“Sure, we can get people organized on the Internet, but how do we get them to vote?”
That must have been the question that political pros asked themselves in the years since the notorious implosion of Howard Dean’s Internet-driven bid for the presidential nomination in 2004. On September 25, Facebook gave them one good answer by debuting Register Now! -- an official voter registration application.
The app, powered by Credo Mobile, allows users to register to vote within Facebook. Users can also encourage friends to register via Facebook’s viral invitation channel. On the morning the application launched, Facebook registered more than 2,500 new voters and continued registering thousands of voters per hour in the days following, according to the blog Inside Facebook.
With millions of younger, Facebook-connected voters poised to make a dramatic impact on the 2008 election, the increasing integration of social computing technology with the nuts-and-bolts mechanisms of democracy is promising to revolutionize the political landscape.
This is a tremendously high-stakes game for the political parties. Over half of the so-called "Millennial Generation" (more than 80 million Americans born between 1981 and 2000) is now voting age, and the way they tilt will influence the partisan composition of the American electorate for decades.
According to Morley Winograd and Michael Hais, authors of Millennial Makeover: MySpace, YouTube & the Future of American Politics (2008), “The candidate who combines the newest in online campaign technology with a message that attracts Millennial voters will not only win the technology arms race, but also the presidency of the United States -- and partisan dominance in the civic era that is just around the corner.”
Politicians are paying close attention. Darcy Burner, a former software developer with a deep appreciation for the power of Internet technology, is running for Congress in Washington’s 8th district, in a rematch against incumbent Dave Reichert. Burner is a familiar name to the “NetRoots” community of online political activists, and she has successfully raised well over a million dollars online for her campaign -- at one point, tops in the country among Congressional candidates. She sees big potential in the Facebook announcement.
"I believe strongly in the importance of an active and engaged citizenry,” says Burner. “I’m excited by innovations that increase voter participation, particularly among younger voters. Young people have a huge stake in this election, and social networks like Facebook are an important way to bring the political process to them in ways that are relevant to their lives and experiences.”
Like many forward-looking political professionals of both parties, Burner and her team are eager to see the Internet bridge the last mile between capacity building and actual participation.
Internet writer Clay Shirky’s unsentimental judgment of Dean’s failed presidential bid is that he demonstrated the social organizing potential of Web 2.0 (in that case, Meetup.com), but not the political potential. At the end of the day, all the money and enthusiasm in the world means little if supporters don’t turn up and actually vote.
The importance of the Facebook online registration initiative obviously isn’t its technical dimension, which is fairly trivial. Rather, it’s the convergence of two very powerful forces: increased desire for political participation among the Millennial Generation, and the dominant consumer-facing social networking channel.
It’s also a harbinger of things to come. Today: Facebook-based voter registration. Tomorrow: secure and trustworthy online democracy via social channels?
— Rob Salkowitz is a writer and consultant specializing in the social implications of new technology. He is the author of Generation Blend: Managing Across the Technology Age Gap and co-author of Listening to the Future (both from John Wiley & Sons).
The relevance of Facebook, social networking, and web 2.0 tools in politics has come up a lot on this site in the last few months, with good reason because of the overall rabid interest in the election.
I have, on my rapidly growing to-do list, the transfer of an application we have done locally that I would like to see go nationwide, and I thought Facebook might be a good place. I did all the preliminary work to get it in motion, so I certainly agree with you that Facebook is a good method of reaching young voters, but it's kind of busy in the election world right now so I think it will stay on the "to do" list for a while.
In our community, we created a reverse polling place look-up feature (ours is at www.jocopolo.com) and we've made it available wirelessly through a shortcode. I don't think I'll get to it before the election for Facebook, but I can tell you that out of about 40,000 new registrations we have worked this year, none have come through the Facebook application you mention. (We've gone from about 320,000 to 360,000 registered voters in 2008 in Johnson County, Kan.). So, despite my own intuitive belief that Facebook is an effective method to reach voters and the anecdotal evidence you have, I'm not that sure that we will see any results.
