MySpace announced its "Data Availability" initiative this morning -- a service the company says is the first stepping stone toward its larger data portability plan.
The call was headed by Chris
DeWolfe, CEO and co-founder; Amit Kapur, COO; and Jim Benedetto,
SVP of technology, who described their excitement over MySpace's role in creating a more dynamic, social Internet.
With the Data Availability initiative, MySpace users will be able to share their profile content throughout the Internet. What this means is, eventually, rather than re-creating profiles across the Web, users will be able to port their profile data onto each new Website and social service they use. "Your personal
online social profile will become your Internet address," said DeWolfe.
The initiative is being built around open standards and is currently deploying OAuth, an open protocol that allows secure API authentication. "We feel open standards are key to a Web without islands," said Benedetto. "Today MySpace is no longer an independent island of data on the Web."
The execs assured us that users will be able to manage how data
is made
available through a centralized location on the site. Data that users can make available include
basic personal information, photos, videos, and their Friends lists.
"Now users can update their profiles on MySpace and dynamically share
that information on other sites they care about," said Kapur. Currently, those
sites include Yahoo Inc. (Nasdaq: YHOO), Twitter, Photobucket, and eBay Inc. (Nasdaq: EBAY), but the execs said
they'll be adding more to their roster in the future.
While the execs hailed this as the initiative that's going to change the structure of the Internet, it, of course, triggers some concerns over private data. As yet, there's no reason to throw our hands in the air screaming about privacy invasions, as this -- unlike Facebook's Beacon the First -- is an opt-in program that allows users to control whether or not to start or stop sharing their data.
However, when prodded about whether the participating sites will be able to run advertisements based on user data, DeWolfe side-stepped the question, instead saying, "The thing MySpace gets out of this is we're able to promote a more open and social Internet... As the largest social
network, we believe the more open and social the Internet becomes the better it is
for MySpace." MySpace, or MySpace's revenues? Time will determine that when the service rolls out in the coming weeks.
This rollout will also determine if we as users are as jazzed about data portability as the Web Gods are telling us we are. Some of us may simply prefer to manage our individual identities across the Web on our own -- tedious as it may be.
If MySpace is the king of the social networks, aren't they acknowledging that they are not truly the big dog on the block or the only game in town with this data portability factor?
After all, how many social networks does one truly need to participate in to be considered a web savvy butterfly? How much time does it truly save to leverage the info from one site to another, and doesn't that presuppose that other social network sites have the same mindset or end goal in mind?
Doesn't this sort of reveal that the social network site is truly in it for them, and not just so that you can stay connected with your network of friends?
The ulterior motive must be seen here. This is definitely about revenue and not an effort to save me time by me leveraging the meager amount of information that my personal data represents versus the weight of the internet!
Does this actually create a problem for social networking sites in that they will have to have a matching infrastructure in order to participate? Or is MySpace offering to be that matchmaker themself?
In any case, a very interesting development in the social world. Thanks for bringing it to light. Meanwhile I will tediously manage my personal data. I think that is a far better way for the moment. Thanks for sharing your meeting with us.
I think only time will tell how well this really works. Supposedly, the user will be able to determine exactly what data is shared and with whom. MySpace says it will give the user complete control over which data is shared where and it will enable the user to revoke sharing privileges if he/she decides not to share anymore.
However, in truth, the social networking sites shouldn't want data portability. They shouldn't want to be able to let go of the data they're storing for users. So obviously they're getting something out of this besides the warm and fuzzy feeling associated with living in an open Internet. Based on the conference call, I suspect this will allow MySpace to boost its ad revenues.
The benefit for the user is supposed to be that the entire Web knows you without your having to enter information. Depending on the user, this could turn out to be a really good or a really bad thing. I'm still skeptical. I think all of your questions are valid and, once we really start with data portability, we're going to find our data popping up in unintentional areas. It would be very annoying to allow for data portability only to have to go from site to site to set specific privacy settings. We may not be entirely ready for this shift.
The ThinkerNet does not reflect the views of TechWeb. The ThinkerNet is an informal means of communication to members and visitors of the Internet Evolution site. Individual authors are chosen by Internet Evolution to blog. Neither Internet Evolution nor TechWeb assume responsibility for comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and ThinkerNet bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
We're live on IE Radio with Naomi Baron, author of Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World, and professor of linguistics and language at American University.
