The Macrosite for News, Analysis and Opinion about the Future of the Internet
Quincy

Digital Media Is the New Hip Hop

12/3/2007 4 comments
no ratings
DISCUSS     Email This

Just a few years ago, when music artists and filmmakers would come into our office to pitch projects, their main selling point was “Man, I just sold 20K units out of my trunk in North Carolina; I’d love to partner with you to take it to the next level.” Today, the criteria have changed -- the new pitch is “Man, I just got 400K views on YouTube, and I have over 100K friends on MySpace; what can we do together?”

The entrepreneurial “hustle” spirit that Hip Hop is so well known for is rapidly moving from the streets onto the Internet, where distribution and creative marketing is free and available to anyone with a broadband connection. The fact that Web businesses can be run from a computer in your living room has leveled the playing field in that you don’t need much to get up and running. Nor are you judged by class or race. Even someone with a criminal record or bad grades can have a second chance online.   

You're not confined by geographical location.  You can sit by your computer in say, Watts or The Bronx, and your customers can be in Beverly Hills or vice versa.  It creates a bridge to communities and economies around the world you may not have had access to otherwise. This direct access to the global marketplace represents one of the biggest opportunities we’ve seen in a while, especially for lower-income households.

The general energy surrounding the Internet very much reminds me of the “freshness” and innovation that Hip Hop had in its early days. The same opportunity that Hip Hop represented to inner-city communities back in the 80s in way of exposure and revenue is now multiplied by the Web. Internet digital media is the new Hip Hop!   

The new pull marketing model
“Push” marketing (old approach) is when companies or artists used overt, heavy-handed marketing campaigns to push products and content to consumers from behind the walled garden of a network or radio station. It’s essentially a dictatorial approach, where the consumer is a passive receiver of proactive marketing messages. Prior to the Internet, when TV, radio, and printed press was all we had, it was easy to control the messaging in a marketing campaign from end to end. We had no choice but to believe them.

Today, however, with the Internet providing free global distribution and marketing to the masses, the garden wall has come down almost completely.  It’s becoming increasingly more difficult to dictate marketing messages and trends to this generation, as they can go online and get immediate “real world” feedback from their trusted peer group.   

Today’s consumers can smell a marketing angle from miles away and have grown wary of pushy mass brands. Given this paradigm shift, pulling your audience toward your product/brand via authenticity, sharing similar values, and maintaining ongoing dialogue (feedback loop) is going to be more effective. I call this “pull” marketing, because when you're on the same page as your consumer, trust is created and there’s no need to push. In fact, pushing may turn them off.

The pull generation grew up in a transparent world; artists can barely walk around the corner without ending up on the entertainment news site, TMZ.com. They’ve also grown up with freedom of choice and the ability to search and sample products prior to purchasing. Given this freedom of choice and transparency, they are more proactive in finding content and products. The pull preference is manifested in many ways. For instance, today’s generation is more attracted to custom t-shirts, shoes, and hats (digitalgravel.com), and less into the traditional mainstream mass brands as was the previous generation.   

Freedom of choice has made this generation even more wary of overt marketing, as they now know, more or less, what they like and where to find it. They can spot marketing techniques coming from a mile away, thus the push campaigns are becoming less effective. Maybe this newfound individuality will also increase creativity within the arts. If so, it may be a factor in bringing the entertainment industry to a healthier state. After all, everything is personal, from your clothes to the music that you like. Perhaps the walled garden has stood in the way all this time.

This shift also presents major opportunity for those who “get it.”   

I got my first real lesson in pull marketing by necessity. In 2000, after a successful 17-year run in the music business, having produced for Tupac, LL Cool, Ice Cube, and many others, I decided to make a career change into film and TV. I created a production slate of documentary treatments that we proposed to our distributor and closed an independent DVD output deal with a relatively modest budget. Void of major studio marketing muscle, we had to appeal to our audience through authenticity, quality, value, and organic promotion.

It was the pull model. Our very first QD3 DVD release set an initial shipment record for our distributor -- all without being too “pushy.” Word of mouth became our number one marketing tool, not our word alone. We’re now using the pull approach when rolling out our content/products across all platforms, including Internet, VOD, DVD, and mobile.  