I'm also interested in your statement that studies have show that partisan affiliations formed in youth tend to be durable over the voter's lifetime. I haven't seen those studies. I'm not doubting they exist--I would just like to read them.
Part of this, I think, is that the youth vote, the under 30 vote, the Facebook vote, the Gen Y vote, or any other way it is characterized is so broad, it's difficult to come up with actionable items, either in non-partisan get out the vote efforts or specific candidate initiatives.
I think the 18-20-year-old is much different than the 20-22 voter and the 22-25 voter. The 18 year-old is excited to vote, the 21 year-old may plan to vote but likely is at college and very well could be registered at home (finding out too late and thus having his or her vote not count at college) and the 22-25-year-old begins that youth drift from voting. Persons tend to become involved in voting again when they have a family.
The Facebook impact is one which I hope is broken down, state-by-state, county-by-county after the 2008 election. There is a new book coming out that I've ordered, but won't arrive until late November--The Myth of Digital Democracy by Matthew Hindman. I'm not even sure Facebook itself will be relevant in 2012, but hopefully some post-mortem studies will better determine if the medium is a relevant method to reach voters by then.
Excellent post ... as you say, the next few weeks will tell a lot of the story. I've been involved in a lot of social network activism this summer (for example as part of the One Million Strong for Barack group on Facebook and the Get FISA RIght my.barackaobama.com group that got a lot of attention in July), and the conditions are certainy right for major involvement by younger voters -- who continue to be marginalized in most online environments. Over the next few weeks, "election protection" and voter suppression are likely to be galvanizing topics, and these unifying causes where everybody has a stake are the ones most likely to get people to take action.
Well, we'll see in a couple of weeks. If the participation rates and the partisan split among the under-28 cohort resemble those forecast by Winograd & Hais (and reflected in the polls), the impact will be fairly obvious. Moreover, studies have shown that partisan affiliations formed in youth tend to be durable over the voter's lifetime. Considering the sheer number of potential first-time voters in this election, the effect could possibly be as dramatic as in 1932 and 1980. Each of those elections could fairly be described as "revolutionary" ("realigning" is the poli-sci technical term), in that they redrew the political map for decades. Whether people actually show up and vote - that's the big question! I've had that conversation with political consultants and campaigns, and you are not the only one to be skeptical.
Facebook is only playing at the margins this time around, but they're doing something fundamentally important by lowering barriers to formal participation. As Shirky says, when the costs of participation drop to near zero, that's when the big changes start to happen.
I still think this is all a bit idealistic. Re: "With millions of younger, Facebook-connected voters poised to make a dramatic impact on the 2008 election, the increasing integration of social computing technology with the nuts-and-bolts mechanisms of democracy is promising to revolutionize the political landscape."
"Promising to revolutionize" seems a bit far-fetched. "Might have something of an impact on," I think, is more accurate.
Nevertheless, the register to vote app is a very good idea. But it also reminds me of the Facebook Causes app which many people add to their profile without taking any further action.
The next step for Facebook users is, of course, actually going out and voting. What happens on Election Day will be a better determination of whether the Facebook voters are as serious about the actual election as they are about poking fun at candidates via microblogs.
The ThinkerNet does not reflect the views of TechWeb. The ThinkerNet is an informal means of communication to members and visitors of the Internet Evolution site. Individual authors are chosen by Internet Evolution to blog. Neither Internet Evolution nor TechWeb assume responsibility for comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and ThinkerNet bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
How would the industrial age have looked if Ford could have patented the concept of the assembly line? It probably would have looked a lot like the current stage of the information age, where broad patents over business practices represent the legal foundation of American intellectual property law as it applies to software. Now, the Supreme Court is hearing a case that could blast those foundations with a truckload of dynamite -- and no one has a clue how they might rule.
Surely one of the coolest and most talked-about events at last week’s Enterprise 2.0 conference in San Francisco was the demo of Google (Nasdaq: GOOG)’s new collaboration platform, Google Wave, during Wednesday morning’s plenary session.
