When government officials talk about information “transparency,” they don't mean augmented reality (AR). But AR will play a major role in enhancing government transparency, although it won't be welcomed by many officials.
I continue to believe that, eventually, much of the world will wear these types of glasses. Perhaps in 2013 we'll see Apple's iGlasses.
Before iGlasses, though, the camera phone is becoming the AR device of choice. It's still very early days, but geekier cellphone users are downloading AR browsers and applications. One Washington organization, the Sunlight Foundation, recently offered a free AR app that's aimed, not just at geeks, but rather at policy wonk geeks. It works with Layar, the most well known AR browser, in conjunction with data from Recovery.gov, the U.S. government's Website about the economic stimulus funding. Layar is available for Android phones and the iPhone 3GS.
Recovery.gov provides details about the hundreds of billions in dollars in tax cuts, contracts, grants, and loans authorized under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Interestingly, one of the Act's goals is to "foster unprecedented levels of accountability and transparency in government spending."
If you walk down a street and point your camera phone at buildings, for example, you'll see blue circles on a map that indicate companies that received government assistance. The software displays the company name, amount received, and the distance from where you're standing.
It doesn't offer any more, but information can be filtered by amounts of funding and searched by company name. Funds have been provided to everything from power plants, state tourism offices, and railroads to automobile shops, Bible colleges, and Native American youth programs.
The Recovery.gov data is coded in the KML file format, which is designed to display geographic data in such programs as Google Earth and Google Maps.
The Sunlight mashup pales in comparison to the information available on Recovery.gov as well as the wealth of related information on the Web. However, it's just the first step in employing AR for government information.
The next step should be adding more data (either from Recovery.gov or from other sites), such as government agencies that provide the funds, categories of companies, how each company is supposed to use the funds, and who's managing the money within the company.
Ellen S. Miller, co-founder and executive director of the Sunlight Foundation, participated this week in an Internet Evolution podcast and online chat. She said Sunlight is working on an iPhone app about Congress, but didn't say whether it was AR.
Government stimulus funding is only one of thousands of types of government data that could be integrated into AR browsers. The details for every company or organization that has received any type of government assistance could be added. You could stand in front of a building, and see if AR information pops up.
Technologically, AR works better with advanced camera phones that have faster microprocessors, larger and higher resolution screens, GPS, and a compass. More accurate location technology would enhance AR's usefulness.
Obviously, there are serious privacy and security concerns about the ease of viewing government -- and personal -- data via AR. How much is too much?
But imagine pointing your camera phone at every bridge, tunnel, and highway to see details about pork barrel projects.
What if every citizen in every country could view information about wasteful government funding simply by pointing their camera phones? Many governments already censor the Internet. Perhaps augmented reality will be next on their hit lists.
No -- augmented reality has value. Every technology is hyped. Indeed, it seems that hype is required to generate enthusiasm -- not that I like hype or evangelism.
Today's AR apps are primitive. But that's today.
This isn't baloney. It's the real thing. The integration of the physical world with Internet data is simply a no-brainer and it will get better. It will just take time to develop to apps that cannot be duplicated with non-AR methods.
I certainly won't argue about naming. Augmented reality might indeed be quickly dismissed and another name used in its place.
However, augmented reality hasn't been going on for a while in any commercial setting, except in a few specific vertical markets, such as heads up displays on military planes.
Regardless of what hardware is used -- camera phones, eyeglasses, whatever -- integrating data into physical situations is going to happen for consumers. It's simply too useful and entertaining not to happen.
It will just take time to put together all the pieces.
Frankly, I think AR, as a term, is going to come and go very quickly. People might write about it every so often, but while the concept might remain in some form, it appears to be something that has been going on for awhile without a title.
Thanks for helping me make my points! As I've been writing in my replies to comments, before I just read your second comment, all technology takes time to develop and most (if not all) technology is disparaged at the outset because its purpose seems so unclear and its capabilities soprimitive.
My pleasure! Your article is a great one and as easy as it is to quickly dismiss AR as another passing fad, or as a marketing gimmick, my links and yours have a strong argument for the usefulness and future of augmented reality.
Everyone can have an opinion, but facts are facts and it is difficult to argue them unless one has something viable to counter it with instead of "I personally believe...".
Thanks for helping me make my points! As I've been writing in my replies to comments, before I just read your second comment, all technology takes time to develop and most (if not all) technology is disparaged at the outset because its purpose seems so unclear and its capabilities soprimitive.
With augmented reality, its value is obvious for those with the eyes to see and the brains to evaluate.
From a government perspective, I'd like to combine AR with facial recognition. Point your camera phone or your eyeglasses at a politician, and the recognition software will determine who the politician is and display information about him/her.
Obviously, this also could be done for other categories of workers. (Or, maybe, we'll just force politicians to wear large barcodes on their clothing!)
Marketers will have their fun as long as there are markets! And, to take a marketing perspective, people don't buy products, including useful ones, if they don't know they exist.
In any case....Many technologies are considered "overnight sensations," just like actors who have toiled for decades and finally become recognized for their talents.
Augmented reality has finally reached a point where there's a tiny bit of "there there." It's still in the baby steps stage or, perhaps, the baby crawl stage. But isn't that the way with all technology?
The key is looking at AR and pondering whether it makes sense and should be developed. It does and it will.
