Email is my alpha and omega, my file-system and social register, my backup and my memoir. If I need to find a document, I don't search my hard-drive; I search my email for the copy I sent to someone when it was done. I sometimes write novels on email, sending out the day's pages to a mailing list of well-wishers who keep me honest, nudging me if I miss a page. Version control? Who needs it? Just find all the copies I sent or received and order them by date!
With several million pieces of archived email -- and hundreds of non-spam messages arriving daily -- you'd think that I was kind of guy who'd carry an email-based mobile phone, a crackberry or Treo or iPhone or what-have-you. You'd think that I ran some kind of IM in the background, and picked up the phone a dozen times a day to chat.
You'd be wrong.
I don't even have a menubar display that tells me when I have new mail. When I'm being disciplined, I keep my mail-fetch interval at one hour (though I usually end up resetting it to 10 minutes or even five).
You see, I love communicating too much to be interrupted. Whether I'm writing an essay or a novel, composing an email, or chattering with someone by voice, the last thing I want is to be given a jolt of useless adrenaline every time something new lands in my queue. Indeed, the oppressive weight of the knowledge that the queue is lengthening is enough to stress me out -- any time I go away for a day or a week, all I can think of is that mountain of mail accumulating on my server.
Linda Stone recently coined the term "email apnea," to refer to the involuntary holding of the breath on confronting such a mountain. Stone went on to note all the negative health effects arising from breathing irregularities and speculated that the stress of coping with mail-mountains would eventually come to light as a major health-risk.
So I eliminate the mountain: when I go away for an email fast (usually coinciding with a holiday), I set up an auto-responder advising correspondents that I'm away and that I “won't be reading their email” when I get back, asking that they re-send anything urgent after my return (I make sure a few key people, like my business-partners, parents, and agent know how to reach me by phone). When I sit down at my desk again after the break, I download all my mail while I have a little walk or tidy up my desk. Once it's all downloaded, I select every last message and delete them. No email apnea.
The mature information worker is someone who can manage his queues effectively, prioritizing and re-prioritizing as new items crop up, doing the fast-context-switching necessary to respond to an email while waiting for a file to download or a backup to complete. It's a little like spinning plates, and when you get the rhythm of it, it can be glorious. There's a zone you slip into, a zone where everything gets done, one thing after another clicking into place.
But once you add an interruptive medium like IM, unscheduled calls, or pop-up notifiers of mail, flow turns into chop. The buzz, blip, and snap of a thousand alerts turn plate-spinning into hell, as random firecrackers detonate over and over again, on every side of you, always there in your peripheral vision, blowing your capacity to manage your own queue as they rudely insert themselves into your attention.
For the brief time that I carried a crackberry in 1999, it was like someone had attached a slowly turning, inward-pointing woodscrew to the inside of the case, and every time it vibrated, the screw turned one half-twist, burrowing deeper into my hip and ratcheting through the nerve. Even once I'd turned off the vibe alert, there was the blinking light, and then, after I taped that over, the endless knowledge that the mail was spooling up there.
I'm an email pro and that means that any time I'm sitting down and in a position to answer mail, chances are I have my laptop in front of me, with full keyboard, searchable archive and macros galore. Getting mail while you're away from the keyboard might be nice if you get a few messages per day, or if you're trapped after an avalanche, but if you get heavy email load, it's the pits, a nagging reminder that there's stuff that needs doing that you can't do, even as you try to get something else done, a little nag that you can never fully silence, for the nag moves quickly from the device into your own subconscious.
There's a world of difference between queue-able and interruptive media, and we bridge it at our peril.
— Cory Doctorow, Internet activist, blogger, co-editor of Boing Boing
Hi Cory -- The observation that I've been chewing on recently is that I need a personal assistant, but can't afford one. The realization I had is that I should fill that dual role -- I can be the (self-)important person who needs an assistant AS WELL AS the assistant herself.
Back in the other lifetime when I was an executive admin, I'd never have let my helpless executive charges get interrupted as often as I now am in a day. I would shelter them, and give them their mail or calls or interoffice memos at the times that they'd arranged in advance.
I believe that deciding that my time is important and needs to be protected is going to be key to rearranging how I handle my research and social lives.
It's not just the email...it's the blogging, the blog readers, the research, the faffing about, the social networking and setting up profiles. I just wanted to post a comment on this post. I had to sign in...then create a profile...oh, I can't have a profile without a picture and la-li-la I should put my favorite movies...I've just lost an hour. And who says there is no such thing as time travel? I feel like I'm in an early William Gibson novel.
I totally agree with you on the point. And on the whole the post of Cory serves a prove that internet won't affect our lives on condition we don't let it interfere with it. No matter what internet product is under discussion - IM, Facebook or e-mail - the choice is still up to us..
Hi Nicole, Thanks for including the link in your reply; that was a good post. As your comment suggests it just may be that it is not all that important to people living in the digital age to be uninterrupted, thus at this juncture in evolution, that for the multi-tasker, concentration may be overrated, or on the other hand, that we under-rate uninterrupted communications in that we seem to have largely given up on it or seem to have forgotten about the importance of the related pleasures and peace (value). Thank you again for the comment and link.
