Let's say you're dead. How are you going to update your MySpace page?
One of the more emotionally disturbing questions that may arise when taking on an online persona is, what happens to that persona when your real life (RL!) comes to an end?
In addition to the countless Facebook and MySpace pages left behind by those who died before consciously disabling their accounts, there are now social networking sites dedicated to creating pages for the dead. On sites like Respectance and Memory-of.com, loved ones of the deceased create pages, comprising photos, videos, messages, etc., where they and the online world can pay tribute to those who've passed. And on sites like Facebook and MySpace, user profiles are taken over by living users, who riddle the walls with messages expressing hurt, love, hope, and regret.
While we can write this off as simply a way for people to remember their friends and family by allegedly keeping them alive online -- it is more dimensional than that -- as we have now normalized this process of social grieving.
A virtual cemetery, which is essentially what these sites are, is much different than an actual cemetery. Tears are represented through emoticons, flowers and candles are digital, and while much of the memorializing is likely done in privacy, what you do in a virtual cemetery is much more public than what you'd do in an actual cemetery.
In the spirit of taking our lives public, from the privacy of our own homes, we have internalized this obsession with exposition. Every daily endeavor is expressed in an AIM away message. Every feeling is conveyed via a Facebook status update. Every instance of Webside wonderment is posted on Twitter. So, it's no surprise that, in needing to make ourselves as publicly exposed as possible, we have decided to set up ways to socially grieve online.
A YouTube Inc. search of "in memory of" produces 78,300 videos of slideshows set to music and of grieving individuals expressing their feelings for a Webcam. And in the midst of getting sucked in, watching people expose their pain for a mass audience of strangers, you have to stop and think, to what avail?
It all fits into this new idea that, if it doesn't happen online, it doesn't happen at all.
Seems to me, though, fairly important that we remain mindful that all monuments we create -- all temporary to some greater or lesser extent -- remain here after death. There are some who would believe that such provides a more certain after life than that which is based in faith...
It is rare that we prepare for our deaths with thorough resolve. If we carry around a legacy of wealth the, yeah, we make those arrangements. But it hardly seems necessary to ensure that all information about us reads complete through the final chapter. For us to attend to these details only ensures that we will miss life itself. As a simple practical matter, few of us anticipate our death. And those who can, have other priorities I am sure...
And, yeah, there will always be those who build monuments to the memory of the dead. And you are right. The reasons for this span the full spectrum of human emotion and need. There is no rational reason for it, though. And one might argue that it is a selfish waste of our energy to grieve when all continuing life around us could benefit if we just let go of what is gone...
Whether our grief comes from sorrow or from joy, it is important to understand, I think, that we grieve not for the dead but, rather, for ourselves...
Hey, Nicole! I, personally,found it strange and unacceptable.On one hand.On the other hand.A lot of communication goes through social networks.People find new friends on the Internet, whom they might not have a chance to meet in real life. so when you e-buddy dies there should be some way to memorise s/he. So the networks you are writing about might be an appropriate way to express the grief.
I guess it's similar to making a video to play after you die, or some sort of real-life version of P.S., I Love You.
One thing, though, that this brings to mind, sadly, is another value these sites have. We've had a couple situations in K.C. recently where teenagers were missing and the lack of any updates to the MySpace page or Facebook has proven to be a leading indicator of foul play. Often, when a teenager goes missing, police default to the potential that the person is a runaway, yet even as a runaway, these pages often are updated. It's unlikely the teens' deaths could have been prevented, but certainly in one case, faster admission that the MySpace inactivity was evidence that the disappearance wasn't voluntary might have at least resulted in an arrest instead of an unsolved crime.
I'm sure there is a nice success story where a social networking side helped save a life and it would be uplifting to hear one of those.
Thank you Nicole for this post. It's quite amazing. I mean, not so far the fact that this exist, but, as you explained it, the fact that pain is so overexposed. I really have to think on the matter. In some days, we will have sites to post messages to coming babies by example... (sorry for my aproximate english, I'm french!)
What if the deceased person has prepared a series of message (audio, for example) to be uploaded (or even to call you) in the future after s/he is gone? "Communication", in this case, does not necessitate physical presence. I think it's not related to our need to be exposed, to feel exist by the other's recognition.
There have always been rituals associated with death which we perform for the sake of upholding ritual. You put flowers at a grave because it's tradition and a way of showing respect, not because you think the person is there and able to enjoy them. Similarly, now we've incorporated this ritual of writing messages on the deceased MySpace/Facebook pages. Not because (or at least, I hope not...) we think they're sitting there checking their MySpace from some Internet cafe in the sky. With evolution comes the evolution of and/or expansion on rituals. That is nothing new. What's interesting in this instance, however, is this conscious effort to make public displays of grief. This is a result of our newfound, partly subconscious need to be publicly exposed online in order to feel like we exist.
