The holiday season of 2008 finds more than 150,000 Americans serving in combat zones in Iraq and Afghanistan. For some, this is their third, fourth, or fifth Christmas (or similar holiday) spent away from home and family.
Technology is the thin tether that helps keep their lives together, but despite the proliferation of social media services, mobile devices, and high-speed networks over the past several years, issues of policy, security, and access still come between soldiers and their loved ones.
Sergeant Scott McManus of the Washington State Army National Guard was recently deployed to Iraq for his third tour of duty. He writes that soldiers have to register use of Facebook , MySpace , and blogs with the military for security reasons, adding that “the majority of soldiers do [not] have the time to keep up with such sites and blogs due to missions, maintenance, details, personal hygiene, meals, sleep, and, last but not least, communicating with loved ones back home via phone or IM.”
Gaining access to connections is no simple matter in overseas military bases in places like Iraq. “You either have to pay $75 for dial-up or wireless service that may have an inconsistent signal, or else go to the Morale, Welfare, and Recreation Internet cafe and be limited to 30 minutes at a time,” McManus writes from his station at Qayyarah Airfield West, some 300 km north of Baghdad, where lines for the few Internet terminals are often discouragingly long.
Security and control of information also pose barriers. Considering that a handful of digital photos taken by U.S. soldiers within the walls of Abu Ghraib prison in 2004 revealed shocking visual details of practices that did lasting damage to America’s image in the world, the military is understandably sensitive about the kind of information that troops capture on personal devices and share on public networks.
In 2007, the U.S. military banned the use of consumer social media and technology sites such as YouTube Inc. , ostensibly worried that videos contributed by soldiers might give away sensitive details about troop deployments, missions, and conditions on the ground. After more than a year, the Department of Defense finally unveiled the government-approved alternative.
TroopTube debuted in November, developed by MilitaryOneSource and funded by the Department of Defense. The site allows active-duty members of the armed forces, government employees, and their friends and families to upload and watch videos in the familiar YouTube style.
Videos are limited to five minutes or 20 Mbytes. All submissions are screened by government monitors who flag videos that reveal sensitive information, contain graphic violence and obscenity, or break copyright laws.
There are currently more than 1,000 videos being shared on TroopTube, ranging from public greetings to the troops from celebrities and sports figures, to personal family moments like a child’s birthday party or a heartfelt “I miss you” from a loved one.
While it’s encouraging that the Internet and social networking can help reduce the virtual distance between soldiers and their families during the long deployments fraught with fear, loneliness, boredom, and uncertainty, let’s not forget that there is another, simpler way to solve this problem.
Bring them home, with thanks and honor.
Peace on Earth, and happy holidays to the Internet Evolution community!
Terrific, substantive post, Jason... thanks for spelling out clearly and precisely the constraints under which military personal labor/live/communicate. Everyone on this thread seems to understand and agree with the need for some sort of filtering; your spelling out the letter and spirit of the law was even more helpful.
But just to be clear, the pencil-n-paper route you suggest is equal to the same controls and oversight as an electronic communication, right? Someone's got to be reading those letters too to ensure no sensitive information escapes.
Interesting Post Rob; RE: “While it’s encouraging that the Internet and social networking can help reduce the virtual distance between soldiers and their families during the long deployments fraught with fear, loneliness, boredom, and uncertainty, let’s not forget that there is another, simpler way to solve this problem. Bring them home, with thanks and honor.”
Great thoughts, but, the mission is long and arduous as our leaders have said. This is not an easy fight. This type of fight is unprecedented in scope; it’s frightening really…if you think about it. Freedom is never free; and let us never forget this idea nor these brave men & women serving. We have it pretty damn easy, even in these tough, trying times as free citizens, in a free country. Many in the Middle East have no where near the political, social, economic or even technicial freedoms that we enjoy (because of the sacrifice and continued vigilance of many) and I think that is a major reason for the rise of extremism in the Middle East. The troops do need to come home, but the enemy’s defeat or “containment” is of thee utmost importance to a secure, viable United States of America and a FREE world. Even Mr. Obama knows this.
As far as technical security of military personel, ”Loose lips sink ships.” In the modern technical age, loose zeroes & ones can get people killed. One of my great friends is an officer in the military, and did work in Army Intelligience as well, I’d strongly agree with posts by tdstamulis and Jason_13 – they summed up very well.
I have a huge amount of respect for those who have volunteered to serve in the armed forces, and I share the concern that they are being cut off from friends and family back home, but agree that their own safety is paramount. I have to wonder that a country that allegedly has the ability to pick spoken words out of millions of phone calls couldn't somehow come up with an automated screening/censoring of electronic posts. It's just an idea.
Scott just e-mailed me a link to your article. Now I know of trooptube.tv. I went to the site and signed up. It looks like all I can do right now is upload videos to one big pile of uploads. I don't have a video camera and I suppose I will have to direct people to my upload so they don't have to sift through all of them. The ability to upload photos and write a blog would be helpful. Maybe soon...