Hey, IE Radio fans! We hope you're ready for another exciting interview. Today we're welcoming Naomi Baron, author of Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World, and professor of linguistics and language at American University. Baron is joining us at 2:00 p.m. ET.
The Internet is making us stupid. No wait, the Internet is making us smart. Multi-tasking helps us consume more information... orrrr it reduces the amount of knowledge we can retain.
The Web has become the preferred spot for documenting personal flaws. With every online confession, Web users are crafting their detailed autobiographies and setting them free for the public's consuming pleasure.
Earlier this week, Facebook made a big fuss over the fact that it has allegedly registered its 500 millionth user. In an effort to celebrate, we here at Internet Evolution called for your Facebook Horror Stories. Hoo boy, was this going to be fun!
Getting to Work on Smart Work: How IT Is Transforming the Implementation of the 'Internet of Things' Organizations in all industry sectors are becoming more instrumented, interconnected, and intelligent -- and that's changing the way they approach virtually every facet of their operations. It's up to IT to help organizations adopt a "Three I's" approach that leverages the emerging Internet of Things and enables them to work smarter. READ THIS eBOOK
your weekly update of news, analysis, and
opinion from Internet Evolution - FREE! REGISTER HERE
Wanted! Site Moderators Internet Evolution is looking for a handful of readers to help moderate the message boards on our site – as well as engaging in high-IQ conversation with the industry mavens on our thinkerNet blogosphere. The job comes with various perks, bags of kudos, and GIANT bragging rights. Interested?
To save this item to your list of favorite Internet Evolution content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
What can users today do to protect their online privacy? The simplest and most obvious option is to not use the Internet – at all. However, once all digital information is consolidated over the Internet, trying to protect digital identity by simply unplugging from the Internet becomes impossible – a fact that has manifest implications for civil liberties, Saunders says.
By 2011 the number of Internet-connected sensors will exceed 1 trillion, making your chances of doing anything or going anywhere unnoticed pretty much zero. Saunders talks about how the 'sensortization' of the Internet is eliminating the traditional divide between online and offline populations.
The 20th Century Internet was characterized by the ability to interact with other people and information on the Internet largely without anyone knowing who you were. The Internet of this century, conversely, will be defined by identity. Saunders explains how Internet users are unwittingly contributing to the demise of the anonymous Internet.
Steve Saunders talks about the risks inherent in uncontrolled, widespread profiling of Internet users, and how one day this practice could form the basis of a new industry, the Outernet, which in economic terms will have outgrown the commercial value of the Internet itself.
Search companies and social networks are collecting incredibly detailed information about their users, says Steve Saunders, who predicts that these 'profiles' could one day become commodities to be bought and sold by companies on 'profile markets' or 'identity exchanges’ – the digital DNA equivalents of the financial and commodities exchanges on which stocks, oil, and gold are traded.
One of the most important Internet issues of all time is being ignored by the media. In this three-part video series Steve Saunders explains how search companies are turning the tables on their users by creating user profiles for financial gain, and how soon this trend will explode into full scale profiling.
More companies are trolling social networks to find and vet potential job candidates. Beware the pitfalls of blurring the line between personal and professional lives.
It is 20 years since the invention of the World Wide Web, and the Internet has changed beyond recognition since then. Steve Saunders peers into the future to predict what the Web will look like in another 20 years time – and he doesn’t like what he sees.
AOL took a bath when it sold off its social networking site, but as the "biggest and best producer of quality content in the world" was it also wrong to dismiss Bebo’s financing model for original content?
There's a public-policy war on copyright that nobody is winning, and inconsistencies in viewpoint and interpretation seem to be multiplying. We need to step back and think our policies over again, or we risk having a strategy that fails everyone.
Ultraviolet is an industry-wide attempt to standardize video content delivery across multiple platforms. Apart from the fact that it’s based in the cloud, relies on the DRM system, and isn’t backed by Apple… it sounds great!
The FCC's Sixth Broadband Report has a hidden secret. But here’s a hint: The regulatory body plans to regulate broadband as a telecommunications service.
Once defined by epic journeys, planning, and maps, the phrase "on the road" takes on new meaning in a digital age, where we can make all our decisions using our connected devices en route.
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Email This
TWEET THIS
