The Macrosite for News, Analysis and Opinion about the Future of the Internet
Geoff Beckman

Banks Are an Offer Many Families Can Refuse

Written by Geoff Beckman
3/14/2013 41 comments
no ratings
DISCUSS     Email This

In a recent column, Mitch Wagner wrote, "Every business -- except one -- strives to make things easier for users." But as bad as Internet publishers are, banks make them look like concierges. That's why banks are quietly heading down the road to oblivion.

In 2011, the FDIC surveyed US households to learn how Americans use banks. The result? Many Americans don't.

  • Ten million households (8.2 percent) have no bank account. The number of unbanked households rose from 7.7 percent in 2009.
  • Twenty-four million households (20.1 percent) are underbanked, versus 18.2 percent in 2009. They have accounts, but if they have a financial problem, they often choose check-cashing services, payday loans, wire transfers, or pawn shops.

Other industries have turned to the Internet to improve service or cut costs. Banks have used it to charge customers or eliminate overhead. According to IBM, it costs banks 9-15 cents to process a paper check. By contrast, it costs only a penny to process an electronic transaction. Nevertheless, banks often charge customers $5-$10 a month for online bill payment, calling it a premium service.

Unfree checking
Families once had a simple choice: Earn interest on deposits by keeping a minimum balance (with the risk of paying a fee for dropping below that minimum), or forgo the interest and bank for free. In 2006, 76 percent of zero-interest accounts charged no fees. Last year, that figure was 39 percent. Banks will waive fees if you meet certain conditions. But if your employer doesn't offer direct deposit (or you lose your job), you're zapped with penalties.

No statement for you
Four of the 10 largest banks charge extra to mail statements to customers. Banks let customers download statements, but nearly 32 percent of households (coming from the same demographic segments as the unbanked) don't have broadband Internet access.

Limited access
We're inured to banks being open only while we're at work. But their computers also keep bankers' hours. My top-tier bank won't transfer funds from checking to loan accounts after 5:00 p.m. on weekdays, or on weekends and holidays.

Another large local bank won't credit a direct deposit (which would typically run at midnight) until 8:00 a.m., but any charges received in the intervening eight hours post immediately. Deposits made after business hours (even if you work with a teller at a branch that is still open) won't post until the next business day. Depending on the amount and your balance, out-of-state checks (even from Fortune 500 companies) can take two business days to clear. Even bank wire transfers don't post immediately.

Noting these issues, a Consumerist blog post said people needing immediate, guaranteed access to their money might consider the fees imposed by check-cashing services to be money well spent.

Overdraft shafting
Unlike credit card companies (which decline transactions if you don't have credit available), banks process all charges -- adding a fee if your balance falls below zero. Last year, the median fee was $29, and banks collected $31.5 billion. Banks count on overdraft fees to boost profitability, so much so that they've ignored generally accepted accounting principles (in layman’s terms, committing fraud) to boost this revenue.

Let's test your banking aptitude. Suppose you have $50 in checking and make the following transactions during the day.

  1. You pay $10 for breakfast at 8:00 a.m.
  2. You pay $20 for lunch at noon
  3. You make a $60 deposit at a supermarket branch at 6:30 p.m.
  4. You pay $40 for dinner at 8:00 p.m.

Assuming that your overdrafts cost $29, what should your balance be at day's end, after your $70 of purchases and your $60 deposit? Reconciling all charges at the end of the day would leave you with a $40 balance. FIFO accounting would produce one overdraft and a balance of $11. At most banks, you'd be overdrawn by $18, because banks sequence transactions in the order that produces maximum fees.

  • The $40 dinner check is paid first, dropping your balance to $10.
  • Next comes your $20 lunch. That puts you at minus-$10, so the bank adds a $29 overdraft fee. New balance: minus-$39.
  • Then the bank processes your $10 breakfast to take you to minus-$49. For processing this overdraft, the bank charges another $29 fee.
  • At midnight, your $60 deposit (made after the 4:00 p.m. posting deadline) is applied to your minus-$78 balance, leaving you at minus-$18.

