The Internet is having the same sort of democratizing effect on religion as it’s having for publishing, music, and politics. Not only is it possible now for any person’s ideas about religion to quickly gain a following, it’s also possible for anyone to become a minister over the Internet, or even to start his own fringe or parody religion.
Today, there are a plethora of choices available to anyone looking for just the right religion to fit his beliefs and lifestyle. Here’s my quick survey of a few of the more notable alternative and parody religions with large presences on the Web.
Universal Life Church has been around for almost 50 years. The beliefs of the church are simply that followers should “do what’s right.”
Universal Life became popular as a result of its policy of ordaining anyone for free, without any requirements. Today, you can simply fill out a form on its Website to become a minister. The church also grants more advanced degrees -- including Dr. of Divinity and Dr. of Metaphysics -- which require the payment of small donations.
Another one of the older alternative religions on the Internet is the Church of the Subgenius, which started with a pamphlet in 1979 and became an underground movement in the pre-Internet days. With the help of BBS systems, email, Usenet, and, later, the Web, it became the first, largest, and most well known of the Internet’s parody religions.
The Church of the Subgenius is often seen as a parody of cults and evangelical Christianity. Like other religions that started as a parody, however, it also has dedicated followers. At the center of the church’s beliefs is the pursuit of Slack -- a mystical substance or quality that is generally defined as freedom, or original thinking, or the ability to get what you want without working at it.Becoming an ordained minister in the Church of the Subgenius (a proudly “for profit” religion) costs $30.
A more recent parody religion is the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster (FSM). FSM was started by Bobby Henderson in a letter he wrote to the Kansas School Board when they were deciding whether to teach Intelligent Design in schools in 2005. The letter threatened legal action unless equal time was also given to the “Pastafarian” theory of creation, which says that a Flying Spaghetti Monster created everything.
The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn’t currently seem to have ministers. However, you can buy merchandise at the religion’s online store.
The Church of the Invisible Pink Unicorn (IPU) states that their goddess is both pink and invisible. This paradox is meant to mock many such paradoxical religious beliefs. The IPU is often used by atheists to illustrate their point that supernatural beliefs are arbitrary. By replacing the name of a deity with the Invisible Pink Unicorn, the argument is made that there’s just as much proof of the IPU as there is of any other supernatural being.
The IPU also doesn’t offer ordainment. However, like the FSM, IPU has a variety of products available for sale through its Website.
Perhaps the most uniquely Internet-centric parody religion is the Church of Google, which offers Google (Nasdaq: GOOG)'s omniscience and omnipresence as proof that Google is a God.
The old saying about not discussing politics and religion absolutely doesn’t apply to the Web. Whether you’re a believer, a non-believer, or just confused, you can find all sorts of religion on the Web -- for a very reasonable price.
The basic idea of religion is to give something for someone to
believe in, isn’t it?
So, I am not surprise by what Mr. Minnick shares with us. In
addition, many people use internet to look for something that they can be part
of or belong to anyway; I think if there is a second life network, there will
be the alternative Internet religion for sure.
Another fine example of how the Internet is a global stage
for those wanting to present to the world their ideas, beliefs, and creative
products/services.
Those churches of the latter days are motivated by personal gain and the internet just gives them the means to acheive their goal, that is to deceive people and entice them to believe what they should not believe.
Hounhosp, according to you Catholic Church should serve only in the name of God and rejects all the material things but this is one of the richest institution in the World- richer than Microsoft:). Of course, there are other people who waht to shear sheep and they are in much tougher situation that the first christians because "most of the seats are taken". I think it's just interesting to see new ways of " the right preaching" people use to make more people involved in their faith- for making money or something else.IMHO, it's really fasinating to see how the newest technologies are used for the oldest deeds!
p.s.
I know that religion is a very personal topic and I don't mean to be rude or disrespectful.
Hey, Chris! Your post is absolutely amasing( as usually:) and I am starting to think about becoming a first minister of The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster or if they don't let me do this, I will create my own church- Interent Evolution Temple, for instance- sounds not bad, doesnt't it?Or Ktulhu Church( if it doesn't exist yet)
But I was suprised by the reaction on your post! All these serious thoughts about God and Church!!!
Paul,Hounhosp- come on, guys- that's about fun and Internet opportunities- not about the religion!I think it's great, that people could go on-line and experiment with the religions...Rigid norms don't bring any good.Ever!!!Anybody! The God has the best sense of humor! Look at platypus(c).
Hail to you Chris! You are like the Internet- try people's boundaries:)))))
Those churches of the latter days are motivated by personal gain and the internet just gives them the means to acheive their goal, that is to deceive people and entice them to believe what they should not believe. But as it is writing, "You should know them by their fruits". The name they give themselves and their comportments is a tangible proof of "what they are" and people should be aware of how dangerous it could be to "put their souls" in the hands of those dangerous people. I do believe that everybody has the right to find the truth about one's destiny. But I also believe that there is a TRUE WAY to heaven and the true seeker will definitively find it.
