Web 2.0 appears to be largely based on someone's executive decision to develop abominably stupid names for companies and services. Thus, we bid you welcome to the floor TokBox, a video chat service that, according to The New York Times, "wants to do for live video chats what YouTube did for video watching."
Just to be clear: What
YouTube Inc. did for video watching was eliminate standards and give a forum to talking cats. Yes?
TokBox, a six-month-old (aww) startup still in beta testing, hopes to make video communication easier by eliminating software downloads and bringing it to the browser. Video communication is the wave of the future, yippie kay yay, and all that jazz...
Here's a pro-con rundown:
What doesn't suck about TokBox?
It's backed by YouTube cofounder, Jawed Karim.
It's a browser-based communications tool. This doesn't automatically equate to "good," but it could be a nice alternative to Skype Ltd. and Windows Live Messenger, which have both contributed to my tech-related ulcers.
It allows you to send video mail to those who would like to see you but not enough to actually engage in face-to-face banter. "Leave a message and a pixilated moving image of your grotesquely enlarged head at the beep."
A TokBox module can be embedded on social networking sites. I guess this is a pro if you're the kind of person who goes in for that sort of thing. "Hi everyone! I just wanted to give you all my daily update on how I'm doing with the Master Cleanse diet..."
Why TokBox kinda sucks:
It's based in San Francisco. These days, this is enough of a con, but I'll forge ahead.
It's backed by the YouTube guy. Don't forget he left YouTube before it actually made any money. Smoooooooth.
What's with these names? Apparently it's a requirement for the execs at "TokBox" to have names that are as unpronounceable as they are hilarious. Serge Faguet, Roelof Botha, Rajeev Motwani... so sorry your mothers hated you.
Slogan... "TokBox: Talk to the World." The world?! I'm having enough trouble managing the conversations with the voices in my head. The world will have to wait.
Do we really need a TokBox module for social networking sites? Blah. Get your flapping trap off my MySpace.
Jeez, people, lighten up... it's just a bit of fun. I wouldn't be offended if someone in India were ROTFL right now because my name sounds like "ox fondler" in Tamil.
While I agree that the names of many new 2.0 companies appear to be just about as random as they are thought out, taking a Digg at personal names of players in the startup game is just as ridiculous as it can get.
The parents of these entrepreneurs did not hate them and thus name them. That premise is nothing but inflamatory and uninformed.
The knock at their personal names is obviously just a little punch to the shoulder. Obviously nobody's name really has any effect on anything ever. Laugh a little. However, the Web 2.0 comment was directed at the companies themselves. Some of these names are pretty silly. Ever heard of Joost, imeem, Hulu, Twitter, the list goes on.
and this statement: "Web 2.0 appears to be largely based on someone's executive decision to develop abominably stupid names for companies and services."
WHAAAT? I don't know, but maybe I'm hearing "i have to come up with a post before deadline - what can I trash?"
Not like "I" think TokBox is a great idea or anything. But it is someone's dream and hey, I don't have any money invested in the thing...
Let's try to stay away from laughing at people's names. If we want the Internet to be a truly global enabler, you have to get over the fact that you'll run into names that have funny connotations in different languages. You can bash people for their acts, but, please, not for things that are part of who they are such as their names, skin color, physical appearance, etc.
The ThinkerNet does not reflect the views of TechWeb. The ThinkerNet is an informal means of communication to members and visitors of the Internet Evolution site. Individual authors are chosen by Internet Evolution to blog. Neither Internet Evolution nor TechWeb assume responsibility for comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and ThinkerNet bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
Ahh, the holiday season is upon us: People have begun bargain hunting, department stores are donning premature decorations, turkeys are being shot to death, and email inboxes everywhere are being graced with season-appropriate promotional materials so absurd, one might think they were actually written by the clinically insane.
Considering President Obama went and took the Nobel Peace Prize this year (attention hog, much?), Internet Evolution had to settle for a nomination for the second best prize in the world: a MIN Editorial & Design award. And we're happy to say that we won. Big time.
NEW YORK -- Web 2.0 Expo -- Here at the Javits Center in New York City, several industry innovators have come out to take the stage at the Web 2.0 Expo. But some are having a hard time keeping the audience's attention. The culprit? What else? Twitter.
The debate over whether Google is fairly aggregating newspaper content online has been going on for a while, with Rupert Murdoch and News Corp. leading the discourse. Typically it's followed a consistent pattern: Murdoch complains about Google stealing its content to no real benefit to his company, someone suggests hiding the content from Google, and things get quiet on the News Corp. side of the room.
While Google introduces its new Chrome OS (which I'm hearing will be widely available in one year? Did I mishear that?), IBM announced 10 new products today to help companies using IBM System z mainframe technology.
Smarter Collaboration: How to Thrive in a Challenging Business Environment Market conditions are changing faster than ever, and organizations need to improve their agility and adaptability in order to provide better service and improve processes. The ability to work with customers, business partners, and employees as effectively as possible - while at the same time holding down costs - is a key to success. READ THIS eBOOK
your weekly update of news, analysis, and
opinion from Internet Evolution - FREE! REGISTER HERE
Wanted! Site Moderators Internet Evolution is looking for a handful of readers to help moderate the message boards on our site – as well as engaging in high-IQ conversation with the industry mavens on our thinkerNet blogosphere. The job comes with various perks, bags of kudos, and GIANT bragging rights. Interested?
To save this item to your list of favorite Internet Evolution content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
The problem with telepresence is that it's not universally accepted, because video calling isn't. While we can all do video calling, we also apparently worry too much about how we look. If we want HD telepresence in our future, we have to dress down, mess up our hair, and dive into our online life.
When Reiter gets incensed over incompetent Verizon FiOS order-taking and support, he broadcasts it via Twitter. Did it do any good? How should your company offer Twitter support? Watch this for all the answers.
The programmable Web, open APIs, and cloud-based services will fundamentally change orthodox telcos, and they need to decide what they are really good for in this new world: It's not necessarily what you might think, according to one of the world's biggest telcos.
Cloud computing is being dampened by the lack of local application support for offline use. Google's partnership with open-source should encourage it to build tight integration between Google Docs and OpenOffice, and thus boost the cloud and counter Microsoft at the same time.
Industry initiatives and government stimulus funds are giving enterprise software vendors a great opportunity to help build out and manage smart grid technologies.
The problem with telepresence is that it's not universally accepted, because video calling isn't. While we can all do video calling, we also apparently worry too much about how we look. If we want HD telepresence in our future, we have to dress down, mess up our hair, and dive into our online life.
The US loses about $20 billion a year on pirated software, movies, and music. But public policy can help stem the tide of digital theft. For example, France has recently passed a 'three strikes and you’re out' law, whereby if after two warning letters an individual continues to download pirated software then his Internet access will be cut off. US policy makers should consider adopting similar policies.
Financial management planning does not need to include Voodoo economics, but it does help to tap into the knowledge base of your team through some sort of real-time system. We explore your options.
When Reiter gets incensed over incompetent Verizon FiOS order-taking and support, he broadcasts it via Twitter. Did it do any good? How should your company offer Twitter support? Watch this for all the answers.
The successor to the BlackBerry Bold 9000 – the Bold 9700 – will be available soon in the US. Is it worth upgrading? Reiter's got one, and offers advice.
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Email This
TWEET THIS
