Long, looonnngggg ago, in May 2007, well before you were born,
Facebook opened up its platform to third-party application developers and instantly achieved a reputation as the omnipotent God of all things social networking.
The end.
Well, not exactly the end. Because with the launch of OpenSocial, "the end" just became "game on."
OpenSocial, a collaboration of 12 companies spearheaded by the biggest spearhead of them all, Google (Nasdaq: GOOG), is a new open Web application programming interface (API) that can be supported by both social networks and applications. Simply put, this is the same type of system that drove Facebook to stardom, except OpenSocial applications can run on any social network; whereas Facebook applications are written in Facebook Markup Language (FBML) and Facebook Query Language (FQL) and wither away and die when you try to run them outside the Facebook ecosystem. With OpenSocial, popular applications like iLike and RockYou, which were bedridden at Facebook, can frolic freely among the multitude of social networks that exist outside of the Facebook party of one.
This is a revolutionary move that takes the chains off the successful apps that were previously limited to Facebook turf. It will expose app developers to niche crowds and non-Facebookies alike as well as allow for revenue from widespread advertising on various platforms.
So, the big fat pink elephant-shaped question in the room is: Will Facebook lose its grip on one of the two aspects of its site that drove its fame? (The other being all those photos of college kids vomiting lite beer.)
Probably not. Nobunny likes change. Especially not bunnies with 300+ Facebook friends, 8 gazillion tagged photos, and a busload of third-party applications all set up to their liking and synced with their friends. Think of all the time we've invested adding friends, tagging friends, building walls. Not to be overly sanguine, but the move from Facebook to one of the OpenSocial apps would be reminiscent of the move from the college dorm to the world of work. (Where's a violin when you need one?)
Furthermore, Facebook did not build its third-party platform and rest its feet. There is more fun to be had, especially with the impending debut of Facebook Music, the not-yet-released online music service destined to compete with iTunes and MySpace . (By the way, where is MySpace in all of this? Oh, right, excuse me -- nobody cares.)
Overall, OpenSocial will probably benefit the app developers who seek broader territory, as well as app developers who've not yet set up their apps on Facebook. But it probably won't lead to a great shift of tides or the demise of Facebook as we know it. Nor will it be Orkut's saving grace, at least not initially. As The New York Times brilliantly pointed out yesterday: "A person briefed on the plans said the sites in the alliance had a combined 100 million users, more than double the size of Facebook." Well, thanks to Sherlock for the fascinating statistic, but when the teams are 12 versus 1 what exactly are we comparing?
I don't think it will revive myspace. Once the Internet proletariat (Interprolariat, to you) starts viewing things once considered hot as uncool that's usual curtains for them.
The New York Times today reported that MySpace has joined the OpenSocial alliance. While MySpace's traffic has become stagnant and Facebook's has been steadily on the rise, MySpace is still in the lead with the most users. Will Facebook get a chance to catch up or will MySpace's traffic surge again once it starts adding OpenSocial apps?
Right well this will be great for the developers, like I said, but I don't think there will be this colossal shift. Not for a while, at least. Especially if Facebook continues to one up everyone, which it hopes to do with its music service. We shall see. Also, yeah 2 users to 1, but that's really irrelevant. There are over 7000 applications on Facebook. Those developers who've already created Facebook code will stay on Facebook and potentially increase their users by creating OpenSocial code and stretching across several platforms. I'm not saying this shift will never happen, but it's not going to happen instantly. But the whole point is, whether there's a big shift or not, the developers are going to be on the winning end.
Being first to market with something doesn't necessarily mean you'll be there to see the last to market. Sure facebook is flying high now, but the young people that frequent it can be a fickle bunch. I remember when Xanga was the ultimate destination for social networking. People built up huge pages with journals, pictures, and thousands of friends, yet in the end they all flocked over to myspace and facebok when that became the next cool thing. Whose to say they won't do it again? I'm sure the application developers are interested. After all, they're not writing up all these silly facebook apps because they think facebook is cool. They're doing it because they're hoping to eventually make money off of it. And even though the OpenSocial vs. Facebook battle would be 12 against 1 as you pointed out, its still 2 to 1 in users which is all the application developers will care about.
