MySpace announced its "Data Availability" initiative this morning -- a service the company says is the first stepping stone toward its larger data portability plan.
The call was headed by Chris
DeWolfe, CEO and co-founder; Amit Kapur, COO; and Jim Benedetto,
SVP of technology, who described their excitement over MySpace's role in creating a more dynamic, social Internet.
With the Data Availability initiative, MySpace users will be able to share their profile content throughout the Internet. What this means is, eventually, rather than re-creating profiles across the Web, users will be able to port their profile data onto each new Website and social service they use. "Your personal
online social profile will become your Internet address," said DeWolfe.
The initiative is being built around open standards and is currently deploying OAuth, an open protocol that allows secure API authentication. "We feel open standards are key to a Web without islands," said Benedetto. "Today MySpace is no longer an independent island of data on the Web."
The execs assured us that users will be able to manage how data
is made
available through a centralized location on the site. Data that users can make available include
basic personal information, photos, videos, and their Friends lists.
"Now users can update their profiles on MySpace and dynamically share
that information on other sites they care about," said Kapur. Currently, those
sites include Yahoo Inc. (Nasdaq: YHOO), Twitter, Photobucket, and eBay Inc. (Nasdaq: EBAY), but the execs said
they'll be adding more to their roster in the future.
While the execs hailed this as the initiative that's going to change the structure of the Internet, it, of course, triggers some concerns over private data. As yet, there's no reason to throw our hands in the air screaming about privacy invasions, as this -- unlike Facebook's Beacon the First -- is an opt-in program that allows users to control whether or not to start or stop sharing their data.
However, when prodded about whether the participating sites will be able to run advertisements based on user data, DeWolfe side-stepped the question, instead saying, "The thing MySpace gets out of this is we're able to promote a more open and social Internet... As the largest social
network, we believe the more open and social the Internet becomes the better it is
for MySpace." MySpace, or MySpace's revenues? Time will determine that when the service rolls out in the coming weeks.
This rollout will also determine if we as users are as jazzed about data portability as the Web Gods are telling us we are. Some of us may simply prefer to manage our individual identities across the Web on our own -- tedious as it may be.
If MySpace is the king of the social networks, aren't they acknowledging that they are not truly the big dog on the block or the only game in town with this data portability factor?
After all, how many social networks does one truly need to participate in to be considered a web savvy butterfly? How much time does it truly save to leverage the info from one site to another, and doesn't that presuppose that other social network sites have the same mindset or end goal in mind?
Doesn't this sort of reveal that the social network site is truly in it for them, and not just so that you can stay connected with your network of friends?
The ulterior motive must be seen here. This is definitely about revenue and not an effort to save me time by me leveraging the meager amount of information that my personal data represents versus the weight of the internet!
Does this actually create a problem for social networking sites in that they will have to have a matching infrastructure in order to participate? Or is MySpace offering to be that matchmaker themself?
In any case, a very interesting development in the social world. Thanks for bringing it to light. Meanwhile I will tediously manage my personal data. I think that is a far better way for the moment. Thanks for sharing your meeting with us.
I think only time will tell how well this really works. Supposedly, the user will be able to determine exactly what data is shared and with whom. MySpace says it will give the user complete control over which data is shared where and it will enable the user to revoke sharing privileges if he/she decides not to share anymore.
However, in truth, the social networking sites shouldn't want data portability. They shouldn't want to be able to let go of the data they're storing for users. So obviously they're getting something out of this besides the warm and fuzzy feeling associated with living in an open Internet. Based on the conference call, I suspect this will allow MySpace to boost its ad revenues.
The benefit for the user is supposed to be that the entire Web knows you without your having to enter information. Depending on the user, this could turn out to be a really good or a really bad thing. I'm still skeptical. I think all of your questions are valid and, once we really start with data portability, we're going to find our data popping up in unintentional areas. It would be very annoying to allow for data portability only to have to go from site to site to set specific privacy settings. We may not be entirely ready for this shift.
The ThinkerNet does not reflect the views of TechWeb. The ThinkerNet is an informal means of communication to members and visitors of the Internet Evolution site. Individual authors are chosen by Internet Evolution to blog. Neither Internet Evolution nor TechWeb assume responsibility for comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and ThinkerNet bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
Ahh, the holiday season is upon us: People have begun bargain hunting, department stores are donning premature decorations, turkeys are being shot to death, and email inboxes everywhere are being graced with season-appropriate promotional materials so absurd, one might think they were actually written by the clinically insane.
Considering President Obama went and took the Nobel Peace Prize this year (attention hog, much?), Internet Evolution had to settle for a nomination for the second best prize in the world: a MIN Editorial & Design award. And we're happy to say that we won. Big time.