I've never logged onto Facebook or Myspace. Looks like I have some catching up to do in the social internet world. Scott and I were hoping to be able to IM eachother with video calls more often, but the technology just isn't available in Iraq, like your article said. It is really great to be able to get e-mails from him about twice a week and so far we have IMed about once a month. I can't wait to have him home and be able to rid the distance and technology barrier between us.
I understand that security is very important. I hope with the creation and monitoring of Troop Tube, that it will become more versitle and user friendly. I've heard too many stories of soldiers becoming estranged from their partners at home. It's very disconcerting and I'm sure is a major source of stress for the troops. I think that the internet should be used to it's full potential to allow us to keep in touch.
I encourage everyone to send care packages to the troops. Having the tactile items from home is another great source of comfort for those serving in foreign areas.
Thanks for the insightful post Jason. I guess something similar happens in corporate America, having to keep secrets about new products and new ideas before they come out to the public - obviously the consequences are very different.
I wonder if someday, when the internet is as ubiquitous as it could possibly be, we'll have to worry about soldiers doing some sort of 'twittering' about the battles they are in.
First - Thanks to all the soldiers, sailors, marines, and airmen! Your sacrifices are appreciated. Stay safe and come home proud.
Second, as a veteran of the Army, I can tell you that as military personnel, you have given up certain rights and liberties. There are limits on free speech.
If you're an officer, you are subject to Article 88, which basically prohibits you from speaking out in a negative manner against the President, VP, Secretaries, and even Governors. To do so can result in a military court martial.
As an enlisted service member, you are subject to Articles 89 and 91, which prohibit disrespectful and negative speech against superior commissioned and non-commissioned officers. An enlisted service member can be disrepectful to a civilian authority apparently, but I would advise against it.
The Internet, and its availability, presents some major challenges for the military. The intelligence alone that can be ascertained from even the most innocent postings is tremendous.
Having worked in the intelligence field, I can tell you that examining communications is key. A photograph of a soldier with a background can give indication of location. Names and descriptions of locations and activities can prove damaging.
The military must control these communications. Not so much to catch individuals doing something wrong, but to protect them and their fellow service members.
Before any of the soldiers complain about the cost of Internet access or the 30-minute time limit at the MWR cafe, let me tell you what it was like to get 10 minutes to try to dial home from Bosnia hopiing you would even get through. Sometimes it would take 9 minutes to get connected to the states and have one minute to say hi. As another poster said, "paper and pencil" was about the best we could hope for.
Unfortunately without some kind of monitoring service members can easily be lured into talking about things that are best left off of the internet. Even if the information that they release is technically unclassified what if the piece of information they provide is tied with information from someone else? We already know that China, Russia and Al Qaeda use the internet agressively what would preclude them from social engineering via FaceBook or MySpace?
I also feel it is very complicated for the military to allow the troops to have open use of the internet. I feel that trooptube will help since it is moderated. I do feel for the familes of the deployed troops who cannot always communicate with their loved ones. I think as the internet becomes more and more prevalent in the day to day use the military will allow the troops to have moderated ways to communicate with their families and still keep the secret things from getting into the wrong hands.
I empathize with all of you regarding your concern for the soldiers that are serving our great country and away from their loved ones during the holidays. I am also elated to hear about the DoD's "TroopTube" effort. It is a great addition to assisting soldiers and family members to stay in touch. However, I served in Iraq from Feb 2003 to Feb 2004 for OIF-1. Also, I ended up working at the CJTF Headquarters and saw how information is handled in "controlled chaos". Without order, there is anarchy and that is the last thing that the military and the soldiers need while there. When you join the military, you voluntarily suspend some of your rights afforded to you for the good of the mission and the soldiers that surround you.
I know that this is difficult for someone that may have never served, but it is a necessary requirement to protect all that are serving. I agree that the military can be heavy handed at times on how they deal with certain issues, but let's keep in mind that the DoD, does not always employ the brightest civilians that are advising our military leaders and has to do the best that they can with what they have to work with.
Another thing to keep in mind is that when I first arrived to Iraq in 2003, I did not have Internet access for almost four months. However, I still had a responsibility to let my family know I was safe. For the really young ones that read this, we called it "paper and pencil". Perhaps some of these soldiers could try that approach, because all you need is paper, a writing utensil and some light. Also, unless it has changed, it is also "free" when sending a letter from a war zone.
I think the access to the Internet should be controlled. What if one soldier decides to send pictures of strategic object to his family or another guy tells some secret information about the location of troops to his friends?
The interesting feature of Internet is that not only soldier and his friends receive information, but also Special Forces of the opposite side can receive it. Of course, we have different methods, like secret connections, but I doubt that Facebook or Yahoo Messenger are ready to provide good (in military sense) algorithms of data encryption, so that only sergeant and his relatives receive information during the communication.
The same is about visual images. They can give an excellent chance to the opposite side specialists to define the location of troops.
Army men are not free in their actions and have special instructions. But this is the price they pay for the honor to be the best of the best to defend the Nation and peace in the World.