Since your balance is negative, each transaction processed the next day adds another $29 charge. What's most galling: Assuming you used direct deposit to get free checking, your bank knows more money is coming -- both the amount and the arrival date.

Sadly, that's not a hypothetical case. In the last year, five of the top 10 banks have settled class actions revolving around this practice, paying a combined $864.5 million. Many other lenders have cases pending.

Payday lenders, by contrast, seem beneficent. They're open nights and weekends. Some process requests online or by phone. They will serve you if you can present two forms of ID, a recent pay stub, and a checking account. They don't charge a loan origination fee. And you get a response in 10 minutes, not 10 business days.

Yes, the charges ($15 to $20 for every $100 advanced) meet the legal definition of usury. Since you repay the amount from your next paycheck, the annual rate is 200-400 percent. But if you can't pay, the lender will roll the balance over, adding another fee. It's more manageable than an endless series of overdraft fees.

Since bank online bill payment requires you to authorize payments one to four business days ahead of the payment date (so the bank can remove your money immediately, print and mail a check, and take advantage of the float until it clears), it's more convenient to go to your vendor to sign up for bill payment.

For many households, a bank provides only one service: a debit card, reloaded via direct deposit, that you can use to pay merchants that take credit cards. Considering the fees, it's an offer that a growing number of households can refuse.

Related posts:

— Geoff Beckman is a management, communications, strategy, and technology consultant based in Cleveland.

DISCUSS     Email This
Current display:       chronological order       display newest comments first
Page 1 of 5   Next >
Tobyd
IQ Crew
Thursday March 14, 2013 6:23:17 AM
no ratings

Nice summary. I have never had any love for banks, the current crisis notwithstanding. I once told Chase that wacking me with dozens of fees after they mistakenly bounced a check was equivalent to being kicked in the head by a good friend after being tripped up by same. Then I closed the account fees unpaid. What else could they expect. As for this "At most banks, you'd be overdrawn by $18, because banks sequence transactions in the order that produces maximum fees" it defies belief. I think we are better going back to a cash based system until this is cleared up.

Geoff Beckman
Thinkernetter
Thursday March 14, 2013 6:53:44 AM
no ratings

@Tobyd: Technically, what banks do violates the civil code. But it's still a violation of law.

It's the problem with being publicly-traded in this era. The notion of a stable investment that provides consistent, predictable returns is anathema, People want every listed stock to show high margins and explosive growth. Banking, as many people have pointed out, is is a low-margin business, if it is done properly. To generate high returns, you have to play games.

There are likely to be one of two endgames.

First. credit unions supply excellent service... but, all too often, they're technological backwaters. The one my wife's employer uses doesn't offer a debit card, online bill payment-- or even a web site that's anything more than a brochure.  They move into the current century, that's a major threat.

Second, if mobile payment systems become secure and reliable, there will be virtually no reason for most people to use a bank. Time did a story about mobile money systems in Afghanistan not long ago.

kq4ym
IQ Crew
Thursday March 14, 2013 8:15:47 AM
no ratings

Banks like all businesses are in it to make a profit in their particular niche area. Seemingly they want customers with some assets (cash) that can be parked in the bank drawing little or no interest. And on the other end want to charge the highest fees possible for services (including overdrafts, interest, etc.)

On the low end of the asset spectrum, payday loan outfits caters to those with little cash, and charge the highest fees they can, often usarious in the general meaning of the term.

Walmart has begun to get into the banking business and maybe will meet somewhere inbetween, meeting the needs of those with some cash assets but not much.

It may be hard to find a bank that's friendly to all manner of customers, rich or poor. 

Geoff Beckman
Thinkernetter
Thursday March 14, 2013 9:16:34 AM
no ratings

@kq4ym: Quite so. A better solution is a savings and loan association, most of which are locally-owned and privately held.