I think it comes down to whether or not you want the
technology to dictate your life to a certain degree or you dictate how the
technology delivers information for you.
I'm glad you brought up IM here, because I wrote about this subject in an editor's blog not too long ago (IM: The Bane of the Workplace?) discussing the disruptiveness of IM in the workplace. Those on the message boards seemed to disagree, arguing that IM is an asset in the workplace because it allows you to stay in immediate touch with people outside of your office, get quick answers, etc. But it seems undeniable that it's interruptive. There are many organizations (like this one) that require that you remain on IM all day for work purposes, so it seems we're conditioning ourselves -- via mandatory IM, 24/7 email access, BlackBerries, etc. -- to work under disruptive circumstances. "Uninterrupted Communication" as well as one's ability to concentrate for an extended period of time has become, for the digital agers, overrated.
I like the fact that Cory started a sentence with: "The mature information worker is someone who can..."
There need to be more conversations about personal information management, especially when we see so many examples of strangely unevolved behavior around us -
It's increasingly frustrating to be in the midst of live, sychronous discussion, when somebody receives a (frequently asychronous) message on their device... and then to lose that person in a 'live' context while they attend to something that could probably be queued.
I agree on your statement on how technology is not to blame.
Technology is developed by people and use by people and the people make it
happen. I think that is one of the reasons why we have so many breakthroughs
since we all use the technology differently.
The ThinkerNet does not reflect the views of TechWeb. The ThinkerNet is an informal means of communication to members and visitors of the Internet Evolution site. Individual authors are chosen by Internet Evolution to blog. Neither Internet Evolution nor TechWeb assume responsibility for comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and ThinkerNet bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
Bunhill Cemetery is just down the road from my flat in London. It’s a handsome old boneyard, a former plague pit (“Bone hill” -- as in, there are so many bones under there that the ground is actually kind of humped up into a hill). There are plenty of luminaries buried there -- John “Pilgrim’s Progress” Bunyan, William Blake, Daniel Defoe, and assorted Cromwells. But my favorite tomb is that of Thomas Bayes, the 18th-century statistician for whom Bayesian filtering is named.
The Murdoch/News International scandal has all the elements of the digital age, from phone-hacking through embarrassing emails to agile digital reporting.
New York's Metropolitan Transit Authority is conducting a pilot test of digital kiosks to guide subway users to where they want to go more efficiently and at lower cost.
Google's Knowledge Graph concept of returning the "right answer" might change the Internet if it becomes a common practice, but it could also contaminate the answers with commericalism or hurt Google's own business. Can they navigate these choices?
New York's Metropolitan Transit Authority is conducting a pilot test of digital kiosks to guide subway users to where they want to go more efficiently and at lower cost.
The whole Amazon.reader debate is a double-stupid. It's stupid to think that there's any e-book buyer who doesn't know Amazon's URL, and it was stupider to let ICANN launch the whole free-form TLD initiative to start with.
While NFC's original goal was to enhance mobile commerce applications, it is finding its way into a number of other uses, which is creating both opportunity as well as challenges for IT departments.
Enterprises would like to move to cloud computing but are hesitant because they are concerned about providers’ ability to secure company data. Here are some tips that help to ensure that if breaches occur, the business is not left holding the bag.
Edmunds separates customers into segments based on the info it collects on its site and from partners, and uses that to push out custom content, said Brian Baron, director of business analytics for Edmunds.com, at Predictive Analytics Innovation Summit.
The automotive website uses propensity modeling to target ads and customer registration forms, said Brian Baron, director of business analytics for Edmunds.com, at Predictive Analytics Innovation Summit.
Expert Integrated Systems: Changing the Experience & Economics of IT In this e-book, we take an in-depth look at these expert integrated systems -- what they are, how they work, and how they have the potential to help CIOs achieve dramatic savings while restoring IT's role as business innovator. READ THIS eBOOK
your weekly update of news, analysis, and
opinion from Internet Evolution - FREE! REGISTER HERE
Wanted! Site Moderators Internet Evolution is looking for a handful of readers to help moderate the message boards on our site as well as engaging in high-IQ conversation with the industry mavens on our thinkerNet blogosphere. The job comes with various perks, bags of kudos, and GIANT bragging rights. Interested?
To save this item to your list of favorite Internet Evolution content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
M2M: Rise of the Machines? Not Yet David Weldon In the 1970 science fiction thriller Colossus: The Forbin Project, two giant supercomputers from the United States and Soviet Union secretly join forces to take control of the collective nuclear might of the two countries. In the film, the two machines discover each other's existence, communicate back-and-forth, share their collective data, and cut their human creators out of the process. It is the ultimate example of machine-to-machine communications, or M2M. CLICK FOR MORE
M2M: Rise of the Machines? Not Yet David Weldon In the 1970 science fiction thriller Colossus: The Forbin Project, two giant supercomputers from the United States and Soviet Union secretly join forces to take control of the collective nuclear might of the two countries. In the film, the two machines discover each other's existence, communicate back-and-forth, share their collective data, and cut their human creators out of the process. It is the ultimate example of machine-to-machine communications, or M2M. CLICK FOR MORE