The left-coast version of the Enterprise 2.0 conference kicked off at the Moscone Center in San Francisco this week. Even in the early going, a few key themes are starting to emerge that reflect the growing maturity of the field and the hard-learned lessons of practitioners:
How do you spell “Yahoo” in Arabic or Google a soufflé in Mandarin?
In 2010, the more than 5 billion non-English speakers in the world may get a chance to find out.
In a move sure to get knees jerking all over the Web, the investment arm of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency has taken an ownership share in Visible Technologies, a private firm that specializes in the monitoring of social media.
While Google introduces its new Chrome OS (which I'm hearing will be widely available in one year? Did I mishear that?), IBM announced 10 new products today to help companies using IBM System z mainframe technology.
Smarter Collaboration: How to Thrive in a Challenging Business Environment Market conditions are changing faster than ever, and organizations need to improve their agility and adaptability in order to provide better service and improve processes. The ability to work with customers, business partners, and employees as effectively as possible - while at the same time holding down costs - is a key to success. READ THIS eBOOK
your weekly update of news, analysis, and
opinion from Internet Evolution - FREE! REGISTER HERE
Wanted! Site Moderators Internet Evolution is looking for a handful of readers to help moderate the message boards on our site – as well as engaging in high-IQ conversation with the industry mavens on our thinkerNet blogosphere. The job comes with various perks, bags of kudos, and GIANT bragging rights. Interested?
To save this item to your list of favorite Internet Evolution content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
Evidence shows that you can tweet too much. Sites and services like Twitter and Facebook are a good place to reach your audience, but think quality over quantity.
A digital content market is emerging. Only two things are known about it: the first is that at some point the Internet will primarily become a paid network. The second known factor is that there are innumerable variables in the digital content market that have yet to be worked out. It’s not known, for example, exactly how users will pay for content (micropayments, subscriptions, bartering of farm animals, other).
Bad news! By eliminating the world’s digital divide we’re likely to create a new divide: the information divide, where we end up creating a two-tier Internet where access to 'quality' content is controlled and charged for by mega-corporations, and the gulf between information haves and have-nots is entirely dependent on how much money they have. This is, of course, an almost exact inversion of the current situation on the Internet – where access is expensive and content is free.
As enterprises leap into the Web 2.0 world of blogging, commenting, and social networking, just 'being there' won't deliver ROI. You may want a 'Web Evangelist' to systematically harvest the feedback in order to polish your product or service.
Good news! The cost of Internet infrastructure, services, and access devices has been plummeting at an accelerating rate over the last 10 years and will approach a point in the next 20 years where these technologies become so fantastically cheap that ubiquitous, low-cost, high-speed networks, storage, and access devices will effectively eliminate the digital divide for most of the world's population.
The problem with telepresence is that it's not universally accepted, because video calling isn't. While we can all do video calling, we also apparently worry too much about how we look. If we want HD telepresence in our future, we have to dress down, mess up our hair, and dive into our online life.
Industry initiatives and government stimulus funds are giving enterprise software vendors a great opportunity to help build out and manage smart grid technologies.
The problem with telepresence is that it's not universally accepted, because video calling isn't. While we can all do video calling, we also apparently worry too much about how we look. If we want HD telepresence in our future, we have to dress down, mess up our hair, and dive into our online life.
The US loses about $20 billion a year on pirated software, movies, and music. But public policy can help stem the tide of digital theft. For example, France has recently passed a 'three strikes and you’re out' law, whereby if after two warning letters an individual continues to download pirated software then his Internet access will be cut off. US policy makers should consider adopting similar policies.
Financial management planning does not need to include Voodoo economics, but it does help to tap into the knowledge base of your team through some sort of real-time system. We explore your options.
When Reiter gets incensed over incompetent Verizon FiOS order-taking and support, he broadcasts it via Twitter. Did it do any good? How should your company offer Twitter support? Watch this for all the answers.
The successor to the BlackBerry Bold 9000 – the Bold 9700 – will be available soon in the US. Is it worth upgrading? Reiter's got one, and offers advice.
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Email This
TWEET THIS