Hi,
When a person dies, our memories of him/her survives. But we knew for
sure that it's just memories. Our ritual marks this separation (of
presence and absence) so that we can cope with the loss, mend our
broken heart and revisit our memory of the beloved one. Problem comes
when our ritual does exactly the opposite, to blur the line, confuse us
what to remember and what to forget. This, I think, is what "digital
ritual" of remembering is about.
Actually, I sort of wish I had done some homework and started a concept like this years back. I do not remember when it was but a few years ago i saw something where you can send a message into the future... It was basically an email "holding cell" where you could send an email to yourself at a later point in time. The concept occurred to me that if emai addresses were as permanent as street addresses I could send holiday cards to my wife for decades after I passed on.
I then thought that a virtual cemetary would be a great way for our mobile society to demonstrate, with their family and friends, respect and reverence for those who have gone before as many families now live a long way apart from their roots.
I do not think this is so much an online concept, but a way of providing modern "comfort food" in terms of paying respects when a 3,000 mile journey is simply too far to place a flag on a grave for Veterans Day, or other date when people flock to cemetaries to pay respects.
Undoubtedly there will be multiple implementations of such a concept and sooner or later one of them will become mainstream as people adopt online as "normal". It may take a generation of two to make this a "real" thing but I have little doubt it will happen, probably after I am long gone.
I think I'm going to leave the login information for all my accounts so that someone can post "This Dude is dead" or simply close them out.
My wife's cousin died around seven months ago at the young age of 31. It's rather eerie in that he seems to live on through his myspace page where friends and family trade whimsical stories about the guy. Coincidentally, I think it's actually taking the family a much longer time to get over his death.
Anyway, it's Friday and life is short. I'm going to go home, kiss the wife, read my kid a bedtime story and then watch my tivo'ed presidential debates while drinking a beer (maybe two).
The ThinkerNet does not reflect the views of TechWeb. The ThinkerNet is an informal means of communication to members and visitors of the Internet Evolution site. Individual authors are chosen by Internet Evolution to blog. Neither Internet Evolution nor TechWeb assume responsibility for comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and ThinkerNet bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
We're live on IE Radio with Naomi Baron, author of Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World, and professor of linguistics and language at American University.
Hey, IE Radio fans! We hope you're ready for another exciting interview. Today we're welcoming Naomi Baron, author of Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World, and professor of linguistics and language at American University. Baron is joining us at 2:00 p.m. ET.
The Internet is making us stupid. No wait, the Internet is making us smart. Multi-tasking helps us consume more information... orrrr it reduces the amount of knowledge we can retain.
The Web has become the preferred spot for documenting personal flaws. With every online confession, Web users are crafting their detailed autobiographies and setting them free for the public's consuming pleasure.
Earlier this week, Facebook made a big fuss over the fact that it has allegedly registered its 500 millionth user. In an effort to celebrate, we here at Internet Evolution called for your Facebook Horror Stories. Hoo boy, was this going to be fun!
Getting to Work on Smart Work: How IT Is Transforming the Implementation of the 'Internet of Things' Organizations in all industry sectors are becoming more instrumented, interconnected, and intelligent -- and that's changing the way they approach virtually every facet of their operations. It's up to IT to help organizations adopt a "Three I's" approach that leverages the emerging Internet of Things and enables them to work smarter. READ THIS eBOOK
your weekly update of news, analysis, and
opinion from Internet Evolution - FREE! REGISTER HERE
Wanted! Site Moderators Internet Evolution is looking for a handful of readers to help moderate the message boards on our site as well as engaging in high-IQ conversation with the industry mavens on our thinkerNet blogosphere. The job comes with various perks, bags of kudos, and GIANT bragging rights. Interested?
To save this item to your list of favorite Internet Evolution content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
Saunders is wrong on Hulu, Fritz thinks. By most measures it's been
a success, and there's no reason this model won't become even bigger in the next three years. Oh, and he hates Steve's hat.
As enterprises leap into the Web 2.0 world of blogging, commenting, and social networking, just 'being there' won't deliver ROI. You may want a 'Web Evangelist' to systematically harvest the feedback in order to polish your product or service.
We do love our social networking, but, according to computer scientist Jaron Lanier, we may be diminishing ourselves when we join the hive. “May be? Ha!” says Mr. Cramer.
There's a public-policy war on copyright that nobody is winning, and inconsistencies in viewpoint and interpretation seem to be multiplying. We need to step back and think our policies over again, or we risk having a strategy that fails everyone.
Ultraviolet is an industry-wide attempt to standardize video content delivery across multiple platforms. Apart from the fact that it’s based in the cloud, relies on the DRM system, and isn’t backed by Apple… it sounds great!
The FCC's Sixth Broadband Report has a hidden secret. But here’s a hint: The regulatory body plans to regulate broadband as a telecommunications service.
Once defined by epic journeys, planning, and maps, the phrase "on the road" takes on new meaning in a digital age, where we can make all our decisions using our connected devices en route.