That industry, sadly, still hasn't recovered from the black eye administered in the 80's, from Charlie Keating, et al. Also, some of them lack the convenieneces (ATMs or debit cards) people have come to rely on and most of them are very bad at marketing.

The Cleveland area has an oustanding S&L--- best home loan rates in the area and an outstanding first-time buyers' program. But you wouldn't realize, unless you combed their web site carefully, that they offer checking accounts or havs ATMs. 

Michael P. Kassner
Thinkernetter
Thursday March 14, 2013 10:30:40 AM
no ratings

Since you are talking about online banking, I thought I might add a simple warning about mobile-device banking apps or using mobile-device's web browsers to do banking. There is a good chance the web browser developer or mobile app developer is running a MitM sending all your banking traffic to their servers then passing it along to the bank's servers.

The reason is so the web browser or app will display quickly and correctly on the small screen. In order to do that the HTTPS traffic has to be decrypted before getting to the bank. So your financial information is in the clear at that point and that could be a concern. 

http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/security/redirection-and-decryption-of-mobile-traffic-is-your-browser-a-mitm/9115?tag=content;blog-list-river

 

Geoff Beckman
Thinkernetter
Thursday March 14, 2013 10:47:01 AM
no ratings

@Michael P. Kassner: Thanks for pointing that out. "Could be" isn't the phrase I would use. I'd sooner lend my credit cards to strangers than bank by phone or tablet. I don't do wireless internet banking. (In fact, I growl at my wife when she uses her debit card.)

At some point, I assume the technology will be properly secure. I would like to think that won't be too far in the future.

But then I would like to think that the Browns will win the Super Bowl. I'm not holding my breath until either of those things happen.

Tobyd
IQ Crew
Thursday March 14, 2013 11:43:26 AM
no ratings

Agreed. I have been wondering for a while what a banking system really looks like when you strip away the vaults and armored cars. It is basically a store and forward business with strong authentication controls. I was thinking that if the definition of banking could be re-written then many other enterprises could offer 'banking' and it would suit the public need, not the bankers. Will this ever happen..?

hounhosp
Thinkernetter
Thursday March 14, 2013 12:16:26 PM
no ratings

"it costs only a penny to process an electronic transaction. Nevertheless, banks often charge customers $5-$10 a month for online bill payment, calling it a premium service."


That seems to be a lot, but I don't see how this could ever change. Financial institutions, like any other business want to make money and it is just how things work in a free market, right?

lin crampton
IQ Crew
Thursday March 14, 2013 12:42:05 PM
no ratings

@Michael -- Agree, mobile banking comes with security risks.  But mobile banking is so convenient that I cannot resist.  I minimize my exposure/risk by mobile depositing into a small account, then later going online and transferring the funds from this small account into my main account.  The small account is simply a pass-through, so if access to the small account becomes compromised, there is only a limited amount of money at risk.

 

Michael P. Kassner
Thinkernetter
Thursday March 14, 2013 12:54:03 PM
no ratings

It is that your account information is available in the clear. It is a not something generally known by individuals. I used the banking app as an example. All HTTPS traffic displayed on the mobile web browser is decrypted. 

Page 1 of 5   Next >
The ThinkerNet does not reflect the views of TechWeb. The ThinkerNet is an informal means of communication to members and visitors of the Internet Evolution site. Individual authors are chosen by Internet Evolution to blog. Neither Internet Evolution nor TechWeb assume responsibility for comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and ThinkerNet bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
previous posts from Geoff Beckman
Geoff Beckman
Geoff Beckman   2/20/2013   47 comments
When Boeing announced the 787 luxury jet in January 2003, the company christened it "The Dreamliner." Ten years later, it’s become a nightmare. The litany of problems with the 787 makes an SAP project look like a Swiss watch.
IETV: the thinkerNet on film
5
of
Kim Davis
Big-Data Can’t Always Sell Wine