New business models
We’re likely to see major shifts in entertainment industry business models. Now that we have access to free music, films, and software on the Web, what are some of the other models we should consider? One cool solution I’ve seen for music is a company called Skyrider.com.  They have essentially created a free legal downloading portal that inserts contextual ads on your download page based on your search criteria. It's a smart way to adapt to behavior. Although it may not be enough to save the majors, it could provide great opportunity for companies with low overhead or individual bands.

I can see artists figuring out a way to go direct to consumer, creating sites and virtual worlds where they can present their undiluted vision to their audience (with user input of course). Upon building a nice-sized audience, they may possibly have their albums and videos underwritten by brands that feel their products are aligned with the creative direction of the artists.   

Instead of pre-packaged albums, perhaps the artists upload songs, videos, and taped live shows periodically on their site as they finish them, and you, the consumer, can create your own track listing. Imagine your favorite group periodically releasing songs, using your input in part to make creative decisions, and thus having a more personal relationship with their fans. That could be pretty cool.

Many people are losing enthusiasm for music because they feel that most of it looks and sounds the same. For practical reasons, labels tend to encourage artists within a certain genre to work with the same small group of stylists, video directors, and music producers -- according to formulas that have worked in the past. This has created a pretty homogenized marketplace.   

In order to infuse new life to the industry, next-generation bands may want to consider including a Web designer, film maker, and clothing line designer as permanent band members that would create sites, visual media, and custom merchandise lines that become part of the group's creative rollout. This would give each group its own unique creative look and feel across the board.

Summary
The one thing I am certain of is none of us can afford to miss the opportunity that digital media currently represents. This is especially true in communities that are already at a disadvantage. It's time for the land grab. Find something that you’re passionate about, something that you are uniquely qualified to do better than anyone else in the world, and pursue it using online or wireless networking.

While the big corporations are trying to figure out how to bridge their traditional legacy with all the new opportunities that the Internet represents, smaller, more nimble companies currently have a nice window of opportunity to move faster in trying to create new models.   

I look forward to potential dialogues and collaborations at our site, QD3.com. I'm in the forums daily and look forward to hearing from you!

— Quincy “QD3” Jones III, Hip Hop filmmaker, producer, and visionary  

DISCUSS     Email This
Current display:       newest comments first       display in chronological order
The Philter
Thinkernetter
Tuesday December 4, 2007 6:17:39 PM
no ratings

Instead of pre-packaged albums, perhaps the artists upload songs, videos, and taped live shows periodically on their site as they finish them, and you, the consumer, can create your own track listing. Imagine your favorite group periodically releasing songs, using your input in part to make creative decisions, and thus having a more personal relationship with their fans. That could be pretty cool.

I love the thought of simply subscribing to artists, instead of waiting two to three years between albums. I'd happily pay them by the year, just a little bit per band/singer/whatever, so that I could access a catalog of old stuff and get new stuff as it's created.

Yes, indeed, that would be pretty cool.

A bit off point...

I have to disagree with one small point. I think packaging is just one thing that makes major music acts sound the same. The other is the lack of musicianship. A pretty big number of rappers and singers can't play a note, can't read music, and generally rely too much on sampling.

That's not to say they're not good at what they do, but it does speak to why so much of what they do sounds so much like what's already around.

And it makes The Roots, Gorillaz, and acts like that much more appealing because they truly have the ability to create their own sound.

-ph

Jasper Sluijs
Researcher
Monday December 3, 2007 11:05:25 PM
Hi Quincy,

As an insider in the music industry, you probably know what you are talking about more than anyone on this forum. I think you're right on in pointing out the current tendencies in which traditional marketing and distribution of music change through online technology. It's the same process we saw in the early days of Hip Hop, only on a much larger scale.

My question concerns your distinction between push and pull marketing. I agree with you that using the internet for one-way traffic marketing like on TV would be stupid. As a clever marketeer, you have to offer consumers to interact with your product, and the web greatly facilitates this. The thing that I'm having problems with in your argument though, concerns your statements that "The pull generation grew up in a transparent world" and "Freedom of choice has made this generation even more wary of overt marketing, as they now know, more or less, what they like and where to find it. They can spot marketing techniques coming from a mile away".