The ThinkerNet does not reflect the views of TechWeb. The ThinkerNet is an informal means of communication to members and visitors of the Internet Evolution site. Individual authors are chosen by Internet Evolution to blog. Neither Internet Evolution nor TechWeb assume responsibility for comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and ThinkerNet bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
How would the industrial age have looked if Ford could have patented the concept of the assembly line? It probably would have looked a lot like the current stage of the information age, where broad patents over business practices represent the legal foundation of American intellectual property law as it applies to software. Now, the Supreme Court is hearing a case that could blast those foundations with a truckload of dynamite -- and no one has a clue how they might rule.
Surely one of the coolest and most talked-about events at last week’s Enterprise 2.0 conference in San Francisco was the demo of Google (Nasdaq: GOOG)’s new collaboration platform, Google Wave, during Wednesday morning’s plenary session.
The left-coast version of the Enterprise 2.0 conference kicked off at the Moscone Center in San Francisco this week. Even in the early going, a few key themes are starting to emerge that reflect the growing maturity of the field and the hard-learned lessons of practitioners:
How do you spell “Yahoo” in Arabic or Google a soufflé in Mandarin?
In 2010, the more than 5 billion non-English speakers in the world may get a chance to find out.
In a move sure to get knees jerking all over the Web, the investment arm of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency has taken an ownership share in Visible Technologies, a private firm that specializes in the monitoring of social media.
While Google introduces its new Chrome OS (which I'm hearing will be widely available in one year? Did I mishear that?), IBM announced 10 new products today to help companies using IBM System z mainframe technology.
Smarter Collaboration: How to Thrive in a Challenging Business Environment Market conditions are changing faster than ever, and organizations need to improve their agility and adaptability in order to provide better service and improve processes. The ability to work with customers, business partners, and employees as effectively as possible - while at the same time holding down costs - is a key to success. READ THIS eBOOK
your weekly update of news, analysis, and
opinion from Internet Evolution - FREE! REGISTER HERE
Wanted! Site Moderators Internet Evolution is looking for a handful of readers to help moderate the message boards on our site – as well as engaging in high-IQ conversation with the industry mavens on our thinkerNet blogosphere. The job comes with various perks, bags of kudos, and GIANT bragging rights. Interested?
To save this item to your list of favorite Internet Evolution content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
As enterprises leap into the Web 2.0 world of blogging, commenting, and social networking, just 'being there' won't deliver ROI. You may want a 'Web Evangelist' to systematically harvest the feedback in order to polish your product or service.
The city of San Francisco is on the leading edge of using the Internet to provide government transparency. It is providing WiFi for its have-nots, and its DataSF.org initiative is putting the city's valuable data back in the hands of its citizens, with innovative results.
What can users today do to protect their online privacy? The simplest and most obvious option is to not use the Internet – at all. However, once all digital information is consolidated over the Internet, trying to protect digital identity by simply unplugging from the Internet becomes impossible – a fact that has manifest implications for civil liberties, Saunders says.
By 2011 the number of Internet-connected sensors will exceed 1 trillion, making your chances of doing anything or going anywhere unnoticed pretty much zero. Saunders talks about how the 'sensortization' of the Internet is eliminating the traditional divide between online and offline populations.
The 20th Century Internet was characterized by the ability to interact with other people and information on the Internet largely without anyone knowing who you were. The Internet of this century, conversely, will be defined by identity. Saunders explains how Internet users are unwittingly contributing to the demise of the anonymous Internet.
More companies are trolling social networks to find and vet potential job candidates. Beware the pitfalls of blurring the line between personal and professional lives.
It is 20 years since the invention of the World Wide Web, and the Internet has changed beyond recognition since then. Steve Saunders peers into the future to predict what the Web will look like in another 20 years time – and he doesn’t like what he sees.
Industry initiatives and government stimulus funds are giving enterprise software vendors a great opportunity to help build out and manage smart grid technologies.
The problem with telepresence is that it's not universally accepted, because video calling isn't. While we can all do video calling, we also apparently worry too much about how we look. If we want HD telepresence in our future, we have to dress down, mess up our hair, and dive into our online life.
The US loses about $20 billion a year on pirated software, movies, and music. But public policy can help stem the tide of digital theft. For example, France has recently passed a 'three strikes and you’re out' law, whereby if after two warning letters an individual continues to download pirated software then his Internet access will be cut off. US policy makers should consider adopting similar policies.
Financial management planning does not need to include Voodoo economics, but it does help to tap into the knowledge base of your team through some sort of real-time system. We explore your options.
When Reiter gets incensed over incompetent Verizon FiOS order-taking and support, he broadcasts it via Twitter. Did it do any good? How should your company offer Twitter support? Watch this for all the answers.
The successor to the BlackBerry Bold 9000 – the Bold 9700 – will be available soon in the US. Is it worth upgrading? Reiter's got one, and offers advice.
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Email This
TWEET THIS
