The Macrosite for News, Analysis and Opinion about the Future of the Internet
Bill St. Arnaud

Government 2.0: The Next Generation of Democracy

Written by Bill St. Arnaud
5/16/2008 4 comments
no ratings
1 saves
DISCUSS   Digg   Del.icio.us   Reddit   Email This   TWEET THIS

For years, experts predicted e-government would be a driving force for broadband usage. The assumption was that many government services, from dog tags to taxes, could be done electronically over the Internet.  Despite modest success in this area, e-government hasn't pushed broadband usage. But now many pundits are starting to realize that the better value of e-government may be allowing the public to have greater input on government operations and processes.

One of the major problems with delivering e-government services is privacy and security.  Governments demand absolute security and privacy, which significantly drives up the delivery costs and/or makes it impractical to implement. On the other hand, e-commerce sites only need a modicum of security as business can budget for a limited of “shrinkage” due to electronic theft and misrepresentation, as in credit card payments, and so forth.  The loss of revenue from a single fraudulent transaction is nowhere as severe as the exposure of single tax-payer’s record.

Now, the goal is to use Web-based collaboration to "reinvent government." Well known author and futurist Don Tapscott advances this concept in his new research project called, Government 2.0: Wikinomics, Government & Democracy. A recent article in The Wall Street Journal reported, “Collaborative tools are changing governments. Technology makes it easy to publish information that used to be inaccessible. Chicagoans track crime by neighborhood, combining city crime statistics with Google's online maps. In Los Angeles, Neighborhood Knowledge California identifies communities at economic risk by tracking tax delinquency, fire violations and other signs of deterioration.”  And the list goes on.

Wikis and Web 2.0 technologies have the potential to fundamentally transform the way we are governed and radically reshape political philosophy. Not since the days of John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau have we had such opportunity and the tools to address many shortcomings of democratic society, especially the domination of special interests and lobbyists.

As Winston Churchill once commented, "Democracy is the worst form of government, but it is better than any other type of government we have ever tried." Government 2.0 represents an opportunity to redress the many shortcomings of the worst possible government we have -- democracy as we know it today.

So with next-generation government, using the new tools of Web 2.0 allows us to rethink some fundamental questions about governance and citizen engagement such as:

1. Why can't governments compete for my services? Is this fixed hierarchy of municipal, state, and federal governments necessary? Why not let governments of any strata issue vouchers for services and let me, the consumer, choose who is best at delivering those services. Perhaps federal governments would be better at processing drivers' licenses. Maybe municipal governments should look after healthcare, for example.

2. Governments always claim that taxes are "our" money, yet few of us feel any direct connection between our taxes and the services we receive. With today's computers and networks, citizens could be provided with individual accounts and track how their individual taxes are spent and disbursed. They may even be allowed to prioritize the areas of spending within their individual tax accounts. Ultimately, through their individual tax accounts, citizens can be allowed to vote with their wallets (which is generally more reliable than their brains) on the services that they deem most important to them.

3. Why not have neighborhood or personalized democracy? With these tools, maybe communities can elect to beautify neighborhoods using our tax dollars or accumulated value in our homes. We could elect to put flower boxes in front of every home, cobblestone the street, install fiber to each house, and so on. This would not only beautify the neighborhood but would significantly increase the value of our homes.

These are just some simple examples of the possibilities of applying Internet and Web 2.0 technologies to how we are governed.  We are only limited by our imagination, in optimizing the Internet as a new revolutionary tool to truly personalize democracy.  For more musings on this subject, please see my blog, Democracy 2.0 – Next Generation Democracy.

— Bill St. Arnaud, telecommunications analyst and frequent speaker on the future of the Internet and broadband

DISCUSS   Digg   Del.icio.us   Reddit   Email This
Current display:       newest comments first       display in chronological order
Borgan
Rank: Cave Painter
Wednesday January 7, 2009 12:23:22 AM
no ratings
This is happening on a grand scale. To see how it is being done, check out the international Metagovernment project and also their list of smaller, national projects.
Brian Newby
IQ Crew
Monday May 19, 2008 5:31:36 PM
no ratings
1 saves

Wow.  Your post opens up several wide areas for conversation that I think I'll mostly just call them out:  limiters for Government 2.0 are technical, resources, and public policy/philosophy (at least).

Technically, I think the mashup concept and the analytics that can come from government have huge potential.  Government agencies hold so much data and creative ways to use that data that helps citizens understand better what is happening in their community and where their tax dollars are being utilized is a great thing.  My hunch is that government agencies are more than happy to avail the public with the data (it's the law in most cases) but are resource-deprived to create these applications.  The visualization of the data may not always be pretty, but it might drive debate towards the best use of a what should always be considered a finite amount of tax dollars.

Having local governments take a crack at services sounds good, but some of the fall-out of community wi-fi underscores the risk.  It takes a community with a like-minded governing body and a solid foundation/competency to provide the service in the first place.  So, having agencies compete for services may be nirvana, but we might actually see agencies look to de-select services as an unintended consequence.

