As usual, the media got the message wrong. “The gloves are coming off!” screamed the headlines last week, after Les Hinton, the current CEO of Dow Jones and publisher of The Wall Street Journal, compared Google with a giant blood-sucking vampire.
Keynoting the annual PricewaterhouseCoopers Entertainment and Media Outlook event last week, Hinton, a more than 40-year veteran of Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. (NYSE: NWS), appeared to declare war on Google (Nasdaq: GOOG), literally presenting the search-engine leviathan as Count Dracula, sucking the sweet blood of poor innocent virgins (i.e., pure newspapers). Speaking with sexual explicitness, Murdoch’s loyal lieutenant suggested that, by appropriating headlines for services like Google News, Google’s links economy is “scraping and raping” the newspaper industry.
"As an industry,” Hinton explained, “we provide them with massive amounts of news, none of which they spend a penny creating."
When somebody as senior and trusted within News Corp. and as street-smart as Les Hinton starts making such violent public threats against Google, it’s obvious that Rupert Murdoch is gearing up to do business with the boys from the Googleplex. But it’s not the business of war that Hinton and News Corp. declared last week, but rather the more subtle business of peace.
As with Dracula, the richly complex 1897 novel by Bram Stoker, Les Hinton’s message to Google was actually the reverse of what initially meets the eye. Rather than taking off his gloves, Hinton was actually putting them on and transforming Google from the villain to the victim of the story.
“There is a charitable view of the history of Google,” Hinton explained to the media barons assembled at the PricewaterhouseCoopers event last week. “[It] didn’t actually begin life in a cave as a digital vampire per se. The charitable view of Google is that the news business itself fed Google’s taste for this kind of blood.”
So Hinton charitably acknowledged that Google is actually the innocent in the Internet drama. The guilty party, Hinton confessed, are the newspapers that stupidly gave away their content for free on the Internet, thereby addicting Google to unpaid news.
The real purpose of Hinton’s PricewaterhouseCoopers theatrics last week was to announce a new business model for Dow Jones, a model in which all the scraping etc. is turned on its head. It’s the classic walled garden paid model, of course, the model in which the newspapers reassert their right to charge readers money for access to their content.
“Dow Jones is just at the end of developing a new platform from which to conduct business on the Web,” Hinton announced to the world. “Imagine this future: The Journal is one of the many newspapers you might buy in one place and with one payment… Watch for it.”
Yes, Les, we are watching for it. This is major news for the news business. Dow Jones -- one of the world’s preeminent financial and news informational resources -- is building a paid version of Google News, an aggregation network (what in the 90s we called a “portal”) where consumers of news can buy high-quality journalism.
So where does this leave Google? And how does it change the workings of the links economy?
This is the paradoxical crux of the matter. The new Dow Jones platform will actually make Les Hinton, Rupert Murdoch, and News Corp. more, rather than less, dependent on Google. After all, how are news consumers going to be able to discover or access breaking news stories without a reliable search engine? Bing or no Bing, the ubiquitous Internet search engine will remain Google for the foreseeable future.
So Google -- which has never been in the content business -- will become the all-important vehicle that will deliver the punters to the Dow Jones walled garden of news. And here, I suspect, is the hand, rather than the fist, that Hinton was offering Google. The more news links the better, as long as those links lead to the paid content on the News Corp. platform. Instead of a war between News Corp and Google, therefore, Hinton was declaring the opportunity not only for peace but also for closer and more innovative business relations between these two intrinsically synergistic companies.
With the new Dow Jones platform, the scraping is about to go seriously digital. Hinton, Murdoch, and News Corp. have finally taken off their gloves. The only people who should be worried by this vampire 2.0 are all those lucky consumers who, over the last 15 years, have been getting their news for free.
— Andrew Keen, Silicon Valley author, broadcaster, and entrepreneur, can be reached on Twitter at @ajkeen.
But the WSJ has been doing this for at least a year now, I remember when they started charging for the premium content, you could still go through Google News and access the information (I think you can't anymore).
They just want the publicity, they know any publicity is good publicity - and even more if it has the word Google in it.
"As an industry,” Hinton explained, “we provide them with massive amounts of news, none of which they spend a penny creating."
uhm...no sir. google provides its users with a massive amount of **links** which it spends hundreds of millions of dollars indexing, storing, curating and serving to consumers. links which drive traffic to sites. traffic which is revenue.
just another self-referencing over-valuation of content and mis-understanding of roles and business models.
I think it is time to remind folks of this popular adage " If you can't beat them, Join them". This is excatly what the folks at News Corps and others are doing in over extending their dependence on Google. This does not make Google bad in any measure of the word. We simply have to understand the dynamics of the 'world order' that there always had to be a leader in any industry who possess tremendous influence. And as Andrew himself pointed out Google will continue to be that dominant player in this digital era in the forseeable future. No need to quib or go on irrelevant rant and trying to demonize a company that has significantly altered the internet landscape.
I totally support the initiative taken by Les Hilton and I believe it is a very timely move.
Andrew! Intersting post. I really liked Rupert Murdoch reaction:)))But I guess, as the history of such wars proved, it is better not to declare a war, but try to establish as strong connections as they can, so when News Corp will be absolutely useless because of the new technologies,may be Google decides to spend several million to keep News Corp alive.
Interesting post, Andrew. I couldn't agree more that the Dow Jones platform (News Corp's upcoming model) will likely rely on Google search more than ever before. They just needed to make someone a "bad" guy - in this case, calling google a blood-sucking vampire - to gear up their PR campaign on charging readers for their news content. But with this Dow Jones platform emerging, clearly google isn't the only vampire in this twilight saga - ironically, the worse one is probably News Corp. When Hinton implied that google wasn't to blame for free news on the Internet, it's almost like saying google, the "bad" guy, has been taking advantage of every content generator out there. But that's only partially true.. being a search engine, that's what google does - bringing a volume of traffic to those sites that provide content so that they can sell ads. Many even pay money for a little thing called search engine optimization (SEO) to ensure their free content gets more views, let alone complaining about the exploitation by the google news service.
"The only people who should be worried by this vampire 2.0 are all those lucky consumers who, over the last 15 years, have been getting their news for free." - exactly!
Not sure I totally agree that Google isn't a search engine. It may aggregate content, but it also offers search tools along with that. Search was a Google mission long before the hosts of midget bloggers hoisted it on their shoulders.
Perhaps Google has taken too much of its success as coming from its search capabilities instead of simply its aggregating capabilities. There, I would agree with you.
Google is not a "search engine" it is a "content aggregator".
A search engine is something that lets you pinpoint an answer to a question.
Google rarely, if ever, does that.
What it does do is gather large volumes of information based on your keywords.
That content is created by others. Although Google AdSense and other technologies presume to "share the revenue" because Google is not really a search engine, the targeting is usually way off the mark, hence my guess is there's a lot of churn and burn.
In the meantime, Google is riding on the shoulders of midgets (the blog writers, journalists and others who create the deliverables for Google) and its weight is starting to bother some people...
Andrew, thanks for noting what will be another milestone in the evolution of newspapers: The reliance on paid content, in which Google plays a major role.
At this point, the question isn't whether newspapers will evolve beyond paper; it is when will the leading papers start their online paid-content programs?
I suppose I accept the "handshake" proffered by Hinton in the guise of a headslap. But it's pretty subtle. It's hard to believe he wouldn't see the potential here, but to call this an invitation may be pushing it, in my view. Let's hope you're right.
The ThinkerNet does not reflect the views of TechWeb. The ThinkerNet is an informal means of communication to members and visitors of the Internet Evolution site. Individual authors are chosen by Internet Evolution to blog. Neither Internet Evolution nor TechWeb assume responsibility for comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and ThinkerNet bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
The problem with much analysis of the old-versus-new media wars (including some of my own, I confess) is that we always assume that there’s a moral struggle going on, that the real battle is between fairness and injustice, and that, in the best Hollywood tradition, good will eventually triumph over evil.
In an age of a myriad of media devices and platforms, what does the digital consumer want? The answer, in a word, is simplicity. When a consumer buys a book, a movie, a magazine, or a musical track, they want to watch, read, and listen to their product on every device and platform -- from their two-channel hi-fi to their home theater-powered television to their Internet-enabled computer to their 3G smartphone to their revolutionary new touch tablet.
Thus reads a thesis from American political scientist Robert Kagan, meaning that Americans are intrinsically warlike while Europeans are the natural pacifiers; Americans destroy things and Europeans fix them.
Good news for those with a religious faith in Sarah Palin: She’s done the impossible. Miracle of miracles, she’s made me -- the Antichrist of Silicon Valley -- fall in love with the Internet.
Smarter Collaboration: How to Thrive in a Challenging Business Environment Market conditions are changing faster than ever, and organizations need to improve their agility and adaptability in order to provide better service and improve processes. The ability to work with customers, business partners, and employees as effectively as possible - while at the same time holding down costs - is a key to success. READ THIS eBOOK
your weekly update of news, analysis, and
opinion from Internet Evolution - FREE! REGISTER HERE
Wanted! Site Moderators Internet Evolution is looking for a handful of readers to help moderate the message boards on our site – as well as engaging in high-IQ conversation with the industry mavens on our thinkerNet blogosphere. The job comes with various perks, bags of kudos, and GIANT bragging rights. Interested?
To save this item to your list of favorite Internet Evolution content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
Techies are going crazy over the possibility that Google might design and sell its own Android phone. Some writers say it's a very big deal. Reiter questions whether it will happen and, if it does, whether it even matters.
YouTube launches 'YouTube Direct' to give 'citizen' journalism a better platform and in so doing may just ensure that 'quality' journalism soon becomes a thing of the past.
Ray Kurzweil's Blio and Apple's iPad tablet will make it easier than ever to have books "read" to us, says Dr. Kim, who believes that talking tablets will become interwoven into our consciousness as we "merge" with the increasingly elegant machines we hold in our hands.
Research shows that the youth of today like Facebook – but not blogging or Twitter. Does that mean Facebook has won, or just that it's not yet out of favor? Will all the services we see today fade into Ovaltine-or-Wheaties status in just a few years?
What kinds of companies are doing the most innovation in the data center? Turns out it's midtier enterprises that are taking the "Just Right" approach.
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Email This
TWEET THIS