The ThinkerNet does not reflect the views of TechWeb. The ThinkerNet is an informal means of communication to members and visitors of the Internet Evolution site. Individual authors are chosen by Internet Evolution to blog. Neither Internet Evolution nor TechWeb assume responsibility for comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and ThinkerNet bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
We hope you can tune in for an IE Radio interview today with a true industry innovator, Jeff Jonas, chief scientist at IBM. We're talking to Jonas today at 3:00 p.m. ET. Do. Not. Miss. It.
Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL)'s recent unveiling of its "magical" iPad may have fanboys counting the days until March, but if a recent poll on Internet Evolution is any indication, not everyone is buying into the hype.
We do a lot of grousing here on Internet Evolution, and usually for good reason, considering the amount of nonsense that keeps this industry afloat on its cloud of hot steamy air!!!! But... we can still happily acknowledge those titans who have succeeded in leading the way or paving new ground in their respective fields and, in turn, give credit when it is well deserved.
The Wall Street Journal reports that the National Security Agency (NSA) has been working with Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) to look into the attacks on its Chinese servers.
Smarter Collaboration: How to Thrive in a Challenging Business Environment Market conditions are changing faster than ever, and organizations need to improve their agility and adaptability in order to provide better service and improve processes. The ability to work with customers, business partners, and employees as effectively as possible - while at the same time holding down costs - is a key to success. READ THIS eBOOK
your weekly update of news, analysis, and
opinion from Internet Evolution - FREE! REGISTER HERE
Wanted! Site Moderators Internet Evolution is looking for a handful of readers to help moderate the message boards on our site – as well as engaging in high-IQ conversation with the industry mavens on our thinkerNet blogosphere. The job comes with various perks, bags of kudos, and GIANT bragging rights. Interested?
To save this item to your list of favorite Internet Evolution content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
YouTube launches 'YouTube Direct' to give 'citizen' journalism a better platform and in so doing may just ensure that 'quality' journalism soon becomes a thing of the past.
Saunders is wrong on Hulu, Fritz thinks. By most measures it's been
a success, and there's no reason this model won't become even bigger in the next three years. Oh, and he hates Steve's hat.
Meet Leo Prieto, the "anti-Murdoch" of Latin America, and founder of www.betazeta.com, one of the region's largest and most exciting social networks and content aggregators.
Evidence shows that you can tweet too much. Sites and services like Twitter and Facebook are a good place to reach your audience, but think quality over quantity.
A digital content market is emerging. Only two things are known about it: the first is that at some point the Internet will primarily become a paid network. The second known factor is that there are innumerable variables in the digital content market that have yet to be worked out. It’s not known, for example, exactly how users will pay for content (micropayments, subscriptions, bartering of farm animals, other).
The Google backlash continues. After seeing their Project 10^100 submissions disappear into the bowels of a Google server farm, a group of irate developers has started their own site to re-collect and vote on the ideas.
Bad news! By eliminating the world’s digital divide we’re likely to create a new divide: the information divide, where we end up creating a two-tier Internet where access to 'quality' content is controlled and charged for by mega-corporations, and the gulf between information haves and have-nots is entirely dependent on how much money they have. This is, of course, an almost exact inversion of the current situation on the Internet – where access is expensive and content is free.
Research shows that the youth of today like Facebook – but not blogging or Twitter. Does that mean Facebook has won, or just that it's not yet out of favor? Will all the services we see today fade into Ovaltine-or-Wheaties status in just a few years?
What kinds of companies are doing the most innovation in the data center? Turns out it's midtier enterprises that are taking the "Just Right" approach.
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Email This
TWEET THIS
