If you delete an email or remove a tag from a photo on Facebook, you have a right to believe that the email is gone, or that there is no longer a record of the tag. But in a recent case in Austria, a 24-year-old law student found that Facebook saved everything forever, even items he had explicitly deleted.
According to an article on the Guardian's Website, Max Schrems requested a CD from Facebook with all his content after attending a lecture by a Facebook executive and apparently not liking what he heard. To its credit, Facebook complied, but to Schrems' surprise, he found his entire Facebook history was intact on the site, including Friend requests he ignored, people he had un-Friended, deleted emails, and photos retaining tags he had removed.
Shrems complained to the Irish Data Protection Commission, which is responsible for these complaints in Europe. The commission is investigating. If found guilty of violating Schrems' privacy, Facebook could be subject to a 100,000 euro fine ($137,750 in US dollars, according to Sunday's exchange rate). That may be a drop in the bucket for a company like Facebook, but a ruling against the company could open the floodgates for similar complaints, and that could get very costly indeed.
And after spending some time last week at the ARMA International Conference & Expo for recordkeeping and data governance professionals, I watched this story through a different prism than perhaps I normally would. That's because recordkeepers are a particularly paranoid bunch. They don't really like social media on the open Web -- or just about anything that's outside their direct control.
One of the issues that recordkeepers have with cloud services in general is the idea of deleting data. When your company could be subject to e-discovery requests regarding social media or any content stored in the cloud, you need to know that deleted content is actually deleted. And when you read an article like the one on the Guardian site, it could make you want to lock down the entire operation, rightly or wrongly.
Sure, it's definitely better to set realistic governance policies around all social media and to establish realistic social media archiving policies. It's all well and good to tell the folks responsible for records in the enterprise to be realistic, but they need to have some reasonable assurance that when someone deletes something, it's actually deleted.
That's because businesses are sued all the time, and they are subject to rules of electronic discovery. When a plaintiff's lawyer asks for information on a certain topic and you say confidently those records have been deleted within your clearly defined record retention policies, you want to know they really have been taken down.
If Facebook isn't actually deleting those emails or other interactions, and you believe they were deleted, your company can be in big trouble if it turns out those records actually exist somewhere.
That's why Facebook must establish a clearer policy on deleting content. Individuals and businesses have a right to delete their content, and there has to be a way to ensure that, once you've deleted it, it's going to be gone -– really gone -- in a reasonable amount of time.
This is a case where the stricter privacy policies in place in Europe might end up benefiting us all in the long run if Facebook is forced to change its policies and remove deleted content from its servers once and for all.
— Ron Miller is a freelance technology journalist, blogger, FierceContentManagement editor, and contributing editor at EContent magazine.
Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard just ask. Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS. [Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one? Zuck: People just submitted it. Zuck: I don't know why. Zuck: They "trust me" Zuck: Dumb f***s.
So if anyone is interested there is a Bootcamp here Nov 1 - "Learn how to become the next Zuckerberg -- not the next Winklevoss!"
I have to say my perspective is more like yours -- there's nothing nefarious about it, just Facebook wanting to make sure you could change your mind later; I wouldn't mind, for example, seeing 'which friends have I deleted' and so on. On the other hand, I certainly see Ron's point about ediscovery, which was an angle I hadn't thought of.
I agree with Kim that that the data is rich for market intelligence and studying user's behavior and this is why Facebook may not want to get rid of it. However, I don't think it's a big deal to put an "inactive" check against the data so that it gets filtered out when they provide the data to the users.
Actually, the idea of plain laziness makes sense. It requires work to start parsing through all user info, isolating some things and deleting others, sometimes permanently, sometimes temporarily. That requires policies, coding, resources. Perhaps FB simply doesn't want to sink the effort into it right now -- especially if it doesn't have to by law.
I am honestly hoping that decisive action by a regulator, here or in Europe, will lead to a change in attitude.
@Kim, I am not sure what decisive action regulators will take. So it would be better if FB users teach a lesson to FB by boycotting it for some brief period.
There's a data race going on right now, with the assumption that the holders of the biggest collections of data will win. Of course, the ability of extract value from data is essential: a big, unanalyzable data set is no use to anyone.
But the thought seems to be, grab the data first, store everything, and worry about handling it later. Facebook, despite its feverish scramble for data, is actually lagging behind financial institutions and other organizations in terms of what it collects.
Facebook may be subject to just plain laziness, or compulsive saving disorder. Someone says to take it down, but they just forget, or don't get around to it. Maybe a bit of OCD in the ranks, forces a need to keep everything no matter what!
Well, yes that much i appreciate. Information is valuable and cheap enough to store. I'm looking deeper at that value. That makes them unwilling to lose even a single bit of information about anyone. In the belief that they will need it someday in the future.
