If you think that
Facebook or email password of yours is safe in the hands of your friends, families, significant others, hermit crabs, etc. -- a recent poll on Internet Evolution suggests you may be naive.
In response to the question, "Have you ever logged into someone's email or social networking account without his or her knowledge?" here's what our sneaky readers said:
Sure. By a slim margin, the majority of nearly 300 readers who weighed in vow to never have committed such an act. But that still leaves a whopping 42 percent who readily admit to it -- and this is coming from an educated tech-readership, not a band of merry thieves (or so we thought...).
Well, so what. Maybe you just needed to see who your significant other was poking on Facebook. Or maybe you were just plain curious and bored with your own digital life. Besides, it's not like anything on the Internet is private anyway.
It seems clear that it's ethically wrong to sign into someone's account without permission (I'm certain our Internet Ethicist would concur) -- whether that person haphazardly left the password lying around on a Post-It, or entrusted it to you for some ungodly reason. But our poll suggests that, when it comes to matters of the Internet, sometimes ethics go out the window in favor of acts of ease that appear harmless.
But, you tell us: Is logging into someone else's account without permission always ethically wrong, or does it depend on the circumstance?
Regardless of your answer, you may want to consider changing that password.
Say you give your password to someone one time because you're without Internet access and need someone to check for an email, or something. People do this all the time without thinking twice about it. It's implied you only expect this trusted person to use your account for this isolated purpose, but who is to say he/she isn't going to periodically log in? You know, just out of curiosity, and just because it's that easy. In that case, you aren't necessarily expecting them to use your password more than that one time. But apparently you should be.
I agree, if you give away your password then expect someone to use it. Especially, if you are the typre of person who uses the same password for everything.
Why would someone give away their password if they didn't want you to log in? As a web consultant I've had many instances where a client has asked me to log in and look for something they couldn't find. Many of us probably have. With that all said, that is with permission. So without permission I completely disagree with logging into someone elses account. The only thing you can possibly gain from logging into someone elses account is an expressway to heartache. Finding out that someone's poking someone when they shouldn't be, or reading their Nigerian spam and wondering why you didn't get a chance at a big bank account can only lead to disappointment. If you think you are finding out something valuable, remember, you can never talk to them about it because they will know that you've been in their email. Man, you want to talk about S.N.A.D., try bringing that up at the water cooler at work. It's nice to see that internet ethics is not totally dead. Thanks Nicole
Hello Nicole!Great Post, really enjoyed reading it.I think in most of situations it is ethically wrong, but you never know...I could imagine when the parents who suspect that their child is a drug addict try to logg into the accounts to find out something.Or the same situation with cyberbullying - the parents suspect something and they need information to help their kid.
There is another situation,when something wrong has happened with account owner.
The general consensus so far appears to be that no-way, no-how, not whatsoever is it ever ethically acceptable to access someone's email account without their knowledge or permission. Most individuals consider murder to be unethical, but do those same people feel the same when it comes to self-preservation, defending one's family and home? Suddenly, there is a grey line drawn. While some will still defend that killing another human is unethical, and others will say that it is unethical but necessary, is it really unethical when a majority of your peers are in agreement that killing a human for certain reasons is acceptable? Is it really true that no one can think on one single acceptable reason that it may be required or necessary to access an email account without the knowledge or permission of the account holder? Not even when such access may have a bearing on protecting or saving the lives of others? Or is this thrown into the category of acceptably unethical just don't let us know you are doing it? Do you really find that the question of what is ethical or not is that black and white?
"So, are you saying that spouses should or should not be logging into each other's accounts?"
I'd say that depends on the ground rules set first, then what you may find ;-) I'm sure this alone is a heavy topic with wide variations as well as being the root of many issues that depends heavily on the foundation of relationships. Some may have an 'open' door established with comfort, and others..well they may feel the need to hold on to some privacy. This may very well be a scenario where likes should stick with likes and avoid the 'opposites attract' match ups.
Harmony obviously negates this issue period to moot oblivion, I say!!
I worked with a security analyst and he had this phrase on his desk, framed for all to see:
Passwords are like underwear. Change them ofter, don't share them and don't leave them out for everyone to see.
This works...to a point, until you see that in the 90's music scene, underwear was an outside clothing option.
In the capacity of administrator of my family's email server and domain, there are times when I need access to a mailbox in order to troubleshoot. I have never logged onto an account just to read the mail. But, I know that there are unscrupulous people out there...in one place I worked, an admin set up a fake route on the company's internal network and intercepted all email that was sent to the director of the department and read it and even acted upon it...this is wrong. but to access a mail box to fix a problem, sure, as long as the email you're reading is the one you sent in order to facilitate the troubleshooting.
Re: "Ethics in password protection differ btw spouses and everything else.
Trust is a big factor between spouses and it has it's own layers of
complexity and clarity of violation in my opinion."
So, are you saying that spouses should or should not be logging into each other's accounts?
Also, regarding hindsatya's comment... signing out of an account is the easiest thing in the world, but so many people don't do it out of sheer laziness. My brother frequently uses my laptop and doesn't sign out of his Facebook account, so every time I go to Facebook after he uses my computer, his page is up there. I also have friends whose relationships have ended because their significant other's Facebook page was left open on their computer, allowing them to scroll around and find some unsavory messages and exchanges.
I still find the user id and password every now and then displayed within the url parameter on some sites. Very similar to leaving your userid and pw on a post it stuck to your monitor...or worse because it was not intended to be written on a post-it so it may have greater relation with your most coveted login/passwords.
Ethics in password protection differ btw spouses and everything else. Trust is a big factor between spouses and it has it's own layers of complexity and clarity of violation in my opinion.
Be careful about your privacy. Think Passwords as sensitive . It is not wise to pen it down anywhere.
But there are certain other issues other than the hacking part using all sorts of softwares and hardwares.
I have come across certain issues do check it:
When you are about to close a mail account just do not close it directly but first log out. Unknowingly , some do that. I myself has seen most of the time, when I log in to the machine and make my homepage as yahoo or gmail whatever , I directly came across with the mailbox of the last person logged in! Does it not sound amazing. But sometimes it doesn't happen.I don't know the reason. there are sessions while you login and the safer part is you have to give in your password after the session has expired then why it doesn't work the other time. so beware , first logout then close.
Secondly, if you opt out to remember your password the next time you logs in can also lead to problem. The other person needs only your id to login. generally we do it on our personal machines, but sometimes if mistake you do it on others then --obviously you will land up in trouble
The ThinkerNet does not reflect the views of TechWeb. The ThinkerNet is an informal means of communication to members and visitors of the Internet Evolution site. Individual authors are chosen by Internet Evolution to blog. Neither Internet Evolution nor TechWeb assume responsibility for comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and ThinkerNet bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
In another step toward becoming socially acceptable, Google today unveiled "Google Buzz" -- a method for social sharing from inside Gmail. Naturally, some ever-creative types are already dubbing this release as a "Twitter-killer" and a "Facebook-killer." Because, we just can't get enough of that kind of language.
Hey, IE Radio lovers: We're live right now with Jeff Jonas, chief scientist at IBM Corp. (NYSE: IBM). You won't want to miss this, so hurry up and head on over!
We hope you can tune in for an IE Radio interview today with a true industry innovator, Jeff Jonas, chief scientist at IBM. We're talking to Jonas today at 3:00 p.m. ET. Do. Not. Miss. It.
Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL)'s recent unveiling of its "magical" iPad may have fanboys counting the days until March, but if a recent poll on Internet Evolution is any indication, not everyone is buying into the hype.
We do a lot of grousing here on Internet Evolution, and usually for good reason, considering the amount of nonsense that keeps this industry afloat on its cloud of hot steamy air!!!! But... we can still happily acknowledge those titans who have succeeded in leading the way or paving new ground in their respective fields and, in turn, give credit when it is well deserved.
Smarter Collaboration: How to Thrive in a Challenging Business Environment Market conditions are changing faster than ever, and organizations need to improve their agility and adaptability in order to provide better service and improve processes. The ability to work with customers, business partners, and employees as effectively as possible - while at the same time holding down costs - is a key to success. READ THIS eBOOK
your weekly update of news, analysis, and
opinion from Internet Evolution - FREE! REGISTER HERE
Wanted! Site Moderators Internet Evolution is looking for a handful of readers to help moderate the message boards on our site – as well as engaging in high-IQ conversation with the industry mavens on our thinkerNet blogosphere. The job comes with various perks, bags of kudos, and GIANT bragging rights. Interested?
To save this item to your list of favorite Internet Evolution content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
Data mining of social networks means people might face unforeseen consequences as a result of their seemingly innocuous personal choices and associations.
What can users today do to protect their online privacy? The simplest and most obvious option is to not use the Internet – at all. However, once all digital information is consolidated over the Internet, trying to protect digital identity by simply unplugging from the Internet becomes impossible – a fact that has manifest implications for civil liberties, Saunders says.
By 2011 the number of Internet-connected sensors will exceed 1 trillion, making your chances of doing anything or going anywhere unnoticed pretty much zero. Saunders talks about how the 'sensortization' of the Internet is eliminating the traditional divide between online and offline populations.
The 20th Century Internet was characterized by the ability to interact with other people and information on the Internet largely without anyone knowing who you were. The Internet of this century, conversely, will be defined by identity. Saunders explains how Internet users are unwittingly contributing to the demise of the anonymous Internet.
More companies are trolling social networks to find and vet potential job candidates. Beware the pitfalls of blurring the line between personal and professional lives.
It is 20 years since the invention of the World Wide Web, and the Internet has changed beyond recognition since then. Steve Saunders peers into the future to predict what the Web will look like in another 20 years time – and he doesn’t like what he sees.
Some of the "cool" people are testing a new Web service: Blippy. It could be a great data source for corporations to glean info about customers’ credit card purchases. But it has all sorts of possible privacy and security problems. Buyer beware!
As enterprises leap into the Web 2.0 world of blogging, commenting, and social networking, just 'being there' won't deliver ROI. You may want a 'Web Evangelist' to systematically harvest the feedback in order to polish your product or service.
In the final episode of this series about the death of Internet anonymity, Saunders describes how the Internet of the future will start to attain a level of intelligence that requires no human intervention. Scary.
Research shows that the youth of today like Facebook – but not blogging or Twitter. Does that mean Facebook has won, or just that it's not yet out of favor? Will all the services we see today fade into Ovaltine-or-Wheaties status in just a few years?
What kinds of companies are doing the most innovation in the data center? Turns out it's midtier enterprises that are taking the "Just Right" approach.
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Email This
TWEET THIS
