The Associated Press has stirred up controversy this week by essentially spewing on open conversations and information sharing on the Internet.
The hullabaloo began yesterday when the AP sent a cease-and-desist letter to Rogers Cadenhead, owner of the Drudge Retort, for excerpting parts of its articles, calling it a copyright infringement (despite his proper use of links, attribution, kudos, etc.).
Today, it was pointed out that the AP is charging a fee for "quotation licenses." These licenses start at $12.50 and afford buyers the rights to quote five to 25 words of an article. Also, according to its Terms of Use, the AP forbids paying customers from criticizing the AP when quoting them -- and it bribes people with a reward of "up to one million dollars" to report pirates. Arrgh.
Now, copyright infringement and plagiarism are one thing, but quoting another article, with a proper link and attribution, that's what we non-archaic types call "the Internet" (heard of it?), the blogosphere, the new wave of journalism, and life. To rebut that with hissy fits and hissy fees will prove to be futile for the old AP.
On the phone today with Internet Evolution, Chris Tolles, CEO of Topix, said this effort to charge the blogosphere for snippets won't get the AP very far. Moreover, he said, the fact that the AP is even concerned about links and quotes points to a larger problem.
"The nature of the Internet is to in fact link to other things and engage with that content," he said. "If you lose all value by the very nature of people doing that, then you don't have a business on the Internet."
Topix, said Tolles, has a signed licensing agreement with the AP, as do Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) and other news organizations. He calls it fair for the AP to require this of bigger companies but thinks charging the blogosphere for snippets won't be the right long-term solution for the AP.
"The AP was built in age where sharing content made a lot of sense because everything was owned by the local monopoly... Now everybody's in the same business all the time," he said. "If you want to be on the Internet, everyone gets to link to you. Hey, your business model might have been outmoded by technology. I'm sorry, thank you for playing."
By aggravating the blogosphere, the AP is mainly damaging its online rep by removing itself from the very important conversations we're having on this here Web. The Internet is territory for both active and reactive conversations, and by only affording big, paying media companies access to its dialogue, the AP is on its way to becoming a tired source, at least according to the online masses.
Recently the New York Times has expressed their support towards the AP, in several articles, as reported by TechCrunch's Michael Arrington. There are some issues of conflict of interest (NYT is part-owner of AP).
Clearly the AP is standing its ground, but I doubt they can match it with actions.
Well, the AP obviously doesn't understand this new thing called the internet...They want to be a presence on the internet, but they don't want to be referenced...wait, they don't mind being referenced, but they want to be paid for being quoted, even when referenced and linked properly. Maybe they should protect themselves by staying off of the information super highway. Seems like the safest thing to me. But wait - maybe we can all get richer by deciding to quote some snippets, having our friends report us, and splitting the millions and millions of reward dollars. Heehee a new business model! Bring it on AP!
When I'm famous, I will charge AP a fee if they quote me. If they do not pay, yet still print my quoted words, then I'll sue them. You can quote me on that.
I'm glad that such controversy erupted at a time like this. It just goes to show that even organizations like the AP are failing or ignoring the new realities. What has become of the principle of fair Use? Or do the AP wants to re-define 'Fair Use' base on it s terms? Ap should realized that blogs are generating huge traffic for them and it's sad that they have allowed greed to clog their reasoning and choose to pitch tent against the Internet. What is 'cut and paste' which this AP official is referring to:
"AP wants to fill in some facts and perspective on its recent actions with the Drudge Retort, and also reassure those in the blogosphere about AP’s view of these situations. Yes, indeed, we are trying to protect our intellectual property online, as most news and content creators are around the world. But our interests in that regard extend only to instances that go beyond brief references and direct links to our coverage.
The Associated Press encourages the engagement of bloggers -- large and small -- in the news conversation of the day. Some of the largest blogs are licensed to display AP stories in full on a regular basis. We genuinely value and encourage referring links to our coverage, and even offer RSS feeds from www.ap.org, as do many of our licensed customers".
We get concerned, however, when we feel the use is more reproduction than reference, or when others are encouraged to cut and paste. That’s not good for original content creators; nor is it consistent with the link-based culture of the Internet that bloggers have cultivated so well.
In this particular case, we have had direct and helpful communication with the site in question, focusing only on these issues.