The key to understanding the mind of the marketologist is to let go of the idea that individual actions matter. Sure, you read an article about shoes, and you see a shoe ad. But the big picture is considerably more complicated. The photo that you "like" may simply help to put you into a certain demographic pile. Maybe X% of people who clicked on photos with a caption that included the word Y are also likely to be interested in a sale at American Apparel. Maybe you are identifying yourself as a "mouse potato" or "indie-lectual" (actual marketing terms).
The ThinkerNet does not reflect the views of TechWeb. The ThinkerNet is an informal means of communication to members and visitors of the Internet Evolution site. Individual authors are chosen by Internet Evolution to blog. Neither Internet Evolution nor TechWeb assume responsibility for comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and ThinkerNet bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
The call (or, should I say, the Twitter DM) finally arrived. My Google Glass is ready. All I need to do is travel to Manhattan and fork over $1,500, and this piece of cutting-edge technology will be all mine.
When a new technology comes along, the standard reaction seems to focus on the most negative aspect of the device at the cost of all positive possibilities.
Recently, the Obama administration has been of two minds where privacy rights are concerned. On one hand, you have an administration that vowed to veto CISPA and mandated open data for government websites. On the other hand, you have an increasingly out-of-control Department of Justice on a fishing expedition at AP and demanding legislation to let the FBI wiretap private, encrypted communications and levy fines if a company fails to comply.
These days, even some usually techno-friendly people have their hackles up about the potential of Google Glass to surreptitiously record video or take pictures. I've heard more than one tech savvy friend bring up "the creep factor," the ability of a weird guy to secretly record you.
Michael Brutsch, a.k.a. Reddit's Violentacrez, is a creep who posted borderline kiddie porn to the Internet anonymously, and got fired when outed by a media outlet. It's a cautionary tale even for people who aren't jerks and predators.
Companies are still getting their feet wet with social networking and what employees should and shouldn't broadcast. But they don't always involve HR and PR. Here's why they should, and what they risk when they don't.
More companies are trolling social networks to find and vet potential job candidates. Beware the pitfalls of blurring the line between personal and professional lives.
New tools like laptops, tablets, smartphone, and wireless connectivity let us work from San Diego to Katmandu, and anywhere in between. But time management remains a problem.
Showing results is the best way to win over social business doubters, according to Mary Maida, Medtronic lead information solutions manager. Internet Evolution's Mitch Wagner interviewed Maida at the E2 Innovate conference.
Wells Fargo uses social software to replace email chains and help its sales team collaborate more effectively to land deals, according to Kelli Carlson-Jagersma, VP Collaboration Strategy for Wells Fargo. Mitch Wagner spoke with Carlson-Jagersma at the E2Innovate conference
Big-data and analytics tools enable marketers to understand customers as individuals, identifying unmet needs and addressing each customer as a "segment of one," says John Kennedy, VP corporate marketing, IBM.
New York's Metropolitan Transit Authority is conducting a pilot test of digital kiosks to guide subway users to where they want to go more efficiently and at lower cost.
The whole Amazon.reader debate is a double-stupid. It's stupid to think that there's any e-book buyer who doesn't know Amazon's URL, and it was stupider to let ICANN launch the whole free-form TLD initiative to start with.
While NFC's original goal was to enhance mobile commerce applications, it is finding its way into a number of other uses, which is creating both opportunity as well as challenges for IT departments.
Enterprises would like to move to cloud computing but are hesitant because they are concerned about providers’ ability to secure company data. Here are some tips that help to ensure that if breaches occur, the business is not left holding the bag.
Edmunds separates customers into segments based on the info it collects on its site and from partners, and uses that to push out custom content, said Brian Baron, director of business analytics for Edmunds.com, at Predictive Analytics Innovation Summit.
The IBM Smarter Commerce Global Summit in Monaco kicked into high gear today, and we've already begun to see news emerging from that lovely city-state by the sea.
Expert Integrated Systems: Changing the Experience & Economics of IT In this e-book, we take an in-depth look at these expert integrated systems -- what they are, how they work, and how they have the potential to help CIOs achieve dramatic savings while restoring IT's role as business innovator. READ THIS eBOOK
your weekly update of news, analysis, and
opinion from Internet Evolution - FREE! REGISTER HERE
Wanted! Site Moderators Internet Evolution is looking for a handful of readers to help moderate the message boards on our site – as well as engaging in high-IQ conversation with the industry mavens on our thinkerNet blogosphere. The job comes with various perks, bags of kudos, and GIANT bragging rights. Interested?
To save this item to your list of favorite Internet Evolution content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
Email This
just ask. Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS. [Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one? Zuck: People just submitted it. Zuck: I don't know why. Zuck: They "trust me" Zuck: Dumb f***s.