Yes, augmented reality is very hot now. Many bloggers and mainstream publications have written about it and even published special reports, such as the current issue of Business Week.
However, I'm enthusiastic because of its value, not because of the hype. It's not a solution looking for a problem but, rather, a solution to problems: Continuous viewing of information that will be invaluable for business and personal lives.
I agree that, so far, there is more hype than value -- just as there was with every other technology that has become invaluable, from telephones to computers.
Fast Company's headline is correct: AR is a fad now (an esoteric, techie-only fad), but it will become the future for mainstream consumers tomorrow.
The ThinkerNet does not reflect the views of TechWeb. The ThinkerNet is an informal means of communication to members and visitors of the Internet Evolution site. Individual authors are chosen by Internet Evolution to blog. Neither Internet Evolution nor TechWeb assume responsibility for comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and ThinkerNet bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
I am somewhat addicted to the Internet, and I like visiting Finland. But the Finnish government's declaration that access to broadband Internet is a legal right waves a red flag in front of many people, including me. That said, despite the inflammatory nature of the concept, it has more merit than you might think.
T-Mobile
customers with Sidekick cellular phones might have the dubious "honor" of experiencing one of the worst-ever consumer cloud computing meltdowns in the United States -- if not the worst.
While Google introduces its new Chrome OS (which I'm hearing will be widely available in one year? Did I mishear that?), IBM announced 10 new products today to help companies using IBM System z mainframe technology.
Smarter Collaboration: How to Thrive in a Challenging Business Environment Market conditions are changing faster than ever, and organizations need to improve their agility and adaptability in order to provide better service and improve processes. The ability to work with customers, business partners, and employees as effectively as possible - while at the same time holding down costs - is a key to success. READ THIS eBOOK
your weekly update of news, analysis, and
opinion from Internet Evolution - FREE! REGISTER HERE
Wanted! Site Moderators Internet Evolution is looking for a handful of readers to help moderate the message boards on our site – as well as engaging in high-IQ conversation with the industry mavens on our thinkerNet blogosphere. The job comes with various perks, bags of kudos, and GIANT bragging rights. Interested?
To save this item to your list of favorite Internet Evolution content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
In the final episode of this series about the death of Internet anonymity, Saunders describes how the Internet of the future will start to attain a level of intelligence that requires no human intervention. Scary.
What can users today do to protect their online privacy? The simplest and most obvious option is to not use the Internet – at all. However, once all digital information is consolidated over the Internet, trying to protect digital identity by simply unplugging from the Internet becomes impossible – a fact that has manifest implications for civil liberties, Saunders says.
By 2011 the number of Internet-connected sensors will exceed 1 trillion, making your chances of doing anything or going anywhere unnoticed pretty much zero. Saunders talks about how the 'sensortization' of the Internet is eliminating the traditional divide between online and offline populations.
The 20th Century Internet was characterized by the ability to interact with other people and information on the Internet largely without anyone knowing who you were. The Internet of this century, conversely, will be defined by identity. Saunders explains how Internet users are unwittingly contributing to the demise of the anonymous Internet.
The US loses about $20 billion a year on pirated software, movies, and music. But public policy can help stem the tide of digital theft. For example, France has recently passed a 'three strikes and you’re out' law, whereby if after two warning letters an individual continues to download pirated software then his Internet access will be cut off. US policy makers should consider adopting similar policies.
Is there such a thing as complete anonymity on the Internet? It is something of a philosophical question, but the consensus among experts seems to be 'No.' However, there are degrees of anonymity, which might be more practical for most people – and more necessary than ever before.
Routesy is an iPhone application that uses the phone’s GPS to let the user know where and when the next train or bus is coming. The application’s developer, Steven Peterson, talks about why a mobile application makes sense, especially given that this transportation information is already available on the Web.
Techies have been going crazy over the pending release of Nokia's N900 cellular phone, which incorporates a newly revised touch-screen operating system. Reiter's got one. Is the craziness justified?
The city of San Francisco is on the leading edge of using the Internet to provide government transparency. It is providing WiFi for its have-nots, and its DataSF.org initiative is putting the city's valuable data back in the hands of its citizens, with innovative results.
Industry initiatives and government stimulus funds are giving enterprise software vendors a great opportunity to help build out and manage smart grid technologies.
The problem with telepresence is that it's not universally accepted, because video calling isn't. While we can all do video calling, we also apparently worry too much about how we look. If we want HD telepresence in our future, we have to dress down, mess up our hair, and dive into our online life.
The US loses about $20 billion a year on pirated software, movies, and music. But public policy can help stem the tide of digital theft. For example, France has recently passed a 'three strikes and you’re out' law, whereby if after two warning letters an individual continues to download pirated software then his Internet access will be cut off. US policy makers should consider adopting similar policies.
Financial management planning does not need to include Voodoo economics, but it does help to tap into the knowledge base of your team through some sort of real-time system. We explore your options.
When Reiter gets incensed over incompetent Verizon FiOS order-taking and support, he broadcasts it via Twitter. Did it do any good? How should your company offer Twitter support? Watch this for all the answers.
The successor to the BlackBerry Bold 9000 – the Bold 9700 – will be available soon in the US. Is it worth upgrading? Reiter's got one, and offers advice.
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Email This
TWEET THIS