The personalized democracy concept is very interesting because often we see elected officials advocating putting a decision up toa vote of the people.  Elections are expensive and not many issues truly warrant an election, but you'd think more communities would use the Internet for advisory  polling, maybe even during council or committee meetings.  I know of a local council member who advocates his contituents watching the public meeting on television and texting him immediately with feedback as he is considering his vote on a position. 

James Johnson
Staff
Sunday May 18, 2008 10:29:16 PM
no ratings

Hi Bill,

Great post! A couple of your e-government examples are already taking place in municipalities across the U.S.

Allowing citizens to pay parking tickets online is probably one of the most common ways city halls are getting into the act.  

Now, all someone has to do is figure out a way we can contest a ticket via the Web instead of being required to appear in court on a set date and time (one of the all-time worst experiences). Webcams anyone?

James

Murugan
IQ Crew
Friday May 16, 2008 4:51:53 PM
no ratings

There certainly is much to be done in terms of returning to a government by and for the people.

Perhaps, we’ll see many more Web 2.0 sites that will provide the tools to engage citizens to actively participate in the government.

The following video of Ralph Nader and employees at Google involves the discussion of how technology needs to be able to make societal changes not just on the screen.

Ralph Nader visits Google's Mountain View, CA, headquarters as part of the Policy Talks@Google series. This event took place on May 12, 2008.

 

The ThinkerNet does not reflect the views of TechWeb. The ThinkerNet is an informal means of communication to members and visitors of the Internet Evolution site. Individual authors are chosen by Internet Evolution to blog. Neither Internet Evolution nor TechWeb assume responsibility for comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and ThinkerNet bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
previous posts from Bill St. Arnaud
Bill St. Arnaud
Bill St. Arnaud   10/16/2009   10 comments
I have long complained about the current generation of smart meters -- the new electronic devices that utilities are deploying in a number of trials around the world to replace the old analog electrical meters at the side of your house.
Bill St. Arnaud
The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) should go “back to school” to extend nationwide broadband in the U.S., working with the research and education (R&E) community on creative ways to roll out fiber-based Web services.
Bill St. Arnaud
As the year begins, it’s interesting to look at technologies that may truly affect the future of the Internet. I’ve chosen three that may have major implications for network bandwidth and the applications that will drive that bandwidth.
Bill St. Arnaud
A couple of studies -- issued years apart -- project that the Internet and information and communication technology (ICT) can have a bigger impact in reducing CO2 than either carbon taxes or cap-and-trade systems. The surprising element in each study is the degree to which the Internet and ICT might contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gases.
5
of
IETV: the thinkerNet on film
5
of
2pm EST
Tue
Feb 23rd
2pm EST
Thu
Mar 4th
3pm EST
Tue
Mar 9th
an IBM information resource
sponsored content
big blue blog
Todd Watson
IBM is announcing today the first of its Power7 processor-based systems and the Power7 processor itself at an event in NYC.
white papers & case studies
an IBM information resource
sponsored content
Smarter Collaboration: How to Thrive in a Challenging Business Environment
Market conditions are changing faster than ever, and organizations need to improve their agility and adaptability in order to provide better service and improve processes. The ability to work with customers, business partners, and employees as effectively as possible - while at the same time holding down costs - is a key to success.

READ THIS eBOOK
your weekly update of news, analysis, and
opinion from Internet Evolution - FREE!

REGISTER HERE
Wanted! Site Moderators
Internet Evolution is looking for a handful of readers to help moderate the message boards on our site – as well as engaging in high-IQ conversation with the industry mavens on our thinkerNet blogosphere. The job comes with various perks, bags of kudos, and GIANT bragging rights. Interested?

Please email: moderators@internetevolution.com
CMP Media LLC
Internet Evolution – not for thickies
Congress Hits the Snooze Button With China
Ira Winkler
In his
recent Congressional testimony, Dennis Blair, the U.S. director of national intelligence, stated that the U.S. is "severely threatened" by cyber attacks and that the recent Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) attacks should serve as a wake-up call.