NEW YORK -- Web 2.0 Expo -- Here at the Javits Center in New York City, several industry innovators have come out to take the stage at the Web 2.0 Expo. But some are having a hard time keeping the audience's attention. The culprit? What else? Twitter.
The debate over whether Google is fairly aggregating newspaper content online has been going on for a while, with Rupert Murdoch and News Corp. leading the discourse. Typically it's followed a consistent pattern: Murdoch complains about Google stealing its content to no real benefit to his company, someone suggests hiding the content from Google, and things get quiet on the News Corp. side of the room.
While Google introduces its new Chrome OS (which I'm hearing will be widely available in one year? Did I mishear that?), IBM announced 10 new products today to help companies using IBM System z mainframe technology.
Smarter Collaboration: How to Thrive in a Challenging Business Environment Market conditions are changing faster than ever, and organizations need to improve their agility and adaptability in order to provide better service and improve processes. The ability to work with customers, business partners, and employees as effectively as possible - while at the same time holding down costs - is a key to success. READ THIS eBOOK
your weekly update of news, analysis, and
opinion from Internet Evolution - FREE! REGISTER HERE
Wanted! Site Moderators Internet Evolution is looking for a handful of readers to help moderate the message boards on our site as well as engaging in high-IQ conversation with the industry mavens on our thinkerNet blogosphere. The job comes with various perks, bags of kudos, and GIANT bragging rights. Interested?
To save this item to your list of favorite Internet Evolution content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
What can users today do to protect their online privacy? The simplest and most obvious option is to not use the Internet – at all. However, once all digital information is consolidated over the Internet, trying to protect digital identity by simply unplugging from the Internet becomes impossible – a fact that has manifest implications for civil liberties, Saunders says.
By 2011 the number of Internet-connected sensors will exceed 1 trillion, making your chances of doing anything or going anywhere unnoticed pretty much zero. Saunders talks about how the 'sensortization' of the Internet is eliminating the traditional divide between online and offline populations.
The 20th Century Internet was characterized by the ability to interact with other people and information on the Internet largely without anyone knowing who you were. The Internet of this century, conversely, will be defined by identity. Saunders explains how Internet users are unwittingly contributing to the demise of the anonymous Internet.
Steve Saunders talks about the risks inherent in uncontrolled, widespread profiling of Internet users, and how one day this practice could form the basis of a new industry, the Outernet, which in economic terms will have outgrown the commercial value of the Internet itself.
Search companies and social networks are collecting incredibly detailed information about their users, says Steve Saunders, who predicts that these 'profiles' could one day become commodities to be bought and sold by companies on 'profile markets' or 'identity exchanges’ – the digital DNA equivalents of the financial and commodities exchanges on which stocks, oil, and gold are traded.
One of the most important Internet issues of all time is being ignored by the media. In this three-part video series Steve Saunders explains how search companies are turning the tables on their users by creating user profiles for financial gain, and how soon this trend will explode into full scale profiling.
More companies are trolling social networks to find and vet potential job candidates. Beware the pitfalls of blurring the line between personal and professional lives.
It is 20 years since the invention of the World Wide Web, and the Internet has changed beyond recognition since then. Steve Saunders peers into the future to predict what the Web will look like in another 20 years time – and he doesn’t like what he sees.
When Reiter gets incensed over incompetent Verizon FiOS order-taking and support, he broadcasts it via Twitter. Did it do any good? How should your company offer Twitter support? Watch this for all the answers.
Industry initiatives and government stimulus funds are giving enterprise software vendors a great opportunity to help build out and manage smart grid technologies.
The problem with telepresence is that it's not universally accepted, because video calling isn't. While we can all do video calling, we also apparently worry too much about how we look. If we want HD telepresence in our future, we have to dress down, mess up our hair, and dive into our online life.
The US loses about $20 billion a year on pirated software, movies, and music. But public policy can help stem the tide of digital theft. For example, France has recently passed a 'three strikes and you’re out' law, whereby if after two warning letters an individual continues to download pirated software then his Internet access will be cut off. US policy makers should consider adopting similar policies.
Financial management planning does not need to include Voodoo economics, but it does help to tap into the knowledge base of your team through some sort of real-time system. We explore your options.
When Reiter gets incensed over incompetent Verizon FiOS order-taking and support, he broadcasts it via Twitter. Did it do any good? How should your company offer Twitter support? Watch this for all the answers.
The successor to the BlackBerry Bold 9000 – the Bold 9700 – will be available soon in the US. Is it worth upgrading? Reiter's got one, and offers advice.