For all of those focused on mastering the art of Twitter, thinking it an entryway into the hearts and minds of all the world's consumers -- think again: The majority of Twitter's traffic and content is created by just 10 percent of its users.
Those are the numbers gleaned from a study by the Harvard Business school. (Yeah, Harvard, we know. But, after all, it takes a preppy to catch a preppy...) The researcher, Bill Heil, a graduating MBA student, examined the activity of over 300,000 randomly selected Twitter users in May 2009 and found that over 90 percent of all Twitter activity is created by just 10 percent of the Twitter population. Per the study: "Among Twitter users, the median number of lifetime tweets per user is one. This translates into over half of Twitter users tweeting less than once every 74 days."
Typically something like: @CatLuvr Uh. What the hell is the point of this?
In other words, this research suggests that most people who test out Twitter get bored quickly and don't bother to keep up with it. This stat echoes the findings of another recent study by Nielsen, which showed that 60 percent of Twitter users drop off after the first month.
OK, so big deal. It's not unusual for a sampling of users to emerge as the most active on a social network (though the Harvard study claims that -- on typical social networks -- "the top 10 percent of users account for 30 percent of all production").
But, for Twitter, this definitely matters for two (2!) big (elephant-sized!) reasons.
For starters, consider the attention being paid to Twitter and to using the service to leverage one's business. The number of conferences, panels, reports, Webinars, awards ceremonies, and paid research dedicated to cracking the code of the Tweet is, at this point, beyond nauseating and -- if these stats are any indication -- rather pointless. Sure, on its face Twitter might seem like the prime platform to reach a boatload of consumers, but, as it turns out, it's more like a lifeboat. (And a sinking one, at that.)
Further, Twitter's executives -- as well as industry analysts and VCs -- have suggested that the company could eventually make money by charging business users for access to rich consumer data. But with only 10 percent of Twitter's users actually participating on the site, paying for such data is hardly appealing, and this revenue model won't work. Twitter might be able to claim hundreds of thousands of users and record-breaking traffic, but that's not the same thing as having a treasure trove of user data if 90 percent of the users aren't adding any value.
It's not surprising that the vast majority of people who test out Twitter grow bored and don't bother keeping an active account. But it is a huge problem for a company that plans to leverage its purportedly massive traffic and userbase to make money. Further, it's a testament to the fact that Twitter, like every other silly Web-service-turned-world-changer, is not all it's hyped up to be.
Hey nasimson. Your point is well taken. It points to the fact that a lot of Websites have inflated "active user" numbers. According to the study, Twitter's inactivity rate is higher than the other social networks, though I can't personally verify that right now. (Working on it, however.)
That said, though, the fact that Twitter is 90% inactive still seems problematic and it definitely suggests that the site isn't as popular as it's made out to be.
the first time I ever heard of twitter was when a friend told me how cool she thought it was and that I should sign up right away. So, against my better judgment, I created an account. You can count me as part of the people in the 80% that don't participate. I have never even logged in, basically because, I have never seen or felt a need to use it. And I have no urge to begin now.
I usually stay busy enough getting work done without writing a tweet to tell everybody else what I have done, or what I'm about to do next. I think I'll try to log in there and see if I can delete my account. there're enough twits out there already.
Nicole, this post alone does not draw the complete picture. Most ABC users dont use ABC. Fill in the ABC for any online application: Skype, Facebook, MSN Chat, ICQ etc. etc.
So stats for Twitter get a context only if you present similar stats for other Web 2.0 applications. Twitter being a category inventor has its larger share of onlookers, experimenters, bored & ditchers
This post is full of so many holes I'm not sure where to start??!!
First, 15% really, in a city who's motto is "If We Can Tax It, We Will..."?
Please, who's the source of that number -- surely not anyone who's living not only not in NYC, but the US as a whole...
Second, if the economic climate had anything to do with this, it would be to increase the output as those caught up in the trap would find they'd have plenty more time to "tweet" while going between job interviews -- but of course, the economic climate has "NOTHING" to do with it.
People are dropping Twitter because it's just another buzz-fad that's headed for the super-highway trash bin!!...
It's easy enough to explain this phenomenon: it's free. Easy to get, easy to ditch. What makes other free services better is that they don't get ditched all too easily.
I'm taking a group of Scouts on a cross country trip this summer. Using Twitter will allow one post to a site which will then distribute the info to people (parents) who subscribe. being able to do this with a text message from my phone is huge since I have free texting but have to pay for web access.
Twitter has it's uses, just not many for me.
Dave
I couldn't agree more. Twitter seems to have only a fraction of the usability that Facebook offers to keep in touch with your "peeps".
When I was first considering joining Twitter, I actually posted a status message on my FB page to ask my friends if any of them used it and when their thoughts were. The resounding response was that it was sometimes fun to "stalk" the celebrities but that it was redundant to FB. Therefore, I did not bother to join.
I think Twitter may have been a day late and a dollar short on this one! FB can easily become a way of life, whereas Twitter is more of something on a "To Do" list and let's face it, most of us have plenty of those already.
I notice that the tweeters who seem to succeed are consultants and media types who put substantial effort into creating a "brand" for themselves on Twitter. To do that takes time and effort. If you have a full-time job, it's tough to get into the loop.
That said, I find Twitter more engaging than Facebook because I get get less meaningless information (believe it or not); and it's easier to access and read (at least for me).
In the long run, though, as this trend wanes, my interest will no doubt wane along with it.
I also think that my desire to tweet strangely drops everytime someone new follows me. It's kind of like the adage that "I wouldn't be a member of a club that would have me as a member," but it's more like the fact I know my tweets would be lame and somehow, I'd feel better, tweeting lamely with no observers.
Technically, I know that makes no sense at all.
Then again, Twitter makes no sense to me at all, either. Everytime I think of a business-related Twitter possibility, I think of something that will accomplish the task better.
Mark, do you know what' s going on with social networking profiles? I mean, is it the same situation with non-used accounts as on twitter or blogs or people use them more ?
The ThinkerNet does not reflect the views of TechWeb. The ThinkerNet is an informal means of communication to members and visitors of the Internet Evolution site. Individual authors are chosen by Internet Evolution to blog. Neither Internet Evolution nor TechWeb assume responsibility for comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and ThinkerNet bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
We're live on IE Radio with Naomi Baron, author of Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World, and professor of linguistics and language at American University.
Hey, IE Radio fans! We hope you're ready for another exciting interview. Today we're welcoming Naomi Baron, author of Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World, and professor of linguistics and language at American University. Baron is joining us at 2:00 p.m. ET.
The Internet is making us stupid. No wait, the Internet is making us smart. Multi-tasking helps us consume more information... orrrr it reduces the amount of knowledge we can retain.
The Web has become the preferred spot for documenting personal flaws. With every online confession, Web users are crafting their detailed autobiographies and setting them free for the public's consuming pleasure.
Earlier this week, Facebook made a big fuss over the fact that it has allegedly registered its 500 millionth user. In an effort to celebrate, we here at Internet Evolution called for your Facebook Horror Stories. Hoo boy, was this going to be fun!
Getting to Work on Smart Work: How IT Is Transforming the Implementation of the 'Internet of Things' Organizations in all industry sectors are becoming more instrumented, interconnected, and intelligent -- and that's changing the way they approach virtually every facet of their operations. It's up to IT to help organizations adopt a "Three I's" approach that leverages the emerging Internet of Things and enables them to work smarter. READ THIS eBOOK
your weekly update of news, analysis, and
opinion from Internet Evolution - FREE! REGISTER HERE
Wanted! Site Moderators Internet Evolution is looking for a handful of readers to help moderate the message boards on our site – as well as engaging in high-IQ conversation with the industry mavens on our thinkerNet blogosphere. The job comes with various perks, bags of kudos, and GIANT bragging rights. Interested?
To save this item to your list of favorite Internet Evolution content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
We do love our social networking, but, according to computer scientist Jaron Lanier, we may be diminishing ourselves when we join the hive. “May be? Ha!” says Mr. Cramer.
As enterprises leap into the Web 2.0 world of blogging, commenting, and social networking, just 'being there' won't deliver ROI. You may want a 'Web Evangelist' to systematically harvest the feedback in order to polish your product or service.
More companies are trolling social networks to find and vet potential job candidates. Beware the pitfalls of blurring the line between personal and professional lives.
AOL took a bath when it sold off its social networking site, but as the "biggest and best producer of quality content in the world" was it also wrong to dismiss Bebo’s financing model for original content?
There's a public-policy war on copyright that nobody is winning, and inconsistencies in viewpoint and interpretation seem to be multiplying. We need to step back and think our policies over again, or we risk having a strategy that fails everyone.
Ultraviolet is an industry-wide attempt to standardize video content delivery across multiple platforms. Apart from the fact that it’s based in the cloud, relies on the DRM system, and isn’t backed by Apple… it sounds great!
The FCC's Sixth Broadband Report has a hidden secret. But here’s a hint: The regulatory body plans to regulate broadband as a telecommunications service.
Once defined by epic journeys, planning, and maps, the phrase "on the road" takes on new meaning in a digital age, where we can make all our decisions using our connected devices en route.
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Email This
TWEET THIS