5|21|13   |   2:23   |   3 comments


Whole Foods Global Wine Purchaser Doug Bell told me about some of the constraints on using analytics in the US wine market.
Paul J. Fleuranges
Digital Signage Keeps NYC Subway Straphangers on Track

5|6|13   |   3:51   |   No comments


New York's Metropolitan Transit Authority is conducting a pilot test of digital kiosks to guide subway users to where they want to go more efficiently and at lower cost.
Kim Davis
Fast Forward to the Future

4|23|13   |   2:29   |   20 comments


A look back at tech writing in the 90s makes us wonder where enterprise IT will be 20 years from now.
Mitch Wagner
Google Launches Its Most Depressing Service Yet

4|15|13   |   2:59   |   10 comments


Google's new Inactive Account Manager lets you control how Google disposes of your accounts when you die.
Second Shooter
Argument Over Top-Level Domains Is 'Stupid'

4|11|13   |   2:07   |   3 comments


The whole Amazon.reader debate is a double-stupid. It's stupid to think that there's any e-book buyer who doesn't know Amazon's URL, and it was stupider to let ICANN launch the whole free-form TLD initiative to start with.
Kim Davis
Ladies, Your Tablet Awaits

3|21|13   |   2:22   |   37 comments


ePad Femme is the world’s first tablet “made exclusively for women.”
Wisdom of the Big Chair
NFC Moves Into the Mainstream

3|20|13   |   2:16   |   No comments


While NFC's original goal was to enhance mobile commerce applications, it is finding its way into a number of other uses, which is creating both opportunity as well as challenges for IT departments.
Wisdom of the Big Chair
Integrating Security Into Your Cloud Contract

3|19|13   |   3:35   |   No comments


Enterprises would like to move to cloud computing but are hesitant because they are concerned about providers’ ability to secure company data. Here are some tips that help to ensure that if breaches occur, the business is not left holding the bag.
Brian Baron
How Edmunds.com Collects Customer Information

3|18|13   |   1:15   |   No comments


Edmunds separates customers into segments based on the info it collects on its site and from partners, and uses that to push out custom content, said Brian Baron, director of business analytics for Edmunds.com, at Predictive Analytics Innovation Summit.
Brian Baron
How Edmunds.com Uses Analytics to Customize Site

3|14|13   |   0:47   |   No comments


The automotive website uses propensity modeling to target ads and customer registration forms, said Brian Baron, director of business analytics for Edmunds.com, at Predictive Analytics Innovation Summit.
an IBM information resource
sponsored content
big blue blog
Alison Diana
It's time for the annual IBM State of the State of Marketing, that time of the year when IBM reveals the results of its global survey of marketers.
an IBM information resource
sponsored content
Expert Integrated Systems: Changing the Experience & Economics of IT
In this e-book, we take an in-depth look at these expert integrated systems -- what they are, how they work, and how they have the potential to help CIOs achieve dramatic savings while restoring IT's role as business innovator.

READ THIS eBOOK
your weekly update of news, analysis, and
opinion from Internet Evolution - FREE!

REGISTER HERE
Wanted! Site Moderators
Internet Evolution is looking for a handful of readers to help moderate the message boards on our site – as well as engaging in high-IQ conversation with the industry mavens on our thinkerNet blogosphere. The job comes with various perks, bags of kudos, and GIANT bragging rights. Interested?

Please email: moderators@internetevolution.com
Internet Evolution – not for thickies
Keep Critical Data With a Knowledge Management System
Taimoor Zubair
Fortune 500 companies lose at least
$31.5 billion a year by failing to share knowledge. A Knowledge Management System (KMS) can help companies significantly reduce these costs.

CLICK FOR MORE
Yahoo Needs to Break Tumblr in Order to Fix It
Joe Stanganelli
As
Mitch Wagner discussed today, Yahoo is acquiring Tumblr. The big Internet debate at the moment is whether Tumblr will be good or bad for Yahoo. Regardless of their stances on the future of Yahoo itself, many claim that Yahoo will somehow ruin Tumblr.

CLICK FOR MORE