning by multiple vendors proposing new solutions for you.
There are people who are so concerned about their privacy and their anonymity that they want to remain completely anonymous online, yet they still want to take advantage of what the Internet has to offer. Is that possible?
While Google introduces its new Chrome OS (which I'm hearing will be widely available in one year? Did I mishear that?), IBM announced 10 new products today to help companies using IBM System z mainframe technology.
Smarter Collaboration: How to Thrive in a Challenging Business Environment Market conditions are changing faster than ever, and organizations need to improve their agility and adaptability in order to provide better service and improve processes. The ability to work with customers, business partners, and employees as effectively as possible - while at the same time holding down costs - is a key to success. READ THIS eBOOK
your weekly update of news, analysis, and
opinion from Internet Evolution - FREE! REGISTER HERE
Wanted! Site Moderators Internet Evolution is looking for a handful of readers to help moderate the message boards on our site – as well as engaging in high-IQ conversation with the industry mavens on our thinkerNet blogosphere. The job comes with various perks, bags of kudos, and GIANT bragging rights. Interested?
To save this item to your list of favorite Internet Evolution content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
Some thoughts on new tools that use the cloud for synchronization rather than storage, and how they might signal a shift in strategy for at least one software giant.
When Reiter gets incensed over incompetent Verizon FiOS order-taking and support, he broadcasts it via Twitter. Did it do any good? How should your company offer Twitter support? Watch this for all the answers.
The release of Microsoft's newest OS raises the question of the company's relevance in an era when Google dominates applications and search, and Apple runs circles around Redmond with its gadgets and user interfaces.
Google flexed its collaboration muscles at the Enterprise 2.0 conference with a much talked-about Wave demo, but is the cool real-time application too big a leap for ordinary work tasks?
Cloud computing is being dampened by the lack of local application support for offline use. Google's partnership with open-source should encourage it to build tight integration between Google Docs and OpenOffice, and thus boost the cloud and counter Microsoft at the same time.
The Google backlash continues. After seeing their Project 10^100 submissions disappear into the bowels of a Google server farm, a group of irate developers has started their own site to re-collect and vote on the ideas.
In the final episode of this series about the death of Internet anonymity, Saunders describes how the Internet of the future will start to attain a level of intelligence that requires no human intervention. Scary.
What can users today do to protect their online privacy? The simplest and most obvious option is to not use the Internet – at all. However, once all digital information is consolidated over the Internet, trying to protect digital identity by simply unplugging from the Internet becomes impossible – a fact that has manifest implications for civil liberties, Saunders says.
By 2011 the number of Internet-connected sensors will exceed 1 trillion, making your chances of doing anything or going anywhere unnoticed pretty much zero. Saunders talks about how the 'sensortization' of the Internet is eliminating the traditional divide between online and offline populations.
The 20th Century Internet was characterized by the ability to interact with other people and information on the Internet largely without anyone knowing who you were. The Internet of this century, conversely, will be defined by identity. Saunders explains how Internet users are unwittingly contributing to the demise of the anonymous Internet.
Industry initiatives and government stimulus funds are giving enterprise software vendors a great opportunity to help build out and manage smart grid technologies.
The problem with telepresence is that it's not universally accepted, because video calling isn't. While we can all do video calling, we also apparently worry too much about how we look. If we want HD telepresence in our future, we have to dress down, mess up our hair, and dive into our online life.
The US loses about $20 billion a year on pirated software, movies, and music. But public policy can help stem the tide of digital theft. For example, France has recently passed a 'three strikes and you’re out' law, whereby if after two warning letters an individual continues to download pirated software then his Internet access will be cut off. US policy makers should consider adopting similar policies.
Financial management planning does not need to include Voodoo economics, but it does help to tap into the knowledge base of your team through some sort of real-time system. We explore your options.
When Reiter gets incensed over incompetent Verizon FiOS order-taking and support, he broadcasts it via Twitter. Did it do any good? How should your company offer Twitter support? Watch this for all the answers.
The successor to the BlackBerry Bold 9000 – the Bold 9700 – will be available soon in the US. Is it worth upgrading? Reiter's got one, and offers advice.
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Email This
TWEET THIS