This I don't believe. Today's most effective marketing offers us a supposed transparency, in that it doesn't implicitly address the products it sells. These are marketing techniques that the targeted audience doesn't see coming from a mile away. Teenagers enjoying an episode of MTV's The Real World don't know that this is one of the most product-placed shows around. Skaters watching the hugely popular 'independent' skate documentary Dogtown and Z-Boys don't know that this flick was made possible by Vans shoes' marketeers.

So you're right, kids are getting more savvy and marketing can't underestimate its audience anymore. But marketing is far from transparent at the same time.
Jasper Sluijs
Researcher
Monday December 3, 2007 10:36:43 PM
To answer your question, Mashka, it is a remarkably consistent misconception that artists and musicians loose income due to file sharing and p2p networking. This vision presupposes that musicians make a significant amount of money through album sales that is now taken away from them because too many people torrent albums. This is simply not true.

Typically, recording contracts are extremely adverse for musicians. The advance they get from a record company in most cases barely covers the recording costs – for which the artists are responsible themselves. Free goods and promotional costs made by the record company are all charged off the musicians’ royalties from album sales, often even leading to recoupable debts – ergo no royalties at all. Only the most popular artists thus earn substantial revenues form record sales. Above all this, the record company will always exclusively own all copyrights of the recorded material. The only way in which reasonably successful artists can first pay back their debts to the record company before even thinking about gaining income for themselves, is by touring.

By file sharing and piracy only record companies suffer –for which I can't care less. For artists however, p2p is a great way to reach more people more effectively and distribute their music independent from the music industry –exactly what Quincy just stated, really.

All this, and more about the current economic processes in the music industry can be found in this insightful article by Stanford economists.
Mashka
Researcher
Monday December 3, 2007 2:04:20 PM
no ratings

Hello!

I realize the potential of digital media for  artistic realization. It' s really enormous.

"The fact that Web businesses can be run from a computer in your living room has leveled the playing field in that you don’t need much to get up and running. Nor are you judged by class or race. Even someone with a criminal record or bad grades can have a second chance online."

That is a very true.But I have a question.I only started to study the Internet and I discovered that one of the main questions that is discussed- the question about free access to information in the Net.If a person has a possibility to watch the video on Youtube and download any song or even albom from p2p or podcast-why does he or she pay? I am really interested how music artists get a profit  from digital media( of they do:)

 

The ThinkerNet does not reflect the views of TechWeb. The ThinkerNet is an informal means of communication to members and visitors of the Internet Evolution site. Individual authors are chosen by Internet Evolution to blog. Neither Internet Evolution nor TechWeb assume responsibility for comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and ThinkerNet bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
a moderated blogosphere of internet experts
Mary E. Shacklett
Social media has been with us for a decade -- but employer policies and the law are anything but firm about the most appropriate usage of this powerful tool.
Dan Cypra
Dan Cypra   5/23/2013   26 comments
Businesses often struggle to decide which domain to use. When it comes to purchasing a domain name, you have plenty of extensions to choose from, ranging from .com and .net, to .me, and even .mobi. But which one should you pick?
Matt Heusser
Matt Heusser   5/23/2013   7 comments
I've been writing about how the next evolution of the Internet might just be an advertising revolution, and how corporate IT can stay involved as the enablers and providers of the technologies that make this possible.
David Weldon
David Weldon   5/22/2013   15 comments
In the 1970 science fiction thriller Colossus: The Forbin Project, two giant supercomputers from the United States and Soviet Union secretly join forces to take control of the collective nuclear might of the two countries. In the film, the two machines discover each other's existence, communicate back-and-forth, share their collective data, and cut their human creators out of the process. It is the ultimate example of machine-to-machine communications, or M2M.
IETV: the thinkerNet on film
5
of
Kim Davis
Big-Data Can’t Always Sell Wine

5|21|13   |   2:23   |   4 comments


Whole Foods Global Wine Purchaser Doug Bell told me about some of the constraints on using analytics in the US wine market.
Paul J. Fleuranges
Digital Signage Keeps NYC Subway Straphangers on Track