CLICK FOR MORE
Rob Salkowitz
The Use & Abuse of BI

2|1|10   |   2:19   |   4 comments


Data mining of social networks means people might face unforeseen consequences as a result of their seemingly innocuous personal choices and associations.
Full Nelson
Unified Collaboration Telepresence: Part 1

Part 1 of 2   |  
See complete series
1|26|10   |   2:29   |   No comments


The promise of Unified Communications, Collaboration, and Telepresence are compelling, but it all sounds pretty pie-in-the-sky to the Admiral.
Marissa Mayer
VP of Search Products & User Experience, Google

11|3|09   |   1:57   |   No comments


Google Search Honcha talks about the new options the company has added to its search service, including fripperies such as the 'Wonderwheel.'
Steve Saunders' Outernet
The Death of Anonymity: Part 4

Part 4 of 4   |  
See complete series
10|29|09   |   1:40   |   7 comments


In the final episode of this series about the death of Internet anonymity, Saunders describes how the Internet of the future will start to attain a level of intelligence that requires no human intervention. Scary.
Steve Saunders' Outernet
The Death of Anonymity: Part 3

Part 3 of 4   |  
See complete series
10|28|09   |   1:35   |   4 comments


What can users today do to protect their online privacy? The simplest and most obvious option is to not use the Internet – at all. However, once all digital information is consolidated over the Internet, trying to protect digital identity by simply unplugging from the Internet becomes impossible – a fact that has manifest implications for civil liberties, Saunders says.
Steve Saunders' Outernet
The Death of Anonymity: Part 2

Part 2 of 4   |  
See complete series
10|27|09   |   2:08   |   8 comments


By 2011 the number of Internet-connected sensors will exceed 1 trillion, making your chances of doing anything or going anywhere unnoticed pretty much zero. Saunders talks about how the 'sensortization' of the Internet is eliminating the traditional divide between online and offline populations.
Marissa Mayer
VP of Search Products & User Experience, Google

10|26|09   |   01:20   |   4 comments


Google's Marissa Mayer explains how its partnership with Twitter both makes Google search more comprehensive and extends its social-networking reach.
Steve Saunders' Outernet
The Death of Anonymity: Part 1

Part 1 of 4   |  
See complete series
10|26|09   |   1:29   |   13 comments


The 20th Century Internet was characterized by the ability to interact with other people and information on the Internet largely without anyone knowing who you were. The Internet of this century, conversely, will be defined by identity. Saunders explains how Internet users are unwittingly contributing to the demise of the anonymous Internet.
Steve Saunders' Outernet
Search Inversion & Profiling: Part 3

Part 3 of 3   |  
See complete series
10|21|09   |   1:40   |   No comments


Steve Saunders talks about the risks inherent in uncontrolled, widespread profiling of Internet users, and how one day this practice could form the basis of a new industry, the Outernet, which in economic terms will have outgrown the commercial value of the Internet itself.
Steve Saunders' Outernet
Search Inversion & Profiling: Part 2

Part 2 of 3   |  
See complete series
10|20|09   |   1:29   |   1 comment


Search companies and social networks are collecting incredibly detailed information about their users, says Steve Saunders, who predicts that these 'profiles' could one day become commodities to be bought and sold by companies on 'profile markets' or 'identity exchanges’ – the digital DNA equivalents of the financial and commodities exchanges on which stocks, oil, and gold are traded.
Lee H. Berke
The Decline & Fall of Broadcast Television

2|9|10   |   1:00   |   No comments


Want to know the future of broadcast television? Take a look at broadcast radio’s past.
Tom Nolle
Everything New Is Old Again

2|9|10   |   2:13   |   6 comments


Research shows that the youth of today like Facebook – but not blogging or Twitter. Does that mean Facebook has won, or just that it's not yet out of favor? Will all the services we see today fade into Ovaltine-or-Wheaties status in just a few years?
what.the.ferraro
Email Marketing Gets Desperate

2|8|10   |   2:31   |   6 comments


Promotional emails will use just about anything timely to get people to buy things. Seriously, anything.
Steve Saunders' Outernet
America, Truck Yeah!

2|8|10   |   1:42   |   5 comments


Steve likes his new Dodge Ram 1500, but hates Chrysler's Web non-sales strategy. Rant on, li'l buddy.
what.the.ferraro
Twits Go Wild for Resignation Tweet

2|5|10   |   1:48   |   4 comments


Jonathan Schwartz is the first Fortune 200 CEO to resign via Tweet. Can he walk on water, too?
Full Nelson
Go With the FLO, Part 2

Part 2 of 2   |  
See complete series
2|5|10   |   2:17   |   3 comments


Fritz and his sweater continue their review of Qualcomm's FLO TV.
Singer at C-Level
Goldilocks & the Data Center

2|4|10   |   3:39   |   2 comments


What kinds of companies are doing the most innovation in the data center? Turns out it's midtier enterprises that are taking the "Just Right" approach.
Full Nelson
Go With the FLO, Part 1

Part of 2   |  
See complete series
2|4|10   |   2:39   |   1 comment


Qualcomm's FLO TV gizmo streams live TV shows. Tragically, they include the O'Reilly Factor
Eurotrash
High & Dry in Barcelona

2|3|10   |   1:08   |   No comments


Ray’s heading to Barcelona for the Mobile World Congress, and he’s not happy about it, the miserable git.
Sweeney Blog
No Sex, Please... It's the Super Bowl

2|3|10   |   2:24   |   2 comments


The Super Bowl ads that CBS rejected are turning up online, generating lots of attention but zero revenue for the broadcaster.