There are "WOLVES in SHEEP'S CLOTHINGS" all around us. They profess to give happiness, when their motive is to earn money; they present themselses as "prophets", when they receive nothing from God, and they even present themselses as Gods. But they are mere "spaghetti monsters", that will eventually "vanish and go for jugement and damnation", the Scriptures say.
Man has always been in the quest to find a God and there is nothing surprising about the few non-traditional religions you mentioned. With the internet now at their disposal, it makes it easier for them to get world recognition. I believe that people should always have the liberty to choose who or what to worship. If peolple can choose to have a god who is fallible and inconsistent as they are, then why not proclaim themselves as god instead of wasting time building one.At least they can ask their kids and sibling to worship them!!!
I t's true that with the internet you can find whatever would satisfy your soulish cravings but i doubt whether too many people will fall for such human-made gods. I may be wrong but for the fact that this is the first time for me to hear about these 'religions" means they are having minimal impact. May be their only influence will be to provide 'ministers" who can join people:
The ThinkerNet does not reflect the views of TechWeb. The ThinkerNet is an informal means of communication to members and visitors of the Internet Evolution site. Individual authors are chosen by Internet Evolution to blog. Neither Internet Evolution nor TechWeb assume responsibility for comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and ThinkerNet bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
To many of us who got our start working on the Web in the 1990s, the 2000s may have seemed like a letdown. We had dreams of a Semantic Web, the Dow at 8 million, artificial intelligence, virtual reality, groceries delivered to our doors at the click of a mouse, and retiring at 30.
Misuse of the Internet in the workplace can be a real problem. Besides the obvious loss of productivity that occurs when an employee is logged into Facebook or sending personal emails while on the clock, there are potential legal and security-related reasons why an employer might need or want to know exactly what an employee is doing on the Web while at work.
Recent developments have thrown a wrench into a plan that would allow Apple iPhone users access to Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) voice services -- while calling attention to an issue of corporate governance for both companies.
A couple of weeks ago, in the first case to target the practice of a company posting fake positive reviews to the Internet -- or “astroturfing” -- Lifestyle Lift, a cosmetic surgery company, agreed to stop engaging in the practice and to pay $300,000 in penalties to the state of New York.
Smarter Collaboration: How to Thrive in a Challenging Business Environment Market conditions are changing faster than ever, and organizations need to improve their agility and adaptability in order to provide better service and improve processes. The ability to work with customers, business partners, and employees as effectively as possible - while at the same time holding down costs - is a key to success. READ THIS eBOOK
your weekly update of news, analysis, and
opinion from Internet Evolution - FREE! REGISTER HERE
Wanted! Site Moderators Internet Evolution is looking for a handful of readers to help moderate the message boards on our site – as well as engaging in high-IQ conversation with the industry mavens on our thinkerNet blogosphere. The job comes with various perks, bags of kudos, and GIANT bragging rights. Interested?
To save this item to your list of favorite Internet Evolution content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
In the final episode of this series about the death of Internet anonymity, Saunders describes how the Internet of the future will start to attain a level of intelligence that requires no human intervention. Scary.
What can users today do to protect their online privacy? The simplest and most obvious option is to not use the Internet – at all. However, once all digital information is consolidated over the Internet, trying to protect digital identity by simply unplugging from the Internet becomes impossible – a fact that has manifest implications for civil liberties, Saunders says.
By 2011 the number of Internet-connected sensors will exceed 1 trillion, making your chances of doing anything or going anywhere unnoticed pretty much zero. Saunders talks about how the 'sensortization' of the Internet is eliminating the traditional divide between online and offline populations.
The 20th Century Internet was characterized by the ability to interact with other people and information on the Internet largely without anyone knowing who you were. The Internet of this century, conversely, will be defined by identity. Saunders explains how Internet users are unwittingly contributing to the demise of the anonymous Internet.
Steve Saunders talks about the risks inherent in uncontrolled, widespread profiling of Internet users, and how one day this practice could form the basis of a new industry, the Outernet, which in economic terms will have outgrown the commercial value of the Internet itself.
Search companies and social networks are collecting incredibly detailed information about their users, says Steve Saunders, who predicts that these 'profiles' could one day become commodities to be bought and sold by companies on 'profile markets' or 'identity exchanges’ – the digital DNA equivalents of the financial and commodities exchanges on which stocks, oil, and gold are traded.
One of the most important Internet issues of all time is being ignored by the media. In this three-part video series Steve Saunders explains how search companies are turning the tables on their users by creating user profiles for financial gain, and how soon this trend will explode into full scale profiling.
Google's 'It Girl' talks about using personalized search to make sense of the mass of information on the Web – and how sometimes Google can appear to be semantically smarter than it really is.
Research shows that the youth of today like Facebook – but not blogging or Twitter. Does that mean Facebook has won, or just that it's not yet out of favor? Will all the services we see today fade into Ovaltine-or-Wheaties status in just a few years?
What kinds of companies are doing the most innovation in the data center? Turns out it's midtier enterprises that are taking the "Just Right" approach.
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Email This
TWEET THIS