5|6|13   |   3:51   |   No comments


New York's Metropolitan Transit Authority is conducting a pilot test of digital kiosks to guide subway users to where they want to go more efficiently and at lower cost.
Kim Davis
Fast Forward to the Future

4|23|13   |   2:29   |   20 comments


A look back at tech writing in the 90s makes us wonder where enterprise IT will be 20 years from now.
Mitch Wagner
Google Launches Its Most Depressing Service Yet

4|15|13   |   2:59   |   10 comments


Google's new Inactive Account Manager lets you control how Google disposes of your accounts when you die.
Second Shooter
Argument Over Top-Level Domains Is 'Stupid'

4|11|13   |   2:07   |   3 comments


The whole Amazon.reader debate is a double-stupid. It's stupid to think that there's any e-book buyer who doesn't know Amazon's URL, and it was stupider to let ICANN launch the whole free-form TLD initiative to start with.
Kim Davis
Ladies, Your Tablet Awaits

3|21|13   |   2:22   |   37 comments


ePad Femme is the world’s first tablet “made exclusively for women.”
Wisdom of the Big Chair
NFC Moves Into the Mainstream

3|20|13   |   2:16   |   No comments


While NFC's original goal was to enhance mobile commerce applications, it is finding its way into a number of other uses, which is creating both opportunity as well as challenges for IT departments.
Wisdom of the Big Chair
Integrating Security Into Your Cloud Contract

3|19|13   |   3:35   |   No comments


Enterprises would like to move to cloud computing but are hesitant because they are concerned about providers’ ability to secure company data. Here are some tips that help to ensure that if breaches occur, the business is not left holding the bag.
Brian Baron
How Edmunds.com Collects Customer Information

3|18|13   |   1:15   |   No comments


Edmunds separates customers into segments based on the info it collects on its site and from partners, and uses that to push out custom content, said Brian Baron, director of business analytics for Edmunds.com, at Predictive Analytics Innovation Summit.
Brian Baron
How Edmunds.com Uses Analytics to Customize Site

3|14|13   |   0:47   |   No comments


The automotive website uses propensity modeling to target ads and customer registration forms, said Brian Baron, director of business analytics for Edmunds.com, at Predictive Analytics Innovation Summit.
an IBM information resource
sponsored content
big blue blog
an IBM information resource
sponsored content
Expert Integrated Systems: Changing the Experience & Economics of IT
In this e-book, we take an in-depth look at these expert integrated systems -- what they are, how they work, and how they have the potential to help CIOs achieve dramatic savings while restoring IT's role as business innovator.

READ THIS eBOOK
your weekly update of news, analysis, and
opinion from Internet Evolution - FREE!

REGISTER HERE
Wanted! Site Moderators
Internet Evolution is looking for a handful of readers to help moderate the message boards on our site – as well as engaging in high-IQ conversation with the industry mavens on our thinkerNet blogosphere. The job comes with various perks, bags of kudos, and GIANT bragging rights. Interested?

Please email: moderators@internetevolution.com
Internet Evolution – not for thickies
Keep Critical Data With a Knowledge Management System
Taimoor Zubair
Fortune 500 companies lose at least
$31.5 billion a year by failing to share knowledge. A Knowledge Management System (KMS) can help companies significantly reduce these costs.

CLICK FOR MORE
M2M: Rise of the Machines? Not Yet
David Weldon
In the 1970 science fiction thriller
Colossus: The Forbin Project, two giant supercomputers from the United States and Soviet Union secretly join forces to take control of the collective nuclear might of the two countries. In the film, the two machines discover each other's existence, communicate back-and-forth, share their collective data, and cut their human creators out of the process. It is the ultimate example of machine-to-machine communications, or M2M.

CLICK FOR MORE
M2M: Rise of the Machines? Not Yet
David Weldon
In the 1970 science fiction thriller
Colossus: The Forbin Project, two giant supercomputers from the United States and Soviet Union secretly join forces to take control of the collective nuclear might of the two countries. In the film, the two machines discover each other's existence, communicate back-and-forth, share their collective data, and cut their human creators out of the process. It is the ultimate example of machine-to-machine communications, or M2M.

CLICK FOR MORE