I support the stance taken by Micheal Carrington of Techcrunch that Bloggers should not accept these new AP terms and to boycott all their stories until they come to their senses:
The ThinkerNet does not reflect the views of TechWeb. The ThinkerNet is an informal means of communication to members and visitors of the Internet Evolution site. Individual authors are chosen by Internet Evolution to blog. Neither Internet Evolution nor TechWeb assume responsibility for comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and ThinkerNet bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
Ahh, the holiday season is upon us: People have begun bargain hunting, department stores are donning premature decorations, turkeys are being shot to death, and email inboxes everywhere are being graced with season-appropriate promotional materials so absurd, one might think they were actually written by the clinically insane.
Considering President Obama went and took the Nobel Peace Prize this year (attention hog, much?), Internet Evolution had to settle for a nomination for the second best prize in the world: a MIN Editorial & Design award. And we're happy to say that we won. Big time.
NEW YORK -- Web 2.0 Expo -- Here at the Javits Center in New York City, several industry innovators have come out to take the stage at the Web 2.0 Expo. But some are having a hard time keeping the audience's attention. The culprit? What else? Twitter.
The debate over whether Google is fairly aggregating newspaper content online has been going on for a while, with Rupert Murdoch and News Corp. leading the discourse. Typically it's followed a consistent pattern: Murdoch complains about Google stealing its content to no real benefit to his company, someone suggests hiding the content from Google, and things get quiet on the News Corp. side of the room.
While Google introduces its new Chrome OS (which I'm hearing will be widely available in one year? Did I mishear that?), IBM announced 10 new products today to help companies using IBM System z mainframe technology.
Smarter Collaboration: How to Thrive in a Challenging Business Environment Market conditions are changing faster than ever, and organizations need to improve their agility and adaptability in order to provide better service and improve processes. The ability to work with customers, business partners, and employees as effectively as possible - while at the same time holding down costs - is a key to success. READ THIS eBOOK
your weekly update of news, analysis, and
opinion from Internet Evolution - FREE! REGISTER HERE
Wanted! Site Moderators Internet Evolution is looking for a handful of readers to help moderate the message boards on our site – as well as engaging in high-IQ conversation with the industry mavens on our thinkerNet blogosphere. The job comes with various perks, bags of kudos, and GIANT bragging rights. Interested?
To save this item to your list of favorite Internet Evolution content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
As enterprises leap into the Web 2.0 world of blogging, commenting, and social networking, just 'being there' won't deliver ROI. You may want a 'Web Evangelist' to systematically harvest the feedback in order to polish your product or service.
More companies are trolling social networks to find and vet potential job candidates. Beware the pitfalls of blurring the line between personal and professional lives.
The problem with telepresence is that it's not universally accepted, because video calling isn't. While we can all do video calling, we also apparently worry too much about how we look. If we want HD telepresence in our future, we have to dress down, mess up our hair, and dive into our online life.
When Reiter gets incensed over incompetent Verizon FiOS order-taking and support, he broadcasts it via Twitter. Did it do any good? How should your company offer Twitter support? Watch this for all the answers.
The programmable Web, open APIs, and cloud-based services will fundamentally change orthodox telcos, and they need to decide what they are really good for in this new world: It's not necessarily what you might think, according to one of the world's biggest telcos.
Industry initiatives and government stimulus funds are giving enterprise software vendors a great opportunity to help build out and manage smart grid technologies.
The problem with telepresence is that it's not universally accepted, because video calling isn't. While we can all do video calling, we also apparently worry too much about how we look. If we want HD telepresence in our future, we have to dress down, mess up our hair, and dive into our online life.
The US loses about $20 billion a year on pirated software, movies, and music. But public policy can help stem the tide of digital theft. For example, France has recently passed a 'three strikes and you’re out' law, whereby if after two warning letters an individual continues to download pirated software then his Internet access will be cut off. US policy makers should consider adopting similar policies.
Financial management planning does not need to include Voodoo economics, but it does help to tap into the knowledge base of your team through some sort of real-time system. We explore your options.
When Reiter gets incensed over incompetent Verizon FiOS order-taking and support, he broadcasts it via Twitter. Did it do any good? How should your company offer Twitter support? Watch this for all the answers.
The successor to the BlackBerry Bold 9000 – the Bold 9700 – will be available soon in the US. Is it worth upgrading? Reiter's got one, and offers advice.
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Email This
TWEET